diff options
| -rw-r--r-- | csharp/src/Google.Protobuf.Test/GeneratedMessageTest.cs | 22 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | csharp/src/Google.Protobuf/CodedInputStream.cs | 4 |
2 files changed, 24 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/csharp/src/Google.Protobuf.Test/GeneratedMessageTest.cs b/csharp/src/Google.Protobuf.Test/GeneratedMessageTest.cs index 6fdd1066..575d4586 100644 --- a/csharp/src/Google.Protobuf.Test/GeneratedMessageTest.cs +++ b/csharp/src/Google.Protobuf.Test/GeneratedMessageTest.cs @@ -629,5 +629,27 @@ namespace Google.Protobuf var data = new byte[] { 130, 3, 1 };
Assert.Throws<InvalidProtocolBufferException>(() => TestAllTypes.Parser.ParseFrom(data));
}
+
+ /// <summary>
+ /// Demonstrates current behaviour with an extraneous end group tag - see issue 688
+ /// for details; we may want to change this.
+ /// </summary>
+ [Test]
+ public void ExtraEndGroupSkipped()
+ {
+ var message = SampleMessages.CreateFullTestAllTypes();
+ var stream = new MemoryStream();
+ var output = new CodedOutputStream(stream);
+
+ output.WriteTag(100, WireFormat.WireType.EndGroup);
+ output.WriteTag(TestAllTypes.SingleFixed32FieldNumber, WireFormat.WireType.Fixed32);
+ output.WriteFixed32(123);
+
+ output.Flush();
+
+ stream.Position = 0;
+ var parsed = TestAllTypes.Parser.ParseFrom(stream);
+ Assert.AreEqual(new TestAllTypes { SingleFixed32 = 123 }, parsed);
+ }
}
}
diff --git a/csharp/src/Google.Protobuf/CodedInputStream.cs b/csharp/src/Google.Protobuf/CodedInputStream.cs index a37fefc1..dcd19e48 100644 --- a/csharp/src/Google.Protobuf/CodedInputStream.cs +++ b/csharp/src/Google.Protobuf/CodedInputStream.cs @@ -346,7 +346,7 @@ namespace Google.Protobuf switch (WireFormat.GetTagWireType(lastTag))
{
case WireFormat.WireType.StartGroup:
- ConsumeGroup();
+ SkipGroup();
break;
case WireFormat.WireType.EndGroup:
// Just ignore; there's no data following the tag.
@@ -367,7 +367,7 @@ namespace Google.Protobuf }
}
- private void ConsumeGroup()
+ private void SkipGroup()
{
// Note: Currently we expect this to be the way that groups are read. We could put the recursion
// depth changes into the ReadTag method instead, potentially...
|