syntax = "proto3"; // These proto descriptors have at one time been reported as an issue or defect. // They are kept here to replicate the issue, and continue to verify the fix. // Issue: Non-"Google.Protobuffers" namespace will ensure that protobuffer library types are qualified option csharp_namespace = "UnitTest.Issues.TestProtos"; package unittest_issues; option optimize_for = SPEED; // Issue 307: when generating doubly-nested types, any references // should be of the form A.Types.B.Types.C. message Issue307 { message NestedOnce { message NestedTwice { } } } // Old issue 13: http://code.google.com/p/protobuf-csharp-port/issues/detail?id=13 // New issue 309: https://github.com/google/protobuf/issues/309 // message A { // optional int32 _A = 1; // } // message B { // optional int32 B_ = 1; // } //message AB { // optional int32 a_b = 1; //} // Similar issue with numeric names // Java code failed too, so probably best for this to be a restriction. // See https://github.com/google/protobuf/issues/308 // message NumberField { // optional int32 _01 = 1; // } // issue 19 - negative enum values enum NegativeEnum { NEGATIVE_ENUM_ZERO = 0; FiveBelow = -5; MinusOne = -1; } message NegativeEnumMessage { NegativeEnum value = 1; repeated NegativeEnum values = 2 [packed = false]; repeated NegativeEnum packed_values = 3 [packed=true]; } // Issue 21: http://code.google.com/p/protobuf-csharp-port/issues/detail?id=21 // Decorate fields with [deprecated=true] as [System.Obsolete] message DeprecatedChild { } enum DeprecatedEnum { DEPRECATED_ZERO = 0; one = 1; } message DeprecatedFieldsMessage { int32 PrimitiveValue = 1 [deprecated = true]; repeated int32 PrimitiveArray = 2 [deprecated = true]; DeprecatedChild MessageValue = 3 [deprecated = true]; repeated DeprecatedChild MessageArray = 4 [deprecated = true]; DeprecatedEnum EnumValue = 5 [deprecated = true]; repeated DeprecatedEnum EnumArray = 6 [deprecated = true]; } // Issue 45: http://code.google.com/p/protobuf-csharp-port/issues/detail?id=45 message ItemField { int32 item = 1; } message ReservedNames { // Force a nested type called Types message SomeNestedType { } int32 types = 1; int32 descriptor = 2; } message TestJsonFieldOrdering { // These fields are deliberately not declared in numeric // order, and the oneof fields aren't contiguous either. // This allows for reasonably robust tests of JSON output // ordering. // TestFieldOrderings in unittest_proto3.proto is similar, // but doesn't include oneofs. // TODO: Consider adding oneofs to TestFieldOrderings, although // that will require fixing other tests in multiple platforms. // Alternatively, consider just adding this to // unittest_proto3.proto if multiple platforms want it. int32 plain_int32 = 4; oneof o1 { string o1_string = 2; int32 o1_int32 = 5; } string plain_string = 1; oneof o2 { int32 o2_int32 = 6; string o2_string = 3; } } message TestJsonName { // Message for testing the effects for of the json_name option string name = 1; string description = 2 [json_name = "desc"]; string guid = 3 [json_name = "exid"]; } // Issue 3200: When merging two messages which use the same // oneof case, which is itself a message type, the submessages should // be merged. message OneofMerging { message Nested { int32 x = 1; int32 y = 2; } oneof value { string text = 1; Nested nested = 2; } }