| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
GOLD_TRYBOT_URL= https://gold.skia.org/search?issue=2212473002
DOCS_PREVIEW= https://skia.org/?cl=2212473002
CQ_INCLUDE_TRYBOTS=master.client.skia:Test-Ubuntu-GCC-GCE-CPU-AVX2-x86_64-Release-SKNX_NO_SIMD-Trybot
[mtklein]
TBR=reed@google.com
Only removing unused public API.
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2212473002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
(patchset #8 id:150001 of https://codereview.chromium.org/2212473002/ )
Reason for revert:
missed GrVkPipelineStateCache
Original issue's description:
> SkRTConf: reduce functionality to what we use, increase simplicity
>
> GOLD_TRYBOT_URL= https://gold.skia.org/search?issue=2212473002
> DOCS_PREVIEW= https://skia.org/?cl=2212473002
> CQ_INCLUDE_TRYBOTS=master.client.skia:Test-Ubuntu-GCC-GCE-CPU-AVX2-x86_64-Release-SKNX_NO_SIMD-Trybot
>
> [mtklein]
> TBR=reed@google.com
> Only removing unused public API.
>
> Committed: https://skia.googlesource.com/skia/+/ef59974708dade6fa72fb0218d4f8a9590175c47
TBR=halcanary@google.com
# Skipping CQ checks because original CL landed less than 1 days ago.
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2215433003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
GOLD_TRYBOT_URL= https://gold.skia.org/search?issue=2212473002
DOCS_PREVIEW= https://skia.org/?cl=2212473002
CQ_INCLUDE_TRYBOTS=master.client.skia:Test-Ubuntu-GCC-GCE-CPU-AVX2-x86_64-Release-SKNX_NO_SIMD-Trybot
[mtklein]
TBR=reed@google.com
Only removing unused public API.
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2212473002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
It's always nice to kill off a synchronization primitive.
And while less terse, I think this new code reads more clearly.
... and, SkOncePtr's tests were the only thing now using sk_num_cores()
outside of SkTaskGroup, so I've hidden it as static inside SkTaskGroup.cpp.
BUG=skia:
GOLD_TRYBOT_URL= https://gold.skia.org/search2?unt=true&query=source_type%3Dgm&master=false&issue=1953533002
CQ_EXTRA_TRYBOTS=client.skia:Test-Ubuntu-GCC-GCE-CPU-AVX2-x86_64-Release-SKNX_NO_SIMD-Trybot
Committed: https://skia.googlesource.com/skia/+/9bd3fc7fa9bb7cad050bd619aa93d4c48ebb5c02
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/1953533002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
https://codereview.chromium.org/1949313003/ )
Reason for revert:
ok, I have no idea what's going on
Original issue's description:
> Reland of SkOncePtr -> SkOnce (patchset #1 id:1 of https://codereview.chromium.org/1945293004/ )
>
> Reason for revert:
> previous revert unneeded (I think)
>
> Original issue's description:
> > Revert of SkOncePtr -> SkOnce (patchset #4 id:60001 of https://codereview.chromium.org/1953533002/ )
> >
> > Reason for revert:
> > broken the Mac and Linux builders, e.g.:
> >
> > https://build.chromium.org/p/chromium/builders/Mac/builds/15151
> > https://build.chromium.org/p/chromium/builders/Linux%20x64/builds/19052
> >
> > Original issue's description:
> > > SkOncePtr -> SkOnce
> > >
> > > It's always nice to kill off a synchronization primitive.
> > > And while less terse, I think this new code reads more clearly.
> > >
> > > ... and, SkOncePtr's tests were the only thing now using sk_num_cores()
> > > outside of SkTaskGroup, so I've hidden it as static inside SkTaskGroup.cpp.
> > >
> > > BUG=skia:
> > > GOLD_TRYBOT_URL= https://gold.skia.org/search2?unt=true&query=source_type%3Dgm&master=false&issue=1953533002
> > > CQ_EXTRA_TRYBOTS=client.skia:Test-Ubuntu-GCC-GCE-CPU-AVX2-x86_64-Release-SKNX_NO_SIMD-Trybot
> > >
> > > Committed: https://skia.googlesource.com/skia/+/9bd3fc7fa9bb7cad050bd619aa93d4c48ebb5c02
> >
> > TBR=herb@google.com,mtklein@chromium.org
> > # Skipping CQ checks because original CL landed less than 1 days ago.
> > NOPRESUBMIT=true
> > NOTREECHECKS=true
> > NOTRY=true
> > BUG=skia:
> >
> > Committed: https://skia.googlesource.com/skia/+/7eb33da7eede34c050b865dbb1b60c3dcea7191b
>
> TBR=herb@google.com,mtklein@chromium.org
> # Skipping CQ checks because original CL landed less than 1 days ago.
> NOPRESUBMIT=true
> NOTREECHECKS=true
> NOTRY=true
> BUG=skia:
>
> Committed: https://skia.googlesource.com/skia/+/82da9a8aa0ce648f36882830765b42e0ada6c0fa
TBR=herb@google.com,mtklein@chromium.org
# Skipping CQ checks because original CL landed less than 1 days ago.
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=skia:
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/1948313002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
https://codereview.chromium.org/1945293004/ )
Reason for revert:
previous revert unneeded (I think)
Original issue's description:
> Revert of SkOncePtr -> SkOnce (patchset #4 id:60001 of https://codereview.chromium.org/1953533002/ )
>
> Reason for revert:
> broken the Mac and Linux builders, e.g.:
>
> https://build.chromium.org/p/chromium/builders/Mac/builds/15151
> https://build.chromium.org/p/chromium/builders/Linux%20x64/builds/19052
>
> Original issue's description:
> > SkOncePtr -> SkOnce
> >
> > It's always nice to kill off a synchronization primitive.
> > And while less terse, I think this new code reads more clearly.
> >
> > ... and, SkOncePtr's tests were the only thing now using sk_num_cores()
> > outside of SkTaskGroup, so I've hidden it as static inside SkTaskGroup.cpp.
> >
> > BUG=skia:
> > GOLD_TRYBOT_URL= https://gold.skia.org/search2?unt=true&query=source_type%3Dgm&master=false&issue=1953533002
> > CQ_EXTRA_TRYBOTS=client.skia:Test-Ubuntu-GCC-GCE-CPU-AVX2-x86_64-Release-SKNX_NO_SIMD-Trybot
> >
> > Committed: https://skia.googlesource.com/skia/+/9bd3fc7fa9bb7cad050bd619aa93d4c48ebb5c02
>
> TBR=herb@google.com,mtklein@chromium.org
> # Skipping CQ checks because original CL landed less than 1 days ago.
