aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffhomepage
path: root/csharp/src/Google.Protobuf/WellKnownTypes
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAge
* Generated code from previous commit.Gravatar Jon Skeet2015-10-01
|
* Fix typo in oneof case enum commentGravatar Jon Skeet2015-09-30
|
* Generated code changes for previous commit.Gravatar Jon Skeet2015-09-29
|
* Generated code for previous commitGravatar Jon Skeet2015-09-29
|
* Merge pull request #785 from jskeet/csharp-directoriesGravatar Jan Tattermusch2015-09-23
|\ | | | | Generate C# directory hierarchy with new option
* | Pack/Unpack implementation for Any.Gravatar Jon Skeet2015-09-04
| | | | | | | | | | We still need the JSON representation, which relies on something like a DescriptorPool to fetch message types from based on the type URL. That will come a bit later. (The DescriptorPool comment in this commit is just a note which will prove useful if we use DescriptorPool itself.)
| * Regenerated code. Most changes are whitespace, removing trailing spaces.Gravatar Jon Skeet2015-09-01
|/ | | | Other changes are due to the well-known types changing without us regenerating.
* Generated code for previous commit.Gravatar Jon Skeet2015-08-06
|
* Generated code changes for previous commit.Gravatar Jon Skeet2015-08-05
|
* Generated code changes for previous commit.Gravatar Jon Skeet2015-08-05
|
* Document everything, and turn on errors if we fail to document anything in ↵Gravatar Jon Skeet2015-08-04
| | | | the future.
* Format JSON for Duration and Timestamp.Gravatar Jon Skeet2015-08-03
| | | | This is taking an approach of putting all the logic in JsonFormatter. That's helpful in terms of concealing the details of whether or not to wrap the value in quotes, but it does lack flexibility. I don't *think* we want to allow user-defined formatting of messages, so that much shouldn't be a problem.
* Well-known type operations for Timestamp and Duration (but not JSON formatting).Gravatar Jon Skeet2015-07-31
| | | | | While I've provided operators, I haven't yet provided the method equivalents. It's not clear to me that they're actually a good idea, while we're really targeting C# developers who definitely *can* use the user-defined operators.
* Generated code for previous commit.Gravatar Jon Skeet2015-07-30
|
* Generated code from previous commit.Gravatar Jon Skeet2015-07-30
|
* regenerate codeGravatar Jan Tattermusch2015-07-29
|
* Fix attribute mistake and regenerate code.Gravatar Jon Skeet2015-07-22
|
* Generated code for previous commit.Gravatar Jon Skeet2015-07-22
|
* Generated code changes following previous commit.Gravatar Jon Skeet2015-07-21
|
* First pass at the big rename from ProtocolBuffers to Google.Protobuf.Gravatar Jon Skeet2015-07-17
We'll see what I've missed when CI fails...