diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'csharp/protos')
| -rw-r--r-- | csharp/protos/unittest_custom_options_proto3.proto | 338 |
1 files changed, 338 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/csharp/protos/unittest_custom_options_proto3.proto b/csharp/protos/unittest_custom_options_proto3.proto new file mode 100644 index 00000000..9b18b280 --- /dev/null +++ b/csharp/protos/unittest_custom_options_proto3.proto @@ -0,0 +1,338 @@ +// Protocol Buffers - Google's data interchange format +// Copyright 2008 Google Inc. All rights reserved. +// https://developers.google.com/protocol-buffers/ +// +// Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without +// modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are +// met: +// +// * Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright +// notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer. +// * Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above +// copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer +// in the documentation and/or other materials provided with the +// distribution. +// * Neither the name of Google Inc. nor the names of its +// contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived from +// this software without specific prior written permission. +// +// THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS +// "AS IS" AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT +// LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR +// A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT +// OWNER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, +// SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT +// LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, +// DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY +// THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT +// (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE +// OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE. + +// Author: benjy@google.com (Benjy Weinberger) +// Based on original Protocol Buffers design by +// Sanjay Ghemawat, Jeff Dean, and others. +// +// A proto file used to test the "custom options" feature of google.protobuf. + +// This file is based on unittest_custom_options.proto in +// src/google/protobuf, but is modified for proto3. It could +// potentially be moved into src/google/protobuf, but currently C# +// is the only language that really needs it, as we don't support +// proto2 syntax. It's cut down significantly as proto3 only supports +// extensions for options. + + +syntax = "proto3"; + +// A custom file option (defined below). +option (file_opt1) = 9876543210; + +import "google/protobuf/descriptor.proto"; + +// We don't put this in a package within proto2 because we need to make sure +// that the generated code doesn't depend on being in the proto2 namespace. +package protobuf_unittest; +option csharp_namespace = "UnitTest.Issues.TestProtos"; + +// Some simple test custom options of various types. + +extend google.protobuf.FileOptions { + uint64 file_opt1 = 7736974; +} + +extend google.protobuf.MessageOptions { + int32 message_opt1 = 7739036; +} + +extend google.protobuf.FieldOptions { + fixed64 field_opt1 = 7740936; +} + +// See https://github.com/google/protobuf/issues/2316 +// extend google.protobuf.OneofOptions { +// int32 oneof_opt1 = 7740111; +// } + +extend google.protobuf.EnumOptions { + sfixed32 enum_opt1 = 7753576; +} + +extend google.protobuf.EnumValueOptions { + int32 enum_value_opt1 = 1560678; +} + +extend google.protobuf.ServiceOptions { + sint64 service_opt1 = 7887650; +} + +enum MethodOpt1 { + METHODOPT1_UNSPECIFIED = 0; + METHODOPT1_VAL1 = 1; + METHODOPT1_VAL2 = 2; +} + +extend google.protobuf.MethodOptions { + MethodOpt1 method_opt1 = 7890860; +} + +// A test message with custom options at all possible locations (and also some +// regular options, to make sure they interact nicely). +message TestMessageWithCustomOptions { + option message_set_wire_format = false; + + option (message_opt1) = -56; + + string field1 = 1 [ctype=CORD, + (field_opt1)=8765432109]; + + oneof AnOneof { +// See https://github.com/google/protobuf/issues/2316 +// option (oneof_opt1) = -99; + int32 oneof_field = 2; + } + + enum AnEnum { + option (enum_opt1) = -789; + ANENUM_UNSPECIFIED = 0; + ANENUM_VAL1 = 1; + ANENUM_VAL2 = 2 [(enum_value_opt1) = 123]; + } +} + + +// A test RPC service with custom options at all possible locations (and also +// some regular options, to make sure they interact nicely). +message CustomOptionFooRequest { +} + +message CustomOptionFooResponse { +} + +message CustomOptionFooClientMessage { +} + +message CustomOptionFooServerMessage { +} + +service TestServiceWithCustomOptions { + option (service_opt1) = -9876543210; + + rpc Foo(CustomOptionFooRequest) returns (CustomOptionFooResponse) { + option (method_opt1) = METHODOPT1_VAL2; + } +} + + + +// Options of every possible field type, so we can test them all exhaustively. + +message DummyMessageContainingEnum { + enum TestEnumType { + TEST_OPTION_ENUM_UNSPECIFIED = 0; + TEST_OPTION_ENUM_TYPE1 = 22; + TEST_OPTION_ENUM_TYPE2 = -23; + } +} + +message DummyMessageInvalidAsOptionType { +} + +extend google.protobuf.MessageOptions { + bool bool_opt = 7706090; + int32 int32_opt = 7705709; + int64 int64_opt = 7705542; + uint32 