> NOPRESUBMIT=true
> NOTREECHECKS=true
> NOTRY=true
> BUG=skia:
>
> Committed: https://skia.googlesource.com/skia/+/7eb33da7eede34c050b865dbb1b60c3dcea7191b
TBR=herb@google.com,mtklein@chromium.org
# Skipping CQ checks because original CL landed less than 1 days ago.
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=skia:
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/1949313003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
https://codereview.chromium.org/1953533002/ )
Reason for revert:
broken the Mac and Linux builders, e.g.:
https://build.chromium.org/p/chromium/builders/Mac/builds/15151
https://build.chromium.org/p/chromium/builders/Linux%20x64/builds/19052
Original issue's description:
> SkOncePtr -> SkOnce
>
> It's always nice to kill off a synchronization primitive.
> And while less terse, I think this new code reads more clearly.
>
> ... and, SkOncePtr's tests were the only thing now using sk_num_cores()
> outside of SkTaskGroup, so I've hidden it as static inside SkTaskGroup.cpp.
>
> BUG=skia:
> GOLD_TRYBOT_URL= https://gold.skia.org/search2?unt=true&query=source_type%3Dgm&master=false&issue=1953533002
> CQ_EXTRA_TRYBOTS=client.skia:Test-Ubuntu-GCC-GCE-CPU-AVX2-x86_64-Release-SKNX_NO_SIMD-Trybot
>
> Committed: https://skia.googlesource.com/skia/+/9bd3fc7fa9bb7cad050bd619aa93d4c48ebb5c02
TBR=herb@google.com,mtklein@chromium.org
# Skipping CQ checks because original CL landed less than 1 days ago.
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=skia:
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/1945293004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
It's always nice to kill off a synchronization primitive.
And while less terse, I think this new code reads more clearly.
... and, SkOncePtr's tests were the only thing now using sk_num_cores()
outside of SkTaskGroup, so I've hidden it as static inside SkTaskGroup.cpp.
BUG=skia:
GOLD_TRYBOT_URL= https://gold.skia.org/search2?unt=true&query=source_type%3Dgm&master=false&issue=1953533002
CQ_EXTRA_TRYBOTS=client.skia:Test-Ubuntu-GCC-GCE-CPU-AVX2-x86_64-Release-SKNX_NO_SIMD-Trybot
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/1953533002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
- Moves CPU feature detection to its own file.
- Cleans up some redundant feature detection scattered around core/ and opts/.
- Can now detect a few new CPU features:
* F16C -> Intel f16<->f32 instructions, added between AVX and AVX2
* FMA -> Intel FMA instructions, added at the same time as AVX2
* VFP_FP16 -> ARM f16<->f32 instructions, quite common
* NEON_FMA -> ARM FMA instructions, also quite common
* SSE and SSE3... why not?
This new internal API makes it very cheap to do fine-grained runtime CPU
feature detection. Redundant calls to SkCpu::Supports() should be eliminated
and it's hoistable out of loops. It compiles away entirely when we have the
appropriate instructions available at compile time.
This means we can call it to guard even a little snippet of 1 or 2 instructions
right where needed and let inlining hoist the check (if any at all) up to
somewhere that doesn't hurt performance. I've explained how I made this work
in the private section of the new header.
Once this lands and bakes a bit, I'll start following up with CLs to use it more
and to add a bunch of those little 1-2 instruction snippets we've been wanting,
e.g. cvtps2ph, cvtph2ps, ptest, pmulld, pmovzxbd, blendvps, pshufb, roundps
(for floor) on x86, and vcvt.f32.f16, vcvt.f16.f32 on ARM.
BUG=skia:
GOLD_TRYBOT_URL= https://gold.skia.org/search2?unt=true&query=source_type%3Dgm&master=false&issue=1890483002
CQ_EXTRA_TRYBOTS=client.skia:Test-Ubuntu-GCC-GCE-CPU-AVX2-x86_64-Release-SKNX_NO_SIMD-Trybot
Committed: https://skia.googlesource.com/skia/+/872ea29357439f05b1f6995dd300fc054733e607
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1890483002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
of https://codereview.chromium.org/1890483002/ )
Reason for revert:
many unexpected GM diffs across GPU+CPU configs on Windows (hopefully just text masks on GPU?). seems like we pick a different srcover variant in some places.
Original issue's description:
> Move CPU feature detection to its own file.
>
> - Moves CPU feature detection to its own file.
> - Cleans up some redundant feature detection scattered around core/ and opts/.
> - Can now detect a few new CPU features:
> * F16C -> Intel f16<->f32 instructions, added between AVX and AVX2
> * FMA -> Intel FMA instructions, added at the same time as AVX2
> * VFP_FP16 -> ARM f16<->f32 instructions, quite common
> * NEON_FMA -> ARM FMA instructions, also quite common
> * SSE and SSE3... why not?
>
> This new internal API makes it very cheap to do fine-grained runtime CPU
> feature detection. Redundant calls to SkCpu::Supports() should be eliminated
> and it's hoistable out of loops. It compiles away entirely when we have the
> appropriate instructions available at compile time.
>
> This means we can call it to guard even a little snippet of 1 or 2 instructions
> right where needed and let inlining hoist the check (if any at all) up to
> somewhere that doesn't hurt performance. I've explained how I made this work
> in the private section of the new header.
>
> Once this lands and bakes a bit, I'll start following up with CLs to use it more
> and to add a bunch of those little 1-2 instruction snippets we've been wanting,
> e.g. cvtps2ph, cvtph2ps, ptest, pmulld, pmovzxbd, blendvps, pshufb, roundps
> (for floor) on x86, and vcvt.f32.f16, vcvt.f16.f32 on ARM.
>
> BUG=skia:
> GOLD_TRYBOT_URL= https://gold.skia.org/search2?unt=true&query=source_type%3Dgm&master=false&issue=1890483002
> CQ_EXTRA_TRYBOTS=client.skia:Test-Ubuntu-GCC-GCE-CPU-AVX2-x86_64-Release-SKNX_NO_SIMD-Trybot
>
> Committed: https://skia.googlesource.com/skia/+/872ea29357439f05b1f6995dd300fc054733e607
TBR=fmalita@chromium.org,herb@google.com,reed@google.com,mtklein@chromium.org
# Skipping CQ checks because original CL landed less than 1 days ago.
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=skia:
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1892643003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
- Moves CPU feature detection to its own file.
