| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The sequential identifiers have the advantage of being guaranteed to
be unique (until we overflow a 64-bit unsigned integer), and also take
up half as much space in the "notmuch search" output (16 columns
rather than 32).
This change also has the side effect of fixing a bug where notmuch
could block on /dev/random at startup (waiting for some entropy to
appear). This bug was hit hard by the test suite, (which could easily
exhaust the available entropy on common systems---resulting in large
delays of the test suite).
|
| |
|
|
| |
Our test-suite coverage keeps improving, (slowly).
|
| |
|
|
| |
Clean output is just so much easier to read (and validate).
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
As recently promised, no new features are being accepted to notmuch
without corresponding new tests for the test suite.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
These tests were surprisingly simple to write---not much code at all
and most of them worked the first time even with hand-prepared
versions of the expected output.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The previous generate_message function is what's needed when testing
"notmuch new". But after that, we never want to generate a message
without also adding it to the index. So create a new add_message
function with this convenience.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is a test for the recently added feature where we detect that the
reply-to address already exists in the To: or Cc: header so will
already be replied to. In this case we want to include the From:
address in our reply, (where, otherwise we would use the Reply-To
address *instead* of the address in the From header).
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
The feature tested here is that we reply to both the sender and to
others addresses on the To: line of the original message, but that we
don't reply to our own address.
|
| |
|
|
| |
A simple test to help round out the set of tested features.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is the standard support of reply-to, (replying to that address
rather than the from address). It has nothing to do with the proposed
feature for extra-clever handling of a mail from a mailing-list that
has munged the reply-to header.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
When reply to a message addresses to an address configured in the
other_email setting in the configuration file, the reply should use
that address in the From header. Test this.
|
| |
|
|
| |
Simply ensuring that the reply template is formatted as expected.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We were sleeping merely to ensure that our updates to the mail store
would result in the mtime of the appropriate directories being
updated. We make the test suite run faster by not sleeping, but
instead explicitly updating the mtime of the directory to a future
time with touch.
We're careful to ensure that the time is not merely in the future
compared to the current time, but also later than any previous update
to the same directory mtime.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
This provides the control that future tests will need, (for example,
adding a CC field to ensure proper handling with "notmuch reply",
etc.)
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This makes the test suite bash-specific, but that's not much of
an issue for me, (if somebody else would prefer some other language
then they can rewrite the test suite and maintain it).
The advantage here is that we'll now be able to easily generate
custom messages for testing operations that depend on the message
content, (such as "notmuch reply", etc.).
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
We verify that each command creates output exactly as expected (after
ignoring variable output such as the report of how long an operation
took).
|
|
|
This notmuch-test script simply runs a few different notmuch operations,
(things that I found were useful while testing the rename-support code).
It's not useful as a test suite yet, since it doesn't actually check
the results of any operation, (the user of the suite has to know what
the results should be and must manually verify them. So there's no
integration with the build system yet, (no "make test" target).
But I didn't want to lose what I had so far, so here it is.
|
Carl Worth