diff options
author | Jonathan Reed <jdreed@mit.edu> | 2014-02-25 20:56:48 -0500 |
---|---|---|
committer | Jonathan Reed <jdreed@mit.edu> | 2014-02-25 20:56:48 -0500 |
commit | a41ea47b20b22f2de2db1b69f0e5fef2119c7060 (patch) | |
tree | eb0ad2e347783f36b9e33b70f064eb901cf059a1 | |
parent | 14ae042e331680add88acb732c5d604ce54f5f47 (diff) |
Wordsmith 2nd paragraph in -ism principle
Suggestions from dove
-rw-r--r-- | code-of-conduct.txt | 9 |
1 files changed, 5 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/code-of-conduct.txt b/code-of-conduct.txt index d4c7270..dc50f64 100644 --- a/code-of-conduct.txt +++ b/code-of-conduct.txt @@ -98,10 +98,11 @@ from the ones above it, because it's often not a specific, observable phenomenon ("well-actually's" are easy to spot because they almost always start with the words "well, actually..."). -Unlike the other guidelines, incidents which violate this principle -may not be a comment directed at a specific individual. In situations -like this, anyone who observes the behavior should feel empowered to -talk to the people involved or bring it to the attention of the EC. +Unlike many of the situations described in our other guidelines, these +sorts of incidents may not take the form of a comment directed at a +specific individual. In situations like this, anyone who observes the +behavior should feel empowered to talk to the people involved or bring +it to the attention of the EC. If someone says a comment you made was sexist, racist, or otherwise discriminatory, please do not enter into a protracted debate about it, |