- Cleans up some redundant feature detection scattered around core/ and opts/.
- Can now detect a few new CPU features:
* F16C -> Intel f16<->f32 instructions, added between AVX and AVX2
* FMA -> Intel FMA instructions, added at the same time as AVX2
* VFP_FP16 -> ARM f16<->f32 instructions, quite common
* NEON_FMA -> ARM FMA instructions, also quite common
* SSE and SSE3... why not?
This new internal API makes it very cheap to do fine-grained runtime CPU
feature detection. Redundant calls to SkCpu::Supports() should be eliminated
and it's hoistable out of loops. It compiles away entirely when we have the
appropriate instructions available at compile time.
This means we can call it to guard even a little snippet of 1 or 2 instructions
right where needed and let inlining hoist the check (if any at all) up to
somewhere that doesn't hurt performance. I've explained how I made this work
in the private section of the new header.
Once this lands and bakes a bit, I'll start following up with CLs to use it more
and to add a bunch of those little 1-2 instruction snippets we've been wanting,
e.g. cvtps2ph, cvtph2ps, ptest, pmulld, pmovzxbd, blendvps, pshufb, roundps
(for floor) on x86, and vcvt.f32.f16, vcvt.f16.f32 on ARM.
BUG=skia:
GOLD_TRYBOT_URL= https://gold.skia.org/search2?unt=true&query=source_type%3Dgm&master=false&issue=1890483002
CQ_EXTRA_TRYBOTS=client.skia:Test-Ubuntu-GCC-GCE-CPU-AVX2-x86_64-Release-SKNX_NO_SIMD-Trybot
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1890483002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
BUG=skia:
GOLD_TRYBOT_URL= https://gold.skia.org/search2?unt=true&query=source_type%3Dgm&master=false&issue=1867193002
CQ_EXTRA_TRYBOTS=client.skia:Test-Ubuntu-GCC-GCE-CPU-AVX2-x86_64-Release-SKNX_NO_SIMD-Trybot
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1867193002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This should be a pixel-for-pixel (i.e. bug-for-bug) port.
BUG=skia:
GOLD_TRYBOT_URL= https://gold.skia.org/search2?unt=true&query=source_type%3Dgm&master=false&issue=1820313002
CQ_EXTRA_TRYBOTS=client.skia:Test-Ubuntu-GCC-GCE-CPU-AVX2-x86_64-Release-SKNX_NO_SIMD-Trybot
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1820313002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
BUG=skia:
GOLD_TRYBOT_URL= https://gold.skia.org/search2?unt=true&query=source_type%3Dgm&master=false&issue=1556003003
CQ_EXTRA_TRYBOTS=client.skia:Test-Ubuntu-GCC-GCE-CPU-AVX2-x86_64-Release-SKNX_NO_SIMD-Trybot
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1556003003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
https://codereview.chromium.org/1550893002/ )
Reason for revert:
Can't use on XP. :(
Original issue's description:
> Try using std::call_once
>
> Now that we've got std library support, perhaps we should start using it.
> This CL acts as a little canary, and may help fix the linked bug.
>
> I'm not really sure what's going on in the linked bug, but using
> std::call_once over homegrown atomics has to be the right answer...
>
> BUG=chromium:418041
> GOLD_TRYBOT_URL= https://gold.skia.org/search2?unt=true&query=source_type%3Dgm&master=false&issue=1550893002
> CQ_EXTRA_TRYBOTS=client.skia:Test-Ubuntu-GCC-GCE-CPU-AVX2-x86_64-Release-SKNX_NO_SIMD-Trybot
>
> Going to land this ahead of review while the tree is quiet to see how it rolls.
> TBR=herb@google.com
>
> Committed: https://skia.googlesource.com/skia/+/8895b72f789e5dc8bb99cb9727875439005fc919
TBR=herb@google.com,mtklein@chromium.org
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=chromium:418041
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1552333003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Now that we've got std library support, perhaps we should start using it.
This CL acts as a little canary, and may help fix the linked bug.
I'm not really sure what's going on in the linked bug, but using
std::call_once over homegrown atomics has to be the right answer...
BUG=chromium:418041
GOLD_TRYBOT_URL= https://gold.skia.org/search2?unt=true&query=source_type%3Dgm&master=false&issue=1550893002
CQ_EXTRA_TRYBOTS=client.skia:Test-Ubuntu-GCC-GCE-CPU-AVX2-x86_64-Release-SKNX_NO_SIMD-Trybot
Going to land this ahead of review while the tree is quiet to see how it rolls.
TBR=herb@google.com
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1550893002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This gives SkOncePtr a non-trivial destructor that uses std::default_delete
by default. This is overrideable, as seen in SkColorTable.
SK_DECLARE_STATIC_ONCE_PTR still just leaves its pointers hanging at EOP.
BUG=skia:
No public API changes.
TBR=reed@google.com
Committed: https://skia.googlesource.com/skia/+/a1254acdb344174e761f5061c820559dab64a74c
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1322933005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
https://codereview.chromium.org/1322933005/ )
Reason for revert:
Breaks Chrome roll.
obj/skia/ext/skia_chrome.skia_memory_dump_provider.o
does not have -I include/private on its include path, but transitively includes SkMessageBus.h.
Original issue's description:
> Port uses of SkLazyPtr to SkOncePtr.
>
> This gives SkOncePtr a non-trivial destructor that uses std::default_delete
> by default. This is overrideable, as seen in SkColorTable.
>
> SK_DECLARE_STATIC_ONCE_PTR still just leaves its pointers hanging at EOP.
>
> BUG=skia:
>
> No public API changes.
> TBR=reed@google.com
>
> Committed: https://skia.googlesource.com/skia/+/a1254acdb344174e761f5061c820559dab64a74c
TBR=herb@google.com,mtklein@chromium.org
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=skia:
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1334523002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This gives SkOncePtr a non-trivial destructor that uses std::default_delete
by default. This is overrideable, as seen in SkColorTable.
SK_DECLARE_STATIC_ONCE_PTR still just leaves its pointers hanging at EOP.
BUG=skia:
No public API changes.
