aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffhomepage
path: root/src/opts/SkBlitRow_opts_SSE4.cpp
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAge
* add/fix copyrightsGravatar reed2015-06-26
| | | | | | | BUG=skia: TBR= Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1212393002
* Replace SSE optimization of Color32A_D565Gravatar henrik.smiding2015-03-20
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Adds an SSE2 version of the Color32A_D565 function, to replace the existing SSE4 version. Also does some minor cleanup. Performance improvement in the following Skia benchmarks. Measured on Atom Silvermont: Xfermode_SrcOver - x3 luma_colorfilter_large - x4.6 luma_colorfilter_small - x2 tablebench - ~15% chart_bw - ~10% Measured on Corei7 Haswell: luma_colorfilter_large running SSE2 - x2 luma_colorfilter_large running SSE4 - x2.3 Also improves performance in WPS Office application and 2D subtest of 0xbenchmark on Android. Signed-off-by: Henrik Smiding <henrik.smiding@intel.com> Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/923523002
* Add SSE optimization of Color32A_D565Gravatar henrik.smiding2015-02-10
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Adds an SSE4.1 version of the Color32A_D565 function. Performance improvement in the following benchmarks: Xfermode_SrcOver - ~100% luma_colorfilter_large - ~150% luma_colorfilter_small - ~60% tablebench - ~10% chart_bw - ~10% (Measured on a Atom Silvermont core) Signed-off-by: Henrik Smiding <henrik.smiding@intel.com> Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/892623002
* Revert of Revert of SSE4 opaque blend using intrinsics instead of assembly. ↵Gravatar stephana2015-02-02
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (patchset #1 id:1 of https://codereview.chromium.org/873553003/) Reason for revert: Reverted the wrong CL. Original issue's description: > Revert of SSE4 opaque blend using intrinsics instead of assembly. (patchset #16 id:300001 of https://codereview.chromium.org/874863002/) > > Reason for revert: > This causes a bug on the 'hittestpath' GM on MacMini 4,1 > > See: > > https://gold.skia.org/#/triage/hittestpath?head=0 > > for details. > > Original issue's description: > > SSE4 opaque blend using intrinsics instead of assembly. > > > > Since we had such a hard time with the assembly versions of this blit (to the > > point that we have them completely disabled everywhere), I thought I'd take > > a shot at writing a version of the blit using intrinsics. > > > > The key feature of SSE4 we're exploiting is that we can use ptest (_mm_test*) > > to skip the blend when the 16 src pixels we consider each loop are all opaque > > or all transparent. _mm_shuffle_epi8 from SSSE3 also lends a hand to extract > > all those alphas. > > > > It's worth looking to see if we can backport this type of logic to SSE2 using > > _mm_movemask_epi8, or up to 32 pixels at a time using AVX. > > > > My local performance testing doesn't show this to be an unambiguous win > > (there are probably microbenchmarks and SKPs where we'd be better off just > > powering through the blend rather than looking at alphas), but the potential > > does seem tantalizing enough to let skiaperf vet it on the bots. (< 1.0x is a win.) > > > > DM says it draws pixel perfect compare to the old code. > > > > Microbenchmarks: > > bitmap_RGBA_8888_A_source_stripes_two 14us -> 14.4us 1.03x > > bitmap_RGBA_8888_A_source_stripes_three 14.3us -> 14.5us 1.01x > > bitmap_RGBA_8888_scale_bilerp 61.9us -> 62.2us 1.01x > > bitmap_RGBA_8888_update_volatile_scale_rotate_bilerp 102us -> 101us 0.99x > > bitmap_RGBA_8888_scale_rotate_bilerp 103us -> 101us 0.99x > > bitmap_RGBA_8888_scale 18.4us -> 18.2us 0.99x > > bitmap_RGBA_8888_A_scale_rotate_bicubic 71us -> 70us 0.99x > > bitmap_RGBA_8888_update_scale_rotate_bilerp 103us -> 101us 0.99x > > bitmap_RGBA_8888_A_scale_rotate_bilerp 112us -> 109us 0.98x > > bitmap_RGBA_8888_update_volatile 5.72us -> 5.58us 0.98x > > bitmap_RGBA_8888 5.73us -> 5.58us 0.97x > > bitmap_RGBA_8888_update 5.78us -> 5.6us 0.97x > > bitmap_RGBA_8888_A_scale_bilerp 70.7us -> 68us 0.96x > > bitmap_RGBA_8888_A_scale_bicubic 23.7us -> 21.8us 0.92x > > bitmap_RGBA_8888_A 13.9us -> 10.9us 0.78x > > bitmap_RGBA_8888_A_source_opaque 14us -> 6.29us 0.45x > > bitmap_RGBA_8888_A_source_transparent 14us -> 3.65us 0.26x > > > > Running over our ~70 SKP web page captures, this looks like we spend 0.7x > > the time in S32A_Opaque_BlitRow compared to the SSE2 version, which should > > be a decent predictor of real-world impact. > > > > BUG=chromium:399842 > > > > Committed: https://skia.googlesource.com/skia/+/04bc91b972417038fecfa87c484771eac2b9b785 > > > > CQ_EXTRA_TRYBOTS=client.skia:Test-Mac10.6-MacMini4.1-GeForce320M-x86_64-Release-Trybot > > > > Committed: https://skia.googlesource.com/skia/+/6dbfb21a6c88af6d94e8c823c3ad559f1a41b493 > > TBR=henrik.smiding@intel.com,mtklein@google.com,herb@google.com,reed@google.com,thakis@chromium.org,mtklein@chromium.org > NOPRESUBMIT=true > NOTREECHECKS=true > NOTRY=true > BUG=chromium:399842 > > Committed: https://skia.googlesource.com/skia/+/4988891a1173cd405bf1c1dd3a3668c451f45e4c TBR=henrik.smiding@intel.com,mtklein@google.com,herb@google.com,reed@google.com,thakis@chromium.org,mtklein@chromium.org NOPRESUBMIT=true NOTREECHECKS=true NOTRY=true BUG=chromium:399842 Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/894083002
* Revert of SSE4 opaque blend using intrinsics instead of assembly. (patchset ↵Gravatar stephana2015-02-02
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | #16 id:300001 of https://codereview.chromium.org/874863002/) Reason for revert: This causes a bug on the 'hittestpath' GM on MacMini 4,1 See: https://gold.skia.org/#/triage/hittestpath?head=0 for details. Original issue's description: > SSE4 opaque blend using intrinsics instead of assembly. > > Since we had such a hard time with the assembly versions of this blit (to the > point that we have them completely disabled everywhere), I thought I'd take > a shot at writing a version of the blit using intrinsics. > > The key feature of SSE4 we're exploiting is that we can use ptest (_mm_test*) > to skip the blend when the 16 src pixels we consider each loop are all opaque > or all transparent. _mm_shuffle_epi8 from SSSE3 also lends a hand to extract > all those alphas. > > It's worth looking to see if we can backport this type of logic to SSE2 using > _mm_movemask_epi8, or up to 32 pixels at a time using AVX. > > My local performance testing doesn't show this to be an unambiguous win > (there are probably microbenchmarks and SKPs where we'd be better off just > powering through the blend rather than looking at alphas), but the potential > does seem tantalizing enough to let skiaperf vet it on the bots. (< 1.0x is a win.) > > DM says it draws pixel perfect compare to the old code. > > Microbenchmarks: > bitmap_RGBA_8888_A_source_stripes_two 14us -> 14.4us 1.03x > bitmap_RGBA_8888_A_source_stripes_three 14.3us -> 14.5us 1.01x > bitmap_RGBA_8888_scale_bilerp 61.9us -> 62.2us 1.01x > bitmap_RGBA_8888_update_volatile_scale_rotate_bilerp 