1 files changed, 19 insertions, 12 deletions

diff --git a/src/google/protobuf/compiler/java/java_context.cc b/src/google/protobuf/compiler/java/java_context.cc
index 7d21fe61..2528c2d1 100644
--- a/src/google/protobuf/compiler/java/java_context.cc
+++ b/src/google/protobuf/compiler/java/java_context.cc
@@ -42,15 +42,15 @@ namespace protobuf {
 namespace compiler {
 namespace java {
 
-Context::Context(const FileDescriptor* file)
-    : name_resolver_(new ClassNameResolver) {
+Context::Context(const FileDescriptor* file, const Options& options)
+    : name_resolver_(new ClassNameResolver), options_(options) {
   InitializeFieldGeneratorInfo(file);
 }
 
 Context::~Context() {
 }
 
-ClassNameResolver* Context::GetNameResolver() {
+ClassNameResolver* Context::GetNameResolver() const {
   return name_resolver_.get();
 }
 
@@ -69,14 +69,14 @@ bool IsConflicting(const FieldDescriptor* field1, const string& name1,
       // field1 is repeated, and field2 is not.
       if (name1 + "Count" == name2) {
         *info = "both repeated field \"" + field1->name() + "\" and singular " +
-            "field \"" + field2->name() + "\" generates the method \"" +
-            "get" + name1 + "Count()\"";
+                "field \"" + field2->name() + "\" generate the method \"" +
+                "get" + name1 + "Count()\"";
         return true;
       }
       if (name1 + "List" == name2) {
         *info = "both repeated field \"" + field1->name() + "\" and singular " +
-            "field \"" + field2->name() + "\" generates the method \"" +
-            "get" + name1 + "List()\"";
+                "field \"" + field2->name() + "\" generate the method \"" +
+                "get" + name1 + "List()\"";
         return true;
       }
       // Well, there are obviously many more conflicting cases, but it probably
@@ -108,7 +108,7 @@ void Context::InitializeFieldGeneratorInfoForMessage(
   for (int i = 0; i < message->nested_type_count(); ++i) {
     InitializeFieldGeneratorInfoForMessage(message->nested_type(i));
   }
-  vector<const FieldDescriptor*> fields;
+  std::vector<const FieldDescriptor*> fields;
   for (int i = 0; i < message->field_count(); ++i) {
     fields.push_back(message->field(i));
   }
@@ -124,11 +124,11 @@ void Context::InitializeFieldGeneratorInfoForMessage(
 }
 
 void Context::InitializeFieldGeneratorInfoForFields(
-    const vector<const FieldDescriptor*>& fields) {
+    const std::vector<const FieldDescriptor*>& fields) {
   // Find out all fields that conflict with some other field in the same
   // message.
-  vector<bool> is_conflict(fields.size());
-  vector<string> conflict_reason(fields.size());
+  std::vector<bool> is_conflict(fields.size());
+  std::vector<string> conflict_reason(fields.size());
   for (int i = 0; i < fields.size(); ++i) {
     const FieldDescriptor* field = fields[i];
     const string& name = UnderscoresToCapitalizedCamelCase(field);
@@ -154,7 +154,7 @@ void Context::InitializeFieldGeneratorInfoForFields(
   for (int i = 0; i < fields.size(); ++i) {
     const FieldDescriptor* field = fields[i];
     FieldGeneratorInfo info;
-    info.name = UnderscoresToCamelCase(field);
+    info.name = CamelCaseFieldName(field);
     info.capitalized_name = UnderscoresToCapitalizedCamelCase(field);
     // For fields conflicting with some other fields, we append the field
     // number to their field names in generated code to avoid conflicts.
@@ -189,6 +189,13 @@ const OneofGeneratorInfo* Context::GetOneofGeneratorInfo(
   return result;
 }
 
+// Does this message class have generated parsing, serialization, and other
+// standard methods for which reflection-based fallback implementations exist?
+bool Context::HasGeneratedMethods(const Descriptor* descriptor) const {
+  return options_.enforce_lite ||
+         descriptor->file()->options().optimize_for() != FileOptions::CODE_SIZE;
+}
+
 }  // namespace java
 }  // namespace compiler
 }  // namespace protobuf