TBR=reed@google.com
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1322933005
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
DOCS_PREVIEW= https://skia.org/?cl=1316233002
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1316233002
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
DOCS_PREVIEW= https://skia.org/?cl=1316123003
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1316123003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Local SKP nanobenching ranges SSE between 1.05x and 0.87x, much more heavily weighted toward <1.0x ratios (speedups).
I profiled the top five regressions (1.05x-1.01x) and they look like noise. Will follow up after broad bot results.
NEON looks similar but less extreme than SSE changes, ranging between 1.02x and 0.95x, again mostly speedups in 0.99x-0.97x range.
The old code trifurcated into black, opaque-but-not-black, and general versions as a function of the constant src color. I did not see a significant difference between general and opaque-but-not-black, and I don't think a black version would be faster using SIMD. So we have here just one version of the code, the general version.
Somewhat fantastically, I see no pixel diffs on GMs or SKPs.
I will be following up with more CLs for the other procs called by SkBlitMask.
BUG=skia:
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1278253003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Nothing too fancy.
Direction enums become enum classes so they don't get all confused. An
alternative is to create one single Direction enum that both blur and
morphology opts use.
BUG=skia:4117
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1267343004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
+268 -535 lines
I also rearranged the code a little bit to encapsulate itself better,
mostly replacing static helper functions with lambdas. This also
let me merge the SSE2 and SSE4.1 code paths.
BUG=skia:4117
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1264103004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
With this new arrangement, the benefits of inlining sk_memset16/32 have changed.
On x86, they're not significantly different, except for small N<=10 where the inlined code is significantly slower.
On ARMv7 with NEON, our custom code is still significantly faster for N>10 (up to 2x faster). For small N<=10 inlining is still significantly faster.
On ARMv7 without NEON, our custom code is still ridiculously faster (up to 10x) than inlining for N>10, though for small N<=10 inlining is still a little faster.
We were not using the NEON memset16 and memset32 procs on ARMv8. At first blush, that seems to be an oversight, but if so it's an extremely lucky one. The ARMv8 code generation for our memset16/32 procs is total garbage, leaving those methods ~8x slower than just inlining the memset, using the compiler's autovectorization.
So, no need to inline any more on x86, and still inline for N<=10 on ARMv7. Always inline for ARMv8.
BUG=skia:4117
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1270573002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
It's only implemented on x86, where the exisiting benchmark says memcpy() is
faster for all cases:
Timer overhead: 24ns
curr/maxrss loops min median mean max stddev samples config bench
10/10 MB 1 35.9µs 36.2µs 36.2µs 36.6µs 1% ▁▂▄▅▅▃█▄▄▅ nonrendering sk_memcpy32_100000
10/10 MB 13 2.27µs 2.28µs 2.28µs 2.29µs 0% █▄▃▅▃▁▃▅▁▄ nonrendering sk_memcpy32_10000
11/11 MB 677 91.6ns 95.9ns 94.5ns 99.4ns 3% ▅▅▅▅▅█▁▁▁▁ nonrendering sk_memcpy32_1000
11/11 MB 1171 20ns 20.9ns 21.3ns 23.4ns 6% ▁▁▇▃▃▃█▇▃▃ nonrendering sk_memcpy32_100
11/11 MB 1952 14ns 14ns 14.3ns 15.2ns 3% ▁▁██▁▁▁▁▁▁ nonrendering sk_memcpy32_10
11/11 MB 5 33.6µs 33.7µs 34.1µs 35.2µs 2% ▆▇█▁▁▁▁▁▁▁ nonrendering memcpy32_memcpy_100000
11/11 MB 18 2.12µs 2.22µs 2.24µs 2.39µs 5% ▂█▄▇█▄▇▁▁▁ nonrendering memcpy32_memcpy_10000
11/11 MB 1112 87.3ns 87.3ns 89.1ns 93.7ns 3% ▄██▄▁▁▁▁▁▁ nonrendering memcpy32_memcpy_1000
11/11 MB 2124 12.8ns 13.3ns 13.5ns 14.8ns 6% ▁▁▁█▃▃█▇▃▃ nonrendering memcpy32_memcpy_100
11/11 MB 3077 9ns 9.41ns 9.52ns 10.2ns 4% ▃█▁█▃▃▃▃▃▃ nonrendering memcpy32_memcpy_10
(Why? One fewer thing to port to SkOpts.)
BUG=skia:4117
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1256763003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Now that SK_SUPPORT_LEGACY_XFERMODES is unused, tons of code becomes dead.
Nothing is needed in opts/ anymore for x86.
We still do runtime NEON detection, which just duplicates Sk4pxXfermode.
TBR=reed@google.com
BUG=skia:
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1230023011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Also noticed nobody sets SK_DISABLE_BLUR_DIVISION_OPTIMIZATION.
BUG=skia:
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1134513003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Also strips SK_SUPPORT_LEGACY_COLOR32_MATH,
which is no longer needed.
Seems handy to have SkTypes include the relevant intrinsics when
we know we've got them, but I'm not married to it.
Locally this looks like a pointlessly small perf win, but I'm mostly
keen to get all the code together.
BUG=skia:
Committed: https://skia.googlesource.com/skia/+/376e9bc206b69d9190f38dfebb132a8769bbd72b
Committed: https://skia.googlesource.com/skia/+/d65dc0cedd5b50dd407b6ff8fdc39123f11511cc
CQ_EXTRA_TRYBOTS=client.skia.compile:Build-Ubuntu-GCC-Mips-Debug-Android-Trybot
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1104183004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
https://codereview.chromium.org/1104183004/)
Reason for revert:
duh
Original issue's description:
> De-proc Color32
>
> Also strips SK_SUPPORT_LEGACY_COLOR32_MATH,
> which is no longer needed.
>
> Seems handy to have SkTypes include the relevant intrinsics when
> we know we've got them, but I'm not married to it.
>
> Locally this looks like a pointlessly small perf win, but I'm mostly
> keen to get all the code together.
>
> BUG=skia:
>
> Committed: https://skia.googlesource.com/skia/+/376e9bc206b69d9190f38dfebb132a8769bbd72b
>
> Committed: https://skia.googlesource.com/skia/+/d65dc0cedd5b50dd407b6ff8fdc39123f11511cc
TBR=reed@google.com,mtklein@chromium.org
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=skia:
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1102363006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Also strips SK_SUPPORT_LEGACY_COLOR32_MATH,
which is no longer needed.