102us -> 101us 0.99x > bitmap_RGBA_8888_scale_rotate_bilerp 103us -> 101us 0.99x > bitmap_RGBA_8888_scale 18.4us -> 18.2us 0.99x > bitmap_RGBA_8888_A_scale_rotate_bicubic 71us -> 70us 0.99x > bitmap_RGBA_8888_update_scale_rotate_bilerp 103us -> 101us 0.99x > bitmap_RGBA_8888_A_scale_rotate_bilerp 112us -> 109us 0.98x > bitmap_RGBA_8888_update_volatile 5.72us -> 5.58us 0.98x > bitmap_RGBA_8888 5.73us -> 5.58us 0.97x > bitmap_RGBA_8888_update 5.78us -> 5.6us 0.97x > bitmap_RGBA_8888_A_scale_bilerp 70.7us -> 68us 0.96x > bitmap_RGBA_8888_A_scale_bicubic 23.7us -> 21.8us 0.92x > bitmap_RGBA_8888_A 13.9us -> 10.9us 0.78x > bitmap_RGBA_8888_A_source_opaque 14us -> 6.29us 0.45x > bitmap_RGBA_8888_A_source_transparent 14us -> 3.65us 0.26x > > Running over our ~70 SKP web page captures, this looks like we spend 0.7x > the time in S32A_Opaque_BlitRow compared to the SSE2 version, which should > be a decent predictor of real-world impact. > > BUG=chromium:399842 > > Committed: https://skia.googlesource.com/skia/+/04bc91b972417038fecfa87c484771eac2b9b785 > > CQ_EXTRA_TRYBOTS=client.skia:Test-Mac10.6-MacMini4.1-GeForce320M-x86_64-Release-Trybot > > Committed: https://skia.googlesource.com/skia/+/6dbfb21a6c88af6d94e8c823c3ad559f1a41b493 TBR=henrik.smiding@intel.com,mtklein@google.com,herb@google.com,reed@google.com,thakis@chromium.org,mtklein@chromium.org NOPRESUBMIT=true NOTREECHECKS=true NOTRY=true BUG=chromium:399842 Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/873553003
* add a paranoid assertGravatar mtklein2015-01-28
| | | | | | | | NOTREECHECKS=true BUG=chromium:399842 Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/881253003
* SSE4 opaque blend using intrinsics instead of assembly.Gravatar mtklein2015-01-27
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Since we had such a hard time with the assembly versions of this blit (to the point that we have them completely disabled everywhere), I thought I'd take a shot at writing a version of the blit using intrinsics. The key feature of SSE4 we're exploiting is that we can use ptest (_mm_test*) to skip the blend when the 16 src pixels we consider each loop are all opaque or all transparent. _mm_shuffle_epi8 from SSSE3 also lends a hand to extract all those alphas. It's worth looking to see if we can backport this type of logic to SSE2 using _mm_movemask_epi8, or up to 32 pixels at a time using AVX. My local performance testing doesn't show this to be an unambiguous win (there are probably microbenchmarks and SKPs where we'd be better off just powering through the blend rather than looking at alphas), but the potential does seem tantalizing enough to let skiaperf vet it on the bots. (< 1.0x is a win.) DM says it draws pixel perfect compare to the old code. Microbenchmarks: bitmap_RGBA_8888_A_source_stripes_two 14us -> 14.4us 1.03x bitmap_RGBA_8888_A_source_stripes_three 14.3us -> 14.5us 1.01x bitmap_RGBA_8888_scale_bilerp 61.9us -> 62.2us 1.01x bitmap_RGBA_8888_update_volatile_scale_rotate_bilerp 102us -> 101us 0.99x bitmap_RGBA_8888_scale_rotate_bilerp 103us -> 101us 0.99x bitmap_RGBA_8888_scale 18.4us -> 18.2us 0.99x bitmap_RGBA_8888_A_scale_rotate_bicubic 71us -> 70us 0.99x bitmap_RGBA_8888_update_scale_rotate_bilerp 103us -> 101us 0.99x bitmap_RGBA_8888_A_scale_rotate_bilerp 112us -> 109us 0.98x bitmap_RGBA_8888_update_volatile 5.72us -> 5.58us 0.98x bitmap_RGBA_8888 5.73us -> 5.58us 0.97x bitmap_RGBA_8888_update 5.78us -> 5.6us 0.97x bitmap_RGBA_8888_A_scale_bilerp 70.7us -> 68us 0.96x bitmap_RGBA_8888_A_scale_bicubic 