| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age |
|---|
| |
|
|
| |
Visual Studio, changed dotnet command in buildall to dotnet test, and deleted Program.cs (because it's no longer required).
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This has one important packaging change: the netstandard version now
depends (implicitly) on netstandard1.6.1 rather than on individual
packages. This is the preferred style of dependency, and shouldn't
affect any users - see http://stackoverflow.com/questions/42946951
for details.
The tests are still NUnit, but NUnit doesn't support "dotnet test"
yet; the test project is now an executable using NUnitLite. (When
NUnit supports dotnet test, we can adapt to it.)
Note that the project will now only work in Visual Studio 2017 (and
Visual Studio Code, and from the command line with the .NET Core
1.0.0 SDK); Visual Studio 2015 does *not* support this project file
format.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
platform (#1727)
Move to dotnet cli for building, and .NET Core (netstandard1.0) as target platform
This also updates the version number to 3.0.0-beta4
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The usage of ICustomDiagnosticMessage here is non-essential - ToDiagnosticString
doesn't actually get called by ToString() in this case, due to JsonFormatter code. It was
intended to make it clearer that it *did* have a custom format... but then arguably I should
do the same for Value, Struct, Any etc.
Moving some of the code out of JsonFormatter and into Duration/Timestamp/FieldMask likewise
feels somewhat nice, somewhat nasty... basically there are JSON-specific bits of formatting, but
also domain-specific bits of computation. <sigh>
Thoughts welcome.
|
| |
|
|
| |
This fixes issue #933, effectively.
|
| |
|
|
| |
Biting off just this bit first as I don't need the changes from a previous PR for this part.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This includes all the well-known types except Any.
Some aspects are likely to require further work when the details of the JSON parsing expectations are hammered out in more detail. Some of these have "ignored" tests already.
Note that the choice *not* to use Json.NET was made for two reasons:
- Going from 0 dependencies to 1 dependency is a big hit, and there's not much benefit here
- Json.NET parses more leniently than we'd want; accommodating that would be nearly as much work as writing the tokenizer
This only really affects the JsonTokenizer, which could be replaced by Json.NET. The JsonParser code would be about the same length with Json.NET... but I wouldn't be as confident in it.
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
We still need the JSON representation, which relies on something like a DescriptorPool to fetch message types from based on the type URL. That will come a bit later.
(The DescriptorPool comment in this commit is just a note which will prove useful if we use DescriptorPool itself.)
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
While I've provided operators, I haven't yet provided the method equivalents. It's not clear to me that
they're actually a good idea, while we're really targeting C# developers who definitely *can* use the user-defined operators.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
| |
This is definitely not ready to ship - I'm "troubled" by the disconnect between a list of fields in declaration order, and a mapping of field accessors by field number/name. Discussion required, but I find that easier when we've got code to look at :)
|
|
|
We'll see what I've missed when CI fails...
|
ObsidianMinor
Jon Skeet
Jon Skeet
Jan Tattermusch