Seems handy to have SkTypes include the relevant intrinsics when
we know we've got them, but I'm not married to it.
Locally this looks like a pointlessly small perf win, but I'm mostly
keen to get all the code together.
BUG=skia:
Committed: https://skia.googlesource.com/skia/+/376e9bc206b69d9190f38dfebb132a8769bbd72b
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1104183004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
https://codereview.chromium.org/1104183004/)
Reason for revert:
MIPS
Original issue's description:
> De-proc Color32
>
> Also strips SK_SUPPORT_LEGACY_COLOR32_MATH,
> which is no longer needed.
>
> Seems handy to have SkTypes include the relevant intrinsics when
> we know we've got them, but I'm not married to it.
>
> Locally this looks like a pointlessly small perf win, but I'm mostly
> keen to get all the code together.
>
> BUG=skia:
>
> Committed: https://skia.googlesource.com/skia/+/376e9bc206b69d9190f38dfebb132a8769bbd72b
TBR=reed@google.com,mtklein@chromium.org
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=skia:
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1108163002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Also strips SK_SUPPORT_LEGACY_COLOR32_MATH,
which is no longer needed.
Seems handy to have SkTypes include the relevant intrinsics when
we know we've got them, but I'm not married to it.
Locally this looks like a pointlessly small perf win, but I'm mostly
keen to get all the code together.
BUG=skia:
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1104183004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Adds an SSE2 version of the Color32A_D565 function, to replace
the existing SSE4 version. Also does some minor cleanup.
Performance improvement in the following Skia benchmarks.
Measured on Atom Silvermont:
Xfermode_SrcOver - x3
luma_colorfilter_large - x4.6
luma_colorfilter_small - x2
tablebench - ~15%
chart_bw - ~10%
Measured on Corei7 Haswell:
luma_colorfilter_large running SSE2 - x2
luma_colorfilter_large running SSE4 - x2.3
Also improves performance in WPS Office application and 2D subtest of 0xbenchmark on Android.
Signed-off-by: Henrik Smiding <henrik.smiding@intel.com>
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/923523002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We've always been using the portable ColorRect32, so we don't need the
ColorRectProc plumbing.
Furthermore, ColorRect32 doesn't seem to be very important (we're only using
it in the opaque case, which our row-by-row procs already specialize for).
Remove that too.
If we find we want specialization for really narrow rects again, let's put it in
blitRect() directly. It's pretty unlikely we're going to get platform-specific
speedup for blits to non-contiguous memory.
My local SKP comparison is +- 3%... most neutral I've ever seen.
BUG=skia:
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/959873002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Removes the disabled SSE2 optimization of ColorRect32 and deletes
the two files containing the code.
Measured on both Core Haswell and Atom Silvermont, and only got
some miniscule improvement compared to the default implementation.
Also tried to write a new, ultimate, version of this optimization,
but only got ~5% improvement on ColorRect32-heavy tests.
Signed-off-by: Henrik Smiding <henrik.smiding@intel.com>
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/957433002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Adds an SSE4.1 version of the Color32A_D565 function.
Performance improvement in the following benchmarks:
Xfermode_SrcOver - ~100%
luma_colorfilter_large - ~150%
luma_colorfilter_small - ~60%
tablebench - ~10%
chart_bw - ~10%
(Measured on a Atom Silvermont core)
Signed-off-by: Henrik Smiding <henrik.smiding@intel.com>
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/892623002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
(patchset #1 id:1 of https://codereview.chromium.org/873553003/)
Reason for revert:
Reverted the wrong CL.
Original issue's description:
> Revert of SSE4 opaque blend using intrinsics instead of assembly. (patchset #16 id:300001 of https://codereview.chromium.org/874863002/)
>
> Reason for revert:
> This causes a bug on the 'hittestpath' GM on MacMini 4,1
>
> See:
>
> https://gold.skia.org/#/triage/hittestpath?head=0
>
> for details.
>
> Original issue's description:
> > SSE4 opaque blend using intrinsics instead of assembly.
> >
> > Since we had such a hard time with the assembly versions of this blit (to the
> > point that we have them completely disabled everywhere), I thought I'd take
> > a shot at writing a version of the blit using intrinsics.
> >
> > The key feature of SSE4 we're exploiting is that we can use ptest (_mm_test*)
> > to skip the blend when the 16 src pixels we consider each loop are all opaque
> > or all transparent. _mm_shuffle_epi8 from SSSE3 also lends a hand to extract
> > all those alphas.
> >
> > It's worth looking to see if we can backport this type of logic to SSE2 using
> > _mm_movemask_epi8, or up to 32 pixels at a time using AVX.
> >
> > My local performance testing doesn't show this to be an unambiguous win
> > (there are probably microbenchmarks and SKPs where we'd be better off just
> > powering through the blend rather than looking at alphas), but the potential
> > does seem tantalizing enough to let skiaperf vet it on the bots. (< 1.0x is a win.)
> >
> > DM says it draws pixel perfect compare to the old code.
> >
> > Microbenchmarks:
> > bitmap_RGBA_8888_A_source_stripes_two 14us -> 14.4us 1.03x
> > bitmap_RGBA_8888_A_source_stripes_three 14.3us -> 14.5us 1.01x
> > bitmap_RGBA_8888_scale_bilerp 61.9us -> 62.2us 1.01x
> > bitmap_RGBA_8888_update_volatile_scale_rotate_bilerp 102us -> 101us 0.99x
> > bitmap_RGBA_8888_scale_rotate_bilerp 103us -> 101us 0.99x
> > bitmap_RGBA_8888_scale 18.4us -> 18.2us 0.99x
> > bitmap_RGBA_8888_A_scale_rotate_bicubic 71us -> 70us 0.99x
> > bitmap_RGBA_8888_update_scale_rotate_bilerp 103us -> 101us 0.99x
> > bitmap_RGBA_8888_A_scale_rotate_bilerp 112us -> 109us 0.98x
> > bitmap_RGBA_8888_update_volatile 5.72us -> 5.58us 0.98x
> > bitmap_RGBA_8888 5.73us -> 5.58us 0.97x
> > bitmap_RGBA_8888_update 5.78us -> 5.6us 0.97x
> > bitmap_RGBA_8888_A_scale_bilerp 70.7us -> 68us 0.96x
> > bitmap_RGBA_8888_A_scale_bicubic 23.7us -> 21.8us 0.92x
> > bitmap_RGBA_8888_A 13.9us -> 10.9us 0.78x
> > bitmap_RGBA_8888_A_source_opaque 14us -> 6.29us 0.45x
> > bitmap_RGBA_8888_A_source_transparent 14us -> 3.65us 0.26x
> >
> > Running over our ~70 SKP web page captures, this looks like we spend 0.7x
> > the time in S32A_Opaque_BlitRow compared to the SSE2 version, which should
> > be a decent predictor of real-world impact.