23.7us -> 21.8us 0.92x bitmap_RGBA_8888_A 13.9us -> 10.9us 0.78x bitmap_RGBA_8888_A_source_opaque 14us -> 6.29us 0.45x bitmap_RGBA_8888_A_source_transparent 14us -> 3.65us 0.26x Running over our ~70 SKP web page captures, this looks like we spend 0.7x the time in S32A_Opaque_BlitRow compared to the SSE2 version, which should be a decent predictor of real-world impact. BUG=chromium:399842 Committed: https://skia.googlesource.com/skia/+/04bc91b972417038fecfa87c484771eac2b9b785 CQ_EXTRA_TRYBOTS=client.skia:Test-Mac10.6-MacMini4.1-GeForce320M-x86_64-Release-Trybot Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/874863002
* Revert of SSE4 opaque blend using intrinsics instead of assembly. (patchset ↵Gravatar bungeman2015-01-26
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | #14 id:260001 of https://codereview.chromium.org/874863002/) Reason for revert: This kills Mac 10.6 bots. FAILED: c++ -MMD -MF obj/src/opts/opts_sse4.SkBlitRow_opts_SSE4.o.d -DSK_INTERNAL -DSK_GAMMA_SRGB -DSK_GAMMA_APPLY_TO_A8 -DSK_SCALAR_TO_FLOAT_EXCLUDED -DSK_ALLOW_STATIC_GLOBAL_INITIALIZERS=1 -DSK_SUPPORT_GPU=1 -DSK_SUPPORT_OPENCL=0 -DSK_FORCE_DISTANCE_FIELD_TEXT=0 -DSK_BUILD_FOR_MAC -DSK_CRASH_HANDLER -DSK_DEVELOPER=1 -I../../src/core -I../../src/utils -I../../include/c -I../../include/config -I../../include/core -I../../include/pathops -I../../include/pipe -I../../include/utils/mac -I../../include/effects -O0 -gdwarf-2 -mmacosx-version-min=10.6 -arch x86_64 -mssse3 -Wall -Wextra -Winit-self -Wpointer-arith -Wsign-compare -Wno-unused-parameter -Wno-invalid-offsetof -msse4.1 -c ../../src/opts/SkBlitRow_opts_SSE4.cpp -o obj/src/opts/opts_sse4.SkBlitRow_opts_SSE4.o ../../src/opts/SkBlitRow_opts_SSE4.cpp:15:27: warning: x86intrin.h: No such file or directory ../../src/opts/SkBlitRow_opts_SSE4.cpp: In function 'void S32A_Opaque_BlitRow32_SSE4(SkPMColor*, const SkPMColor*, int, U8CPU)': ../../src/opts/SkBlitRow_opts_SSE4.cpp:40: error: '_mm_testz_si128' was not declared in this scope ../../src/opts/SkBlitRow_opts_SSE4.cpp:45: error: '_mm_testc_si128' was not declared in this scope Original issue's description: > SSE4 opaque blend using intrinsics instead of assembly. > > Since we had such a hard time with the assembly versions of this blit (to the > point that we have them completely disabled everywhere), I thought I'd take > a shot at writing a version of the blit using intrinsics. > > The key feature of SSE4 we're exploiting is that we can use ptest (_mm_test*) > to skip the blend when the 16 src pixels we consider each loop are all opaque > or all transparent. _mm_shuffle_epi8 from SSSE3 also lends a hand to extract > all those alphas. > > It's worth looking to see if we can backport this type of logic to SSE2 using > _mm_movemask_epi8, or up to 32 pixels at a time using AVX. > > My local performance testing doesn't show this to be an unambiguous win > (there are probably microbenchmarks and SKPs where we'd be better off just > powering through the blend rather than looking at alphas), but the potential > does seem tantalizing enough to let skiaperf vet it on the bots. (< 1.0x is a win.) > > DM says it draws pixel perfect compare to the old code. > > Microbenchmarks: > bitmap_RGBA_8888_A_source_stripes_two 14us -> 14.4us 1.03x > bitmap_RGBA_8888_A_source_stripes_three 14.3us -> 14.5us 1.01x > bitmap_RGBA_8888_scale_bilerp 61.9us -> 62.2us 1.01x > bitmap_RGBA_8888_update_volatile_scale_rotate_bilerp 102us -> 101us 0.99x > bitmap_RGBA_8888_scale_rotate_bilerp 103us -> 101us 0.99x > bitmap_RGBA_8888_scale 