| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This reverts commit 27b3d272a8fcce24813212f5816b177090111ec6.
Reason for revert: guard has landed in android
Original change's description:
> Revert "Experimental blur code with 32 bit fix."
>
> This reverts commit d4b2c537d058ad4cb890ba116d00aa86c3416c08.
>
> Reason for revert: speculative fix for android-roll
>
> java.lang.AssertionError: expected:<0> but was:<255>
> at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:88)
> at org.junit.Assert.failNotEquals(Assert.java:834)
> at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:645)
> at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:631)
> at android.graphics.cts.BlurMaskFilterTest.verifyColor(BlurMaskFilterTest.java:79)
> at android.graphics.cts.BlurMaskFilterTest.verifyQuadrants(BlurMaskFilterTest.java:72)
> at android.graphics.cts.BlurMaskFilterTest.testBlurMaskFilter(BlurMaskFilterTest.java:56)
>
> Original change's description:
> > Experimental blur code with 32 bit fix.
> >
> > This uses a new method of blurring that runs the three
> > passes of the box filter in a single pass. This implementation
> > currently only does 1x1 pixel at a time, but it should be simple
> > to expand to 4x4 pixels at a time.
> >
> > On the blur_10_normal_high_quality benchmark, the new is 7% faster
> > than the old code. For the blur_100.50_normal_high_quality
> > benchmark, the new code is 11% slower.
> >
> > Bug: skia:
> > Change-Id: I847270906b0ceac1dfbf43ab5446756689ef660f
> > Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/22700
> > Reviewed-by: Mike Reed <reed@google.com>
> > Commit-Queue: Herb Derby <herb@google.com>
>
> TBR=herb@google.com,reed@google.com
>
> Change-Id: Ie84f6bf8872cae08c06d679f0c2f2e6c3d8a02a2
> No-Presubmit: true
> No-Tree-Checks: true
> No-Try: true
> Bug: skia:
> Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/22880
> Reviewed-by: Mike Reed <reed@google.com>
> Commit-Queue: Mike Reed <reed@google.com>
TBR=herb@google.com,reed@google.com
Change-Id: I393d1c05f83ccf98137201bc7b4e7d8e8b0e8742
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
Bug: skia:
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/23121
Reviewed-by: Mike Reed <reed@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Mike Reed <reed@google.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This reverts commit d4b2c537d058ad4cb890ba116d00aa86c3416c08.
Reason for revert: speculative fix for android-roll
java.lang.AssertionError: expected:<0> but was:<255>
at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:88)
at org.junit.Assert.failNotEquals(Assert.java:834)
at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:645)
at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:631)
at android.graphics.cts.BlurMaskFilterTest.verifyColor(BlurMaskFilterTest.java:79)
at android.graphics.cts.BlurMaskFilterTest.verifyQuadrants(BlurMaskFilterTest.java:72)
at android.graphics.cts.BlurMaskFilterTest.testBlurMaskFilter(BlurMaskFilterTest.java:56)
Original change's description:
> Experimental blur code with 32 bit fix.
>
> This uses a new method of blurring that runs the three
> passes of the box filter in a single pass. This implementation
> currently only does 1x1 pixel at a time, but it should be simple
> to expand to 4x4 pixels at a time.
>
> On the blur_10_normal_high_quality benchmark, the new is 7% faster
> than the old code. For the blur_100.50_normal_high_quality
> benchmark, the new code is 11% slower.
>
> Bug: skia:
> Change-Id: I847270906b0ceac1dfbf43ab5446756689ef660f
> Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/22700
> Reviewed-by: Mike Reed <reed@google.com>
> Commit-Queue: Herb Derby <herb@google.com>
TBR=herb@google.com,reed@google.com
Change-Id: Ie84f6bf8872cae08c06d679f0c2f2e6c3d8a02a2
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
Bug: skia:
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/22880
Reviewed-by: Mike Reed <reed@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Mike Reed <reed@google.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This uses a new method of blurring that runs the three
passes of the box filter in a single pass. This implementation
currently only does 1x1 pixel at a time, but it should be simple
to expand to 4x4 pixels at a time.
On the blur_10_normal_high_quality benchmark, the new is 7% faster
than the old code. For the blur_100.50_normal_high_quality
benchmark, the new code is 11% slower.
Bug: skia:
Change-Id: I847270906b0ceac1dfbf43ab5446756689ef660f
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/22700
Reviewed-by: Mike Reed <reed@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Herb Derby <herb@google.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This reverts commit d96ed9d0def2d660f537e4ab5c79e9e66470ee22.