> >
> > BUG=chromium:399842
> >
> > Committed: https://skia.googlesource.com/skia/+/04bc91b972417038fecfa87c484771eac2b9b785
> >
> > CQ_EXTRA_TRYBOTS=client.skia:Test-Mac10.6-MacMini4.1-GeForce320M-x86_64-Release-Trybot
> >
> > Committed: https://skia.googlesource.com/skia/+/6dbfb21a6c88af6d94e8c823c3ad559f1a41b493
>
> TBR=henrik.smiding@intel.com,mtklein@google.com,herb@google.com,reed@google.com,thakis@chromium.org,mtklein@chromium.org
> NOPRESUBMIT=true
> NOTREECHECKS=true
> NOTRY=true
> BUG=chromium:399842
>
> Committed: https://skia.googlesource.com/skia/+/4988891a1173cd405bf1c1dd3a3668c451f45e4c
TBR=henrik.smiding@intel.com,mtklein@google.com,herb@google.com,reed@google.com,thakis@chromium.org,mtklein@chromium.org
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=chromium:399842
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/894083002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
#16 id:300001 of https://codereview.chromium.org/874863002/)
Reason for revert:
This causes a bug on the 'hittestpath' GM on MacMini 4,1
See:
https://gold.skia.org/#/triage/hittestpath?head=0
for details.
Original issue's description:
> SSE4 opaque blend using intrinsics instead of assembly.
>
> Since we had such a hard time with the assembly versions of this blit (to the
> point that we have them completely disabled everywhere), I thought I'd take
> a shot at writing a version of the blit using intrinsics.
>
> The key feature of SSE4 we're exploiting is that we can use ptest (_mm_test*)
> to skip the blend when the 16 src pixels we consider each loop are all opaque
> or all transparent. _mm_shuffle_epi8 from SSSE3 also lends a hand to extract
> all those alphas.
>
> It's worth looking to see if we can backport this type of logic to SSE2 using
> _mm_movemask_epi8, or up to 32 pixels at a time using AVX.
>
> My local performance testing doesn't show this to be an unambiguous win
> (there are probably microbenchmarks and SKPs where we'd be better off just
> powering through the blend rather than looking at alphas), but the potential
> does seem tantalizing enough to let skiaperf vet it on the bots. (< 1.0x is a win.)
>
> DM says it draws pixel perfect compare to the old code.
>
> Microbenchmarks:
> bitmap_RGBA_8888_A_source_stripes_two 14us -> 14.4us 1.03x
> bitmap_RGBA_8888_A_source_stripes_three 14.3us -> 14.5us 1.01x
> bitmap_RGBA_8888_scale_bilerp 61.9us -> 62.2us 1.01x
> bitmap_RGBA_8888_update_volatile_scale_rotate_bilerp 102us -> 101us 0.99x
> bitmap_RGBA_8888_scale_rotate_bilerp 103us -> 101us 0.99x
> bitmap_RGBA_8888_scale 18.4us -> 18.2us 0.99x
> bitmap_RGBA_8888_A_scale_rotate_bicubic 71us -> 70us 0.99x
> bitmap_RGBA_8888_update_scale_rotate_bilerp 103us -> 101us 0.99x
> bitmap_RGBA_8888_A_scale_rotate_bilerp 112us -> 109us 0.98x
> bitmap_RGBA_8888_update_volatile 5.72us -> 5.58us 0.98x
> bitmap_RGBA_8888 5.73us -> 5.58us 0.97x
> bitmap_RGBA_8888_update 5.78us -> 5.6us 0.97x
> bitmap_RGBA_8888_A_scale_bilerp 70.7us -> 68us 0.96x
> bitmap_RGBA_8888_A_scale_bicubic 23.7us -> 21.8us 0.92x
> bitmap_RGBA_8888_A 13.9us -> 10.9us 0.78x
> bitmap_RGBA_8888_A_source_opaque 14us -> 6.29us 0.45x
> bitmap_RGBA_8888_A_source_transparent 14us -> 3.65us 0.26x
>
> Running over our ~70 SKP web page captures, this looks like we spend 0.7x
> the time in S32A_Opaque_BlitRow compared to the SSE2 version, which should
> be a decent predictor of real-world impact.
>
> BUG=chromium:399842
>
> Committed: https://skia.googlesource.com/skia/+/04bc91b972417038fecfa87c484771eac2b9b785
>
> CQ_EXTRA_TRYBOTS=client.skia:Test-Mac10.6-MacMini4.1-GeForce320M-x86_64-Release-Trybot
>
> Committed: https://skia.googlesource.com/skia/+/6dbfb21a6c88af6d94e8c823c3ad559f1a41b493
TBR=henrik.smiding@intel.com,mtklein@google.com,herb@google.com,reed@google.com,thakis@chromium.org,mtklein@chromium.org
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=chromium:399842
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/873553003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Since we had such a hard time with the assembly versions of this blit (to the
point that we have them completely disabled everywhere), I thought I'd take
a shot at writing a version of the blit using intrinsics.
The key feature of SSE4 we're exploiting is that we can use ptest (_mm_test*)
to skip the blend when the 16 src pixels we consider each loop are all opaque
or all transparent. _mm_shuffle_epi8 from SSSE3 also lends a hand to extract
all those alphas.
It's worth looking to see if we can backport this type of logic to SSE2 using
_mm_movemask_epi8, or up to 32 pixels at a time using AVX.
My local performance testing doesn't show this to be an unambiguous win
(there are probably microbenchmarks and SKPs where we'd be better off just
powering through the blend rather than looking at alphas), but the potential
does seem tantalizing enough to let skiaperf vet it on the bots. (< 1.0x is a win.)
DM says it draws pixel perfect compare to the old code.
