diff options
| author |  mtklein <mtklein@chromium.org> | 2014-09-24 08:59:37 -0700 |
|---|---|---|
| committer |  Commit bot <commit-bot@chromium.org> | 2014-09-24 08:59:37 -0700 |
| commit | eee606c7bf6b343429dcdbf56b6b71bd83575060 (patch) | |
| tree | 79a2fb34f9606d9fe3b5859b5c2879bbc530da54 /src | |
| parent | 30d2cc6ff47cb7f981d83e9a536971beec920f61 (diff) | |
Swap iteration order in TileGrid::insert().
Was looking at performance here (it's the record hotspot) and noticed we
iterate through the grid out of order. This is a tiny little thing, but it's
probably orthogonal to any other performance improvements we'll make in here.
BUG=skia:
R=robertphillips@google.com, mtklein@google.com
Author: mtklein@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/598933004
Diffstat (limited to 'src')
| -rw-r--r-- | src/core/SkTileGrid.cpp | 4 |
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/src/core/SkTileGrid.cpp b/src/core/SkTileGrid.cpp index 84dc949b36..2eea6dbf36 100644 --- a/src/core/SkTileGrid.cpp +++ b/src/core/SkTileGrid.cpp @@ -52,8 +52,8 @@ void SkTileGrid::insert(void* data, const SkRect& fbounds, bool) { fYTiles - 1)); Entry entry = { fCount++, data }; - for (int x = minX; x <= maxX; x++) { - for (int y = minY; y <= maxY; y++) { + for (int y = minY; y <= maxY; y++) { + for (int x = minX; x <= maxX; x++) { fTiles[y * fXTiles + x].push(entry); } } |