Reason for revert: dm crashing
https://luci-milo.appspot.com/swarming/task/374d82c1d1263910/steps/symbolized_dm/0/stdout
Likely culprit:
unit test BlurDrawing
Stack trace:
/mnt/pd0/s/w/ir/out/Debug/dm(+0x2440eb) [0x568770eb]
linux-gate.so.1(__kernel_sigreturn+0) [0xf7714ca0]
/mnt/pd0/s/w/ir/out/Debug/dm(_ZNK16SkMaskBlurFilter11blurOneScanENS_10FilterInfoEPKhjS2_PhjS3_+0x236) [0x5766301e]
/mnt/pd0/s/w/ir/out/Debug/dm(_ZNK16SkMaskBlurFilter4blurERK6SkMaskPS0_+0x285) [0x57663491]
/mnt/pd0/s/w/ir/out/Debug/dm(_ZN10SkBlurMask7BoxBlurEP6SkMaskRKS0_f11SkBlurStyle13SkBlurQualityP8SkIPointb+0x5c) [0x5720d48e]
/mnt/pd0/s/w/ir/out/Debug/dm(_ZNK20SkBlurMaskFilterImpl10filterMaskEP6SkMaskRKS0_RK8SkMatrixP8SkIPoint+0x67) [0x5720e427]
/mnt/pd0/s/w/ir/out/Debug/dm(_ZNK20SkBlurMaskFilterImpl17filterRectsToNineEPK6SkRectiRK8SkMatrixRK7SkIRectPN12SkMaskFilter9NinePatchE+0x579) [0x5721a247]
/mnt/pd0/s/w/ir/out/Debug/dm(_ZNK12SkMaskFilter10filterPathERK6SkPathRK8SkMatrixRK12SkRasterClipP9SkBlitterN11SkStrokeRec9InitStyleE+0xf6) [0x5706c2bc]
/mnt/pd0/s/w/ir/out/Debug/dm(_ZNK6SkDraw11drawDevPathERK6SkPathRK7SkPaintbP9SkBlitterb+0x1bb) [0x57034f1b]
/mnt/pd0/s/w/ir/out/Debug/dm(_ZNK6SkDraw8drawPathERK6SkPathRK7SkPaintPK8SkMatrixbbP9SkBlitter+0x47f) [0x57035dd3]
/mnt/pd0/s/w/ir/out/Debug/dm(_ZN14SkBitmapDevice8drawPathERK6SkPathRK7SkPaintPK8SkMatrixb+0x6e) [0x56f937fc]
/mnt/pd0/s/w/ir/out/Debug/dm(_ZN8SkCanvas10onDrawPathERK6SkPathRK7SkPaint+0x39d) [0x56fb12e5]
/mnt/pd0/s/w/ir/out/Debug/dm(_ZN8SkCanvas8drawPathERK6SkPathRK7SkPaint+0x18) [0x56fad926]
/mnt/pd0/s/w/ir/out/Debug/dm(+0x3f71b3) [0x56a2a1b3]
/mnt/pd0/s/w/ir/out/Debug/dm(+0x2450bd) [0x568780bd]
/mnt/pd0/s/w/ir/out/Debug/dm(+0x2450fb) [0x568780fb]
/mnt/pd0/s/w/ir/out/Debug/dm(+0xae53e7) [0x571183e7]
/mnt/pd0/s/w/ir/out/Debug/dm(_ZNKSt8functionIFvvEEclEv+0x20) [0x569f98de]
/mnt/pd0/s/w/ir/out/Debug/dm(_ZN12SkThreadPool4LoopEPv+0x298) [0x57045b2f]
/mnt/pd0/s/w/ir/out/Debug/dm(+0xbbd92c) [0x571f092c]
/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0(+0x627a) [0xf76e827a]
/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(clone+0x66) [0xf70ecb56]
Segmentation fault
Original change's description:
> Experimental blur code.
>
> This uses a new method of blurring that runs the three
> passes of the box filter in a single pass. This implementation
> currently only does 1x1 pixel at a time, but it should be simple
> to expand to 4x4 pixels at a time.
>
> On the blur_10_normal_high_quality benchmark, the new is 7% faster
> than the old code. For the blur_100.50_normal_high_quality
> benchmark, the new code is 11% slower.
>
> Change-Id: Iea37294abc7c27de5ad569adf8bc62df77eafd02
> Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/21739
> Commit-Queue: Herb Derby <herb@google.com>
> Reviewed-by: Mike Reed <reed@google.com>
TBR=herb@google.com,reed@google.com
Change-Id: I9e896c548d0a4cd3308d6a311c8bd16719a08a85
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/22421
Reviewed-by: Florin Malita <fmalita@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Florin Malita <fmalita@google.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This uses a new method of blurring that runs the three
passes of the box filter in a single pass. This implementation
currently only does 1x1 pixel at a time, but it should be simple
to expand to 4x4 pixels at a time.
On the blur_10_normal_high_quality benchmark, the new is 7% faster
than the old code. For the blur_100.50_normal_high_quality
benchmark, the new code is 11% slower.
Change-Id: Iea37294abc7c27de5ad569adf8bc62df77eafd02
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/21739
Commit-Queue: Herb Derby <herb@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Mike Reed <reed@google.com>
|
|
BUG=skia:
GOLD_TRYBOT_URL= https://gold.skia.org/search?issue=2293963002
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2293963002
|