Microbenchmarks:
bitmap_RGBA_8888_A_source_stripes_two 14us -> 14.4us 1.03x
bitmap_RGBA_8888_A_source_stripes_three 14.3us -> 14.5us 1.01x
bitmap_RGBA_8888_scale_bilerp 61.9us -> 62.2us 1.01x
bitmap_RGBA_8888_update_volatile_scale_rotate_bilerp 102us -> 101us 0.99x
bitmap_RGBA_8888_scale_rotate_bilerp 103us -> 101us 0.99x
bitmap_RGBA_8888_scale 18.4us -> 18.2us 0.99x
bitmap_RGBA_8888_A_scale_rotate_bicubic 71us -> 70us 0.99x
bitmap_RGBA_8888_update_scale_rotate_bilerp 103us -> 101us 0.99x
bitmap_RGBA_8888_A_scale_rotate_bilerp 112us -> 109us 0.98x
bitmap_RGBA_8888_update_volatile 5.72us -> 5.58us 0.98x
bitmap_RGBA_8888 5.73us -> 5.58us 0.97x
bitmap_RGBA_8888_update 5.78us -> 5.6us 0.97x
bitmap_RGBA_8888_A_scale_bilerp 70.7us -> 68us 0.96x
bitmap_RGBA_8888_A_scale_bicubic 23.7us -> 21.8us 0.92x
bitmap_RGBA_8888_A 13.9us -> 10.9us 0.78x
bitmap_RGBA_8888_A_source_opaque 14us -> 6.29us 0.45x
bitmap_RGBA_8888_A_source_transparent 14us -> 3.65us 0.26x
Running over our ~70 SKP web page captures, this looks like we spend 0.7x
the time in S32A_Opaque_BlitRow compared to the SSE2 version, which should
be a decent predictor of real-world impact.
BUG=chromium:399842
Committed: https://skia.googlesource.com/skia/+/04bc91b972417038fecfa87c484771eac2b9b785
CQ_EXTRA_TRYBOTS=client.skia:Test-Mac10.6-MacMini4.1-GeForce320M-x86_64-Release-Trybot
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/874863002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
#14 id:260001 of https://codereview.chromium.org/874863002/)
Reason for revert:
This kills Mac 10.6 bots.
FAILED: c++ -MMD -MF obj/src/opts/opts_sse4.SkBlitRow_opts_SSE4.o.d -DSK_INTERNAL -DSK_GAMMA_SRGB -DSK_GAMMA_APPLY_TO_A8 -DSK_SCALAR_TO_FLOAT_EXCLUDED -DSK_ALLOW_STATIC_GLOBAL_INITIALIZERS=1 -DSK_SUPPORT_GPU=1 -DSK_SUPPORT_OPENCL=0 -DSK_FORCE_DISTANCE_FIELD_TEXT=0 -DSK_BUILD_FOR_MAC -DSK_CRASH_HANDLER -DSK_DEVELOPER=1 -I../../src/core -I../../src/utils -I../../include/c -I../../include/config -I../../include/core -I../../include/pathops -I../../include/pipe -I../../include/utils/mac -I../../include/effects -O0 -gdwarf-2 -mmacosx-version-min=10.6 -arch x86_64 -mssse3 -Wall -Wextra -Winit-self -Wpointer-arith -Wsign-compare -Wno-unused-parameter -Wno-invalid-offsetof -msse4.1 -c ../../src/opts/SkBlitRow_opts_SSE4.cpp -o obj/src/opts/opts_sse4.SkBlitRow_opts_SSE4.o
../../src/opts/SkBlitRow_opts_SSE4.cpp:15:27: warning: x86intrin.h: No such file or directory
../../src/opts/SkBlitRow_opts_SSE4.cpp: In function 'void S32A_Opaque_BlitRow32_SSE4(SkPMColor*, const SkPMColor*, int, U8CPU)':
../../src/opts/SkBlitRow_opts_SSE4.cpp:40: error: '_mm_testz_si128' was not declared in this scope
../../src/opts/SkBlitRow_opts_SSE4.cpp:45: error: '_mm_testc_si128' was not declared in this scope
Original issue's description:
> SSE4 opaque blend using intrinsics instead of assembly.
>
> Since we had such a hard time with the assembly versions of this blit (to the
> point that we have them completely disabled everywhere), I thought I'd take
> a shot at writing a version of the blit using intrinsics.
>
> The key feature of SSE4 we're exploiting is that we can use ptest (_mm_test*)
> to skip the blend when the 16 src pixels we consider each loop are all opaque
> or all transparent. _mm_shuffle_epi8 from SSSE3 also lends a hand to extract
> all those alphas.
>
> It's worth looking to see if we can backport this type of logic to SSE2 using
> _mm_movemask_epi8, or up to 32 pixels at a time using AVX.
>
> My local performance testing doesn't show this to be an unambiguous win
> (there are probably microbenchmarks and SKPs where we'd be better off just
> powering through the blend rather than looking at alphas), but the potential
> does seem tantalizing enough to let skiaperf vet it on the bots. (< 1.0x is a win.)
>
> DM says it draws pixel perfect compare to the old code.
>
> Microbenchmarks:
> bitmap_RGBA_8888_A_source_stripes_two 14us -> 14.4us 1.03x
> bitmap_RGBA_8888_A_source_stripes_three 14.3us -> 14.5us 1.01x
> bitmap_RGBA_8888_scale_bilerp 61.9us -> 62.2us 1.01x
> bitmap_RGBA_8888_update_volatile_scale_rotate_bilerp 102us -> 101us 0.99x
> bitmap_RGBA_8888_scale_rotate_bilerp 103us -> 101us 0.99x
> bitmap_RGBA_8888_scale 18.4us -> 18.2us 0.99x
> bitmap_RGBA_8888_A_scale_rotate_bicubic 71us -> 70us 0.99x
> bitmap_RGBA_8888_update_scale_rotate_bilerp 103us -> 101us 0.99x
> bitmap_RGBA_8888_A_scale_rotate_bilerp 112us -> 109us 0.98x
> bitmap_RGBA_8888_update_volatile 5.72us -> 5.58us 0.98x
> bitmap_RGBA_8888 5.73us -> 5.58us 0.97x
> bitmap_RGBA_8888_update 5.78us -> 5.6us 0.97x
> bitmap_RGBA_8888_A_scale_bilerp 70.7us -> 68us 0.96x
> bitmap_RGBA_8888_A_scale_bicubic 23.7us -> 21.8us 0.92x
> bitmap_RGBA_8888_A 13.9us -> 10.9us 0.78x
> bitmap_RGBA_8888_A_source_opaque 14us -> 6.29us 0.45x
> bitmap_RGBA_8888_A_source_transparent 14us -> 3.65us 0.26x
>
> Running over our ~70 SKP web page captures, this looks like we spend 0.7x
> the time in S32A_Opaque_BlitRow compared to the SSE2 version, which should
> be a decent predictor of real-world impact.
