| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
TBR=djsollen@google.com
BUG=skia:
GOLD_TRYBOT_URL= https://gold.skia.org/search?issue=2159223003
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2159223003
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This should give us a good baseline to explore using SkRasterPipeline.
A particular colorxform to half float drops from 425us to 282us on my desktop.
Color Xform to Half Float (HP z620)
Original 425us
Trans16 (not 32) 355us
Vector Trans16 378us
Trans16 + Keep Halfs in Vector 335us
Vector Trans16 + Keep Halfs in Vector 282us
Final 282us
Color Xform to Half Float (Nexus 5X)
Original 556us
Final 472us
BUG=skia:
GOLD_TRYBOT_URL= https://gold.skia.org/search?issue=2159993003
CQ_INCLUDE_TRYBOTS=master.client.skia:Test-Ubuntu-GCC-GCE-CPU-AVX2-x86_64-Release-SKNX_NO_SIMD-Trybot
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2159993003
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
BUG=skia:
GOLD_TRYBOT_URL= https://gold.skia.org/search?issue=2147763002
CQ_INCLUDE_TRYBOTS=client.skia:Test-Ubuntu-GCC-GCE-CPU-AVX2-x86_64-Release-SKNX_NO_SIMD-Trybot;master.client.skia:Test-Ubuntu-GCC-GCE-CPU-AVX2-x86_64-Release-SKNX_NO_SIMD-Trybot
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2147763002
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
201295.jpg on HP z620 (300x280)
QCMS Xform 0.418 ms
Skia NEW Xform 0.378 ms
Vs QCMS 1.11x
BUG=skia:
GOLD_TRYBOT_URL= https://gold.skia.org/search?issue=2078623002
CQ_EXTRA_TRYBOTS=client.skia:Test-Ubuntu-GCC-GCE-CPU-AVX2-x86_64-Release-SKNX_NO_SIMD-Trybot
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2078623002
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
201295.jpg on HP z620
(300x280, most common form of sRGB profile)
QCMS Xform 0.495 ms
Skia Old Xform 0.235 ms
Skia NEW Xform 0.423 ms
Vs Old Code 0.56x
Vs QCMS 1.17x
So to summarize, we are now much slower than before,
but still a bit faster than QCMS. And now we are also
far more accurate than QCMS :).
BUG=skia:
GOLD_TRYBOT_URL= https://gold.skia.org/search?issue=2060823003
CQ_EXTRA_TRYBOTS=client.skia:Test-Ubuntu-GCC-GCE-CPU-AVX2-x86_64-Release-SKNX_NO_SIMD-Trybot
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2060823003
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Because we recognize commonly used gamma tables and
parameters as 2.2f, about 98% of jpegs with color profiles
will pass through this xform (assuming the dst is also
2.2f). Sample size is 10,322 jpegs.
I won't go crazy with performance numbers because this is
a work in progress, particularly in terms of correctness.
201295.jpg on HP z620
(300x280, most common form of sRGB profile)
Decode Time + QCMS Xform 1.28 ms
QCMS Xform Only 0.495 ms
Decode Time + Skia Opt Xform 1.01 ms
Skia Opt Xform Only 0.235 ms
Decode Time + Xform Speed-up 1.27x
Xform Only Speed-up 2.11x
FWIW, Skia xform time before these optimizations was
41.1 ms. But we expected that code to be slow.
BUG=skia:
GOLD_TRYBOT_URL= https://gold.skia.org/search?issue=2046013002
CQ_EXTRA_TRYBOTS=client.skia:Test-Ubuntu-GCC-GCE-CPU-AVX2-x86_64-Release-SKNX_NO_SIMD-Trybot
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2046013002
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
BUG=skia:
GOLD_TRYBOT_URL= https://gold.skia.org/search?issue=2031053005
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2031053005
|
|
|
--colorImages is empty by default so this won't affect the runtime of
the bots. To run locally, use --colorImages <path> and
--benchType skcolorcodec.
Two takeaways so far:
Color correction is (currently) slower than jpeg decodes.
Our reference solution is slower than qcms.
TBR=reed@google.com
BUG=skia:
GOLD_TRYBOT_URL= https://gold.skia.org/search?issue=2035793002
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2035793002
|
msarett