uint32_opt = 7704880; + uint64 uint64_opt = 7702367; + sint32 sint32_opt = 7701568; + sint64 sint64_opt = 7700863; + fixed32 fixed32_opt = 7700307; + fixed64 fixed64_opt = 7700194; + sfixed32 sfixed32_opt = 7698645; + sfixed64 sfixed64_opt = 7685475; + float float_opt = 7675390; + double double_opt = 7673293; + string string_opt = 7673285; + bytes bytes_opt = 7673238; + DummyMessageContainingEnum.TestEnumType enum_opt = 7673233; + DummyMessageInvalidAsOptionType message_type_opt = 7665967; +} + +message CustomOptionMinIntegerValues { + option (bool_opt) = false; + option (int32_opt) = -0x80000000; + option (int64_opt) = -0x8000000000000000; + option (uint32_opt) = 0; + option (uint64_opt) = 0; + option (sint32_opt) = -0x80000000; + option (sint64_opt) = -0x8000000000000000; + option (fixed32_opt) = 0; + option (fixed64_opt) = 0; + option (sfixed32_opt) = -0x80000000; + option (sfixed64_opt) = -0x8000000000000000; +} + +message CustomOptionMaxIntegerValues { + option (bool_opt) = true; + option (int32_opt) = 0x7FFFFFFF; + option (int64_opt) = 0x7FFFFFFFFFFFFFFF; + option (uint32_opt) = 0xFFFFFFFF; + option (uint64_opt) = 0xFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF; + option (sint32_opt) = 0x7FFFFFFF; + option (sint64_opt) = 0x7FFFFFFFFFFFFFFF; + option (fixed32_opt) = 0xFFFFFFFF; + option (fixed64_opt) = 0xFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF; + option (sfixed32_opt) = 0x7FFFFFFF; + option (sfixed64_opt) = 0x7FFFFFFFFFFFFFFF; +} + +message CustomOptionOtherValues { + option (int32_opt) = -100; // To test sign-extension. + option (float_opt) = 12.3456789; + option (double_opt) = 1.234567890123456789; + option (string_opt) = "Hello, \"World\""; + option (bytes_opt) = "Hello\0World"; + option (enum_opt) = TEST_OPTION_ENUM_TYPE2; +} + +message SettingRealsFromPositiveInts { + option (float_opt) = 12; + option (double_opt) = 154; +} + +message SettingRealsFromNegativeInts { + option (float_opt) = -12; + option (double_opt) = -154; +} + +// Options of complex message types, themselves combined and extended in +// various ways. + +message ComplexOptionType1 { + int32 foo = 1; + int32 foo2 = 2; + int32 foo3 = 3; + repeated int32 foo4 = 4; +} + +message ComplexOptionType2 { + ComplexOptionType1 bar = 1; + int32 baz = 2; + + message ComplexOptionType4 { + int32 waldo = 1; + + extend google.protobuf.MessageOptions { + ComplexOptionType4 complex_opt4 = 7633546; + } + } + + ComplexOptionType4 fred = 3; + repeated ComplexOptionType4 barney = 4; +} + +message ComplexOptionType3 { + int32 qux = 1; +} + +extend google.protobuf.MessageOptions { + protobuf_unittest.ComplexOptionType1 complex_opt1 = 7646756; + ComplexOptionType2 complex_opt2 = 7636949; + ComplexOptionType3 complex_opt3 = 7636463; +} + +// Note that we try various different ways of naming the same extension. +message VariousComplexOptions { + option (.protobuf_unittest.complex_opt1).foo = 42; + option (protobuf_unittest.complex_opt1).foo4 = 99; + option (protobuf_unittest.complex_opt1).foo4 = 88; + option (complex_opt2).baz = 987; + option (complex_opt2).bar.foo = 743; + option (ComplexOptionType2.ComplexOptionType4.complex_opt4).waldo = 1971; + option (complex_opt2).fred.waldo = 321; + option (complex_opt2).barney = { waldo: 101 }; + option (complex_opt2).barney = { waldo: 212 }; + option (protobuf_unittest.complex_opt3).qux = 9; +} + +// ------------------------------------------------------ +// Definitions for testing aggregate option parsing. +// See descriptor_unittest.cc. + +// A helper type used to test aggregate option parsing +message Aggregate { + int32 i = 1; + string s = 2; + + // A nested object + Aggregate sub = 3; +} + +// Allow Aggregate to be used as an option at all possible locations +// in the .proto grammer. +extend google.protobuf.FileOptions { Aggregate fileopt = 15478479; } +extend google.protobuf.MessageOptions { Aggregate msgopt = 15480088; } +extend google.protobuf.FieldOptions { Aggregate fieldopt = 15481374; } +extend google.protobuf.EnumOptions { Aggregate enumopt = 15483218; } +extend google.protobuf.EnumValueOptions { Aggregate enumvalopt = 15486921; } +extend google.protobuf.ServiceOptions { Aggregate serviceopt = 15497145; } +extend google.protobuf.MethodOptions { Aggregate methodopt = 15512713; } + +// Try using AggregateOption at different points in the proto grammar +option (fileopt) = { + s: 'FileAnnotation' + // Also test the handling of comments + /* of both types */ i: 100 + + sub { s: 'NestedFileAnnotation' } +}; + +message AggregateMessage { + option (msgopt) = { i:101 s:'MessageAnnotation' }; + int32 fieldname = 1 [(fieldopt) = { s:'FieldAnnotation' }]; +} + +service AggregateService { + option (serviceopt) = { s:'ServiceAnnotation' }; + rpc Method (AggregateMessage) returns (AggregateMessage) { + option (methodopt) = { s:'MethodAnnotation' }; + } +} + +enum AggregateEnum { + option (enumopt) = { s:'EnumAnnotation' }; + UNSPECIFIED = 0; + VALUE = 1 [(enumvalopt) = { s:'EnumValueAnnotation' }]; +} + +// Test custom options for nested type. +message NestedOptionType { + message NestedMessage { + option (message_opt1) = 1001; + int32 nested_field = 1 [(field_opt1) = 1002]; + } + enum NestedEnum { + UNSPECIFIED = 0; + option (enum_opt1) = 1003; + NESTED_ENUM_VALUE = 1 [(enum_value_opt1) = 1004]; + } +} |