From 37dec7d7b37afd281f23c0ec7ed9111c24965126 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tomi Ollila Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2012 16:44:28 +0200 Subject: emacs/*.el: changed one-char comment prefix ';' to two; ';;' In order for emacs (indent-region) to (re)indent emacs lisp properly there needs to be at least 2 comment characters (;;). --- emacs/notmuch-lib.el | 16 ++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) (limited to 'emacs/notmuch-lib.el') diff --git a/emacs/notmuch-lib.el b/emacs/notmuch-lib.el index e33e69a4..241fe8c4 100644 --- a/emacs/notmuch-lib.el +++ b/emacs/notmuch-lib.el @@ -148,14 +148,14 @@ the user hasn't set this variable with the old or new value." (setq list (cdr list))) (nreverse out))) -; This lets us avoid compiling these replacement functions when emacs -; is sufficiently new enough to supply them alone. We do the macro -; treatment rather than just wrapping our defun calls in a when form -; specifically so that the compiler never sees the code on new emacs, -; (since the code is triggering warnings that we don't know how to get -; rid of. -; -; A more clever macro here would accept a condition and a list of forms. +;; This lets us avoid compiling these replacement functions when emacs +;; is sufficiently new enough to supply them alone. We do the macro +;; treatment rather than just wrapping our defun calls in a when form +;; specifically so that the compiler never sees the code on new emacs, +;; (since the code is triggering warnings that we don't know how to get +;; rid of. +;; +;; A more clever macro here would accept a condition and a list of forms. (defmacro compile-on-emacs-prior-to-23 (form) "Conditionally evaluate form only on emacs < emacs-23." (list 'when (< emacs-major-version 23) -- cgit v1.2.3