From a41ea47b20b22f2de2db1b69f0e5fef2119c7060 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jonathan Reed Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 20:56:48 -0500 Subject: Wordsmith 2nd paragraph in -ism principle Suggestions from dove --- code-of-conduct.txt | 9 +++++---- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/code-of-conduct.txt b/code-of-conduct.txt index d4c7270..dc50f64 100644 --- a/code-of-conduct.txt +++ b/code-of-conduct.txt @@ -98,10 +98,11 @@ from the ones above it, because it's often not a specific, observable phenomenon ("well-actually's" are easy to spot because they almost always start with the words "well, actually..."). -Unlike the other guidelines, incidents which violate this principle -may not be a comment directed at a specific individual. In situations -like this, anyone who observes the behavior should feel empowered to -talk to the people involved or bring it to the attention of the EC. +Unlike many of the situations described in our other guidelines, these +sorts of incidents may not take the form of a comment directed at a +specific individual. In situations like this, anyone who observes the +behavior should feel empowered to talk to the people involved or bring +it to the attention of the EC. If someone says a comment you made was sexist, racist, or otherwise discriminatory, please do not enter into a protracted debate about it, -- cgit v1.2.3