>
> BUG=chromium:399842
>
> Committed: https://skia.googlesource.com/skia/+/04bc91b972417038fecfa87c484771eac2b9b785
TBR=henrik.smiding@intel.com,mtklein@google.com,herb@google.com,reed@google.com,thakis@chromium.org,mtklein@chromium.org
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=chromium:399842
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/874033004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Since we had such a hard time with the assembly versions of this blit (to the
point that we have them completely disabled everywhere), I thought I'd take
a shot at writing a version of the blit using intrinsics.
The key feature of SSE4 we're exploiting is that we can use ptest (_mm_test*)
to skip the blend when the 16 src pixels we consider each loop are all opaque
or all transparent. _mm_shuffle_epi8 from SSSE3 also lends a hand to extract
all those alphas.
It's worth looking to see if we can backport this type of logic to SSE2 using
_mm_movemask_epi8, or up to 32 pixels at a time using AVX.
My local performance testing doesn't show this to be an unambiguous win
(there are probably microbenchmarks and SKPs where we'd be better off just
powering through the blend rather than looking at alphas), but the potential
does seem tantalizing enough to let skiaperf vet it on the bots. (< 1.0x is a win.)
DM says it draws pixel perfect compare to the old code.
Microbenchmarks:
bitmap_RGBA_8888_A_source_stripes_two 14us -> 14.4us 1.03x
bitmap_RGBA_8888_A_source_stripes_three 14.3us -> 14.5us 1.01x
bitmap_RGBA_8888_scale_bilerp 61.9us -> 62.2us 1.01x
bitmap_RGBA_8888_update_volatile_scale_rotate_bilerp 102us -> 101us 0.99x
bitmap_RGBA_8888_scale_rotate_bilerp 103us -> 101us 0.99x
bitmap_RGBA_8888_scale 18.4us -> 18.2us 0.99x
bitmap_RGBA_8888_A_scale_rotate_bicubic 71us -> 70us 0.99x
bitmap_RGBA_8888_update_scale_rotate_bilerp 103us -> 101us 0.99x
bitmap_RGBA_8888_A_scale_rotate_bilerp 112us -> 109us 0.98x
bitmap_RGBA_8888_update_volatile 5.72us -> 5.58us 0.98x
bitmap_RGBA_8888 5.73us -> 5.58us 0.97x
bitmap_RGBA_8888_update 5.78us -> 5.6us 0.97x
bitmap_RGBA_8888_A_scale_bilerp 70.7us -> 68us 0.96x
bitmap_RGBA_8888_A_scale_bicubic 23.7us -> 21.8us 0.92x
bitmap_RGBA_8888_A 13.9us -> 10.9us 0.78x
bitmap_RGBA_8888_A_source_opaque 14us -> 6.29us 0.45x
bitmap_RGBA_8888_A_source_transparent 14us -> 3.65us 0.26x
Running over our ~70 SKP web page captures, this looks like we spend 0.7x
the time in S32A_Opaque_BlitRow compared to the SSE2 version, which should
be a decent predictor of real-world impact.
BUG=chromium:399842
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/874863002
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
BUG=skia:
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/845303005
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
BUG=skia:3302
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/847443003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
With this CL, related nanobench can be improved for 565 config.
bitmap_BGRA_8888_update_scale_bilerp 76.1us -> 46.7us 0.61x
bitmap_BGRA_8888_scale_bilerp 78.7us -> 47us 0.6x
bitmap_BGRA_8888_update_volatile_scale_bilerp 82.7us -> 46.9us 0.57x
BUG=skia:
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/788853002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
With this CL, related nanobench can be improved for 565 config.
bitmap_BGRA_8888_scale_rotate_bilerp 115us -> 70.5us 0.61x
bitmap_BGRA_8888_update_volatile_scale_rotate_bilerp 115us -> 70.5us 0.61x
bitmap_BGRA_8888_update_scale_rotate_bilerp 112us -> 68us 0.6x
BUG=skia:
Committed: https://skia.googlesource.com/skia/+/45a05780867a06b9f8a8d5240cf6c5d5a2c15a35
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/773753002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
id:40001 of https://codereview.chromium.org/773753002/)
Reason for revert:
breaks build when not using SSE3, since the two method definitions differ in parameter types (typo)
Original issue's description:
> Add SSSE3 acceleration for S32_D16_filter_DXDY
>
> With this CL, related nanobench can be improved for 565 config.
> bitmap_BGRA_8888_scale_rotate_bilerp 115us -> 70.5us 0.61x
> bitmap_BGRA_8888_update_volatile_scale_rotate_bilerp 115us -> 70.5us 0.61x
> bitmap_BGRA_8888_update_scale_rotate_bilerp 112us -> 68us 0.6x
>
>
> BUG=skia:
>
> Committed: https://skia.googlesource.com/skia/+/45a05780867a06b9f8a8d5240cf6c5d5a2c15a35
TBR=mtklein@google.com,qkmiao@gmail.com,qiankun.miao@intel.com
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=skia:
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/761103003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
With this CL, related nanobench can be improved for 565 config.
bitmap_BGRA_8888_scale_rotate_bilerp 115us -> 70.5us 0.61x
bitmap_BGRA_8888_update_volatile_scale_rotate_bilerp 115us -> 70.5us 0.61x
bitmap_BGRA_8888_update_scale_rotate_bilerp 112us -> 68us 0.6x
BUG=skia:
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/773753002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Local statics are not thread safe in Chrome. Use an SkLazyPtr instead.
See https://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=418041
BUG=418041
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/655573002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
With SSE2, bitmap_BGRA_8888_A_scale_rotate_bicubic gains about 40%
performance improvement on desktop i7-3770.
BUG=skia:
Committed: https://skia.googlesource.com/skia/+/b381fa10d8079c58928058bb8a6db32b39f05e51
CQ_EXTRA_TRYBOTS=tryserver.skia:Test-Mac10.6-MacMini4.1-GeForce320M-x86_64-Release-Trybot
R=mtklein@google.com, humper@google.com
Author: qiankun.miao@intel.com
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/525283002
|