18.4us -> 18.2us 0.99x > bitmap_RGBA_8888_A_scale_rotate_bicubic 71us -> 70us 0.99x > bitmap_RGBA_8888_update_scale_rotate_bilerp 103us -> 101us 0.99x > bitmap_RGBA_8888_A_scale_rotate_bilerp 112us -> 109us 0.98x > bitmap_RGBA_8888_update_volatile 5.72us -> 5.58us 0.98x > bitmap_RGBA_8888 5.73us -> 5.58us 0.97x > bitmap_RGBA_8888_update 5.78us -> 5.6us 0.97x > bitmap_RGBA_8888_A_scale_bilerp 70.7us -> 68us 0.96x > bitmap_RGBA_8888_A_scale_bicubic 23.7us -> 21.8us 0.92x > bitmap_RGBA_8888_A 13.9us -> 10.9us 0.78x > bitmap_RGBA_8888_A_source_opaque 14us -> 6.29us 0.45x > bitmap_RGBA_8888_A_source_transparent 14us -> 3.65us 0.26x > > Running over our ~70 SKP web page captures, this looks like we spend 0.7x > the time in S32A_Opaque_BlitRow compared to the SSE2 version, which should > be a decent predictor of real-world impact. > > BUG=chromium:399842 > > Committed: https://skia.googlesource.com/skia/+/04bc91b972417038fecfa87c484771eac2b9b785 TBR=henrik.smiding@intel.com,mtklein@google.com,herb@google.com,reed@google.com,thakis@chromium.org,mtklein@chromium.org NOPRESUBMIT=true NOTREECHECKS=true NOTRY=true BUG=chromium:399842 Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/874033004
* SSE4 opaque blend using intrinsics instead of assembly.Gravatar mtklein2015-01-26
Since we had such a hard time with the assembly versions of this blit (to the point that we have them completely disabled everywhere), I thought I'd take a shot at writing a version of the blit using intrinsics. The key feature of SSE4 we're exploiting is that we can use ptest (_mm_test*) to skip the blend when the 16 src pixels we consider each loop are all opaque or all transparent. _mm_shuffle_epi8 from SSSE3 also lends a hand to extract all those alphas. It's worth looking to see if we can backport this type of logic to SSE2 using _mm_movemask_epi8, or up to 32 pixels at a time using AVX. My local performance testing doesn't show this to be an unambiguous win (there are probably microbenchmarks and SKPs where we'd be better off just powering through the blend rather than looking at alphas), but the potential does seem tantalizing enough to let skiaperf vet it on the bots. (< 1.0x is a win.) DM says it draws pixel perfect compare to the old code. Microbenchmarks: bitmap_RGBA_8888_A_source_stripes_two 14us -> 14.4us 1.03x bitmap_RGBA_8888_A_source_stripes_three 14.3us -> 14.5us 1.01x bitmap_RGBA_8888_scale_bilerp 61.9us -> 62.2us 1.01x bitmap_RGBA_8888_update_volatile_scale_rotate_bilerp 102us -> 101us 0.99x bitmap_RGBA_8888_scale_rotate_bilerp 103us -> 101us 0.99x bitmap_RGBA_8888_scale 18.4us -> 18.2us 0.99x bitmap_RGBA_8888_A_scale_rotate_bicubic 71us -> 70us 0.99x bitmap_RGBA_8888_update_scale_rotate_bilerp 103us -> 101us 0.99x bitmap_RGBA_8888_A_scale_rotate_bilerp 112us -> 109us 0.98x bitmap_RGBA_8888_update_volatile 5.72us -> 5.58us 0.98x bitmap_RGBA_8888 5.73us -> 5.58us 0.97x bitmap_RGBA_8888_update 5.78us -> 5.6us 0.97x bitmap_RGBA_8888_A_scale_bilerp 70.7us -> 68us 0.96x bitmap_RGBA_8888_A_scale_bicubic 23.7us -> 21.8us 0.92x bitmap_RGBA_8888_A 13.9us -> 10.9us 0.78x bitmap_RGBA_8888_A_source_opaque 14us -> 6.29us 0.45x bitmap_RGBA_8888_A_source_transparent 14us -> 3.65us 0.26x Running over our ~70 SKP web page captures, this looks like we spend 0.7x the time in S32A_Opaque_BlitRow compared to the SSE2 version, which should be a decent predictor of real-world impact. BUG=chromium:399842 Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/874863002
generated by cgit v1.2.3 (git 2.39.1) at 2024-07-15 12:36:23 +0000