| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
BUG=skia:
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1123173005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Prevents some PRESUBMIT errors.
TBR=mtklein@google.com
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1035523003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This will silence these warnings:
../../third_party/externals/nanomsg/src/core/global.c:162:34: warning: missing field 'unused' initializer [-Wmissing-field-initializers]
static struct nn_global self = {0};
../../third_party/externals/nanomsg/src/utils/clock.c:44:61: warning: missing field 'denom' initializer [-Wmissing-field-initializers]
static mach_timebase_info_data_t nn_clock_timebase_info = {0};
BUG=skia:
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/803113003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
They're annoying.
BUG=skia:
R=mtklein@google.com
Author: mtklein@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/437323002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
BUG=skia:
R=mtklein@google.com
Author: mtklein@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/439333002
|
|
This isn't something I want to make part of Skia, but just a substrate to build cross-process demos on top of. If I client were to use Skia cross-process, they'd drop their own IPC system in here.
If you're not familiar, nanomsg (nanomsg.org) is the next-gen zeromq (zeromq.org), from the same author, righting all his design wrongs from zeromq.
It's a lot like the lower half of mojo, dealing with making the connections and getting messages reliably from A to B. Think, better sockets, and it spans nicely across in-process (with zero-copy), inter-process, and TCP.
BUG=skia:
R=bsalomon@google.com, mtklein@google.com
Author: mtklein@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/294873004
|