aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffhomepage
path: root/lib
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorGravatar Dirk Hohndel <hohndel@infradead.org>2010-04-24 11:20:54 -0700
committerGravatar Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org>2010-04-26 11:45:00 -0700
commit26d8d960ee91b55e8e4c446e08e3fc371a0acd4a (patch)
treeec54d455a73ce31be3ee151a106bb902596e5dbf /lib
parent57561414d76297c16b4b6f3da570f14b4ddf020c (diff)
Reorder displayed names of thread authors
When displaying threads as result of a search it makes sense to list those authors first who match the search. The matching authors are separated from the non-matching ones with a '|' instead of a ',' Imagine the default "+inbox" query. Those mails in the thread that match the query are actually "new" (whatever that means). And some people seem to think that it would be much better to see those author names first. For example, imagine a long and drawn out thread that once was started by me; you have long read the older part of the thread and removed the inbox tag. Whenever a new email comes in on this thread, prior to this patch the author column in the search display will first show "Dirk Hohndel" - I think it should first show the actual author(s) of the new mail(s). Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <hohndel@infradead.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'lib')
-rw-r--r--lib/thread.cc77
1 files changed, 77 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/lib/thread.cc b/lib/thread.cc
index e1da060e..c80bb26a 100644
--- a/lib/thread.cc
+++ b/lib/thread.cc
@@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ struct _notmuch_thread {
char *subject;
GHashTable *authors_hash;
char *authors;
+ char *nonmatched_authors;
GHashTable *tags;
notmuch_message_list_t *message_list;
@@ -73,6 +74,79 @@ _thread_add_author (notmuch_thread_t *thread,
thread->authors = talloc_strdup (thread, author);
}
+/*
+ * move authors of matched messages in the thread to
+ * the front of the authors list, but keep them in
+ * existing order within their group
+ */
+static void
+_thread_move_matched_author (notmuch_thread_t *thread,
+ const char *author)
+{
+ char *authors_copy;
+ char *current_author;
+ char *last_pipe,*next_pipe;
+ int idx,nm_start,author_len,authors_len;
+
+ if (thread->authors == NULL || author == NULL)
+ return;
+ if (thread->nonmatched_authors == NULL)
+ thread->nonmatched_authors = thread->authors;
+ author_len = strlen(author);
+ authors_len = strlen(thread->authors);
+ if (author_len == authors_len) {
+ /* just one author */
+ thread->nonmatched_authors += author_len;
+ return;
+ }
+ current_author = strcasestr(thread->authors, author);
+ if (current_author == NULL)
+ return;
+ /* how far inside the nonmatched authors is our author? */
+ idx = current_author - thread->nonmatched_authors;
+ if (idx < 0) {
+ /* already among matched authors */
+ return;
+ }
+ /* are there any authors in the list after our author? */
+ if (thread->nonmatched_authors + author_len < thread->authors + authors_len) {
+ /* we have to make changes, so let's get a temp copy */
+ authors_copy = talloc_strdup(thread,thread->authors);
+ /* nm_start is the offset into where the non-matched authors start */
+ nm_start = thread->nonmatched_authors - thread->authors;
+ /* copy this author and add the "| " - the if clause above tells us there's more */
+ strncpy(thread->nonmatched_authors,author,author_len);
+ strncpy(thread->nonmatched_authors+author_len,"| ",2);
+ thread->nonmatched_authors += author_len+2;
+ if (idx > 0) {
+ /* we are actually moving authors around, not just changing the separator
+ * first copy the authors that came BEFORE our author */
+ strncpy(thread->nonmatched_authors, authors_copy+nm_start, idx-2);
+ /* finally, if there are authors AFTER our author, copy those */
+ if(author_len+nm_start+idx < authors_len) {
+ strncpy(thread->nonmatched_authors + idx - 2,", ",2);
+ strncpy(thread->nonmatched_authors + idx, authors_copy+nm_start + idx + author_len + 2,
+ authors_len - (nm_start + idx + author_len + 2));
+ }
+ }
+ /* finally let's make sure there's just one '|' in the authors string */
+ last_pipe = strchr(thread->authors,'|');
+ while (last_pipe) {
+ next_pipe = strchr(last_pipe+1,'|');
+ if (next_pipe)
+ *last_pipe = ',';
+ last_pipe = next_pipe;
+ }
+ } else {
+ thread->nonmatched_authors += author_len;
+ /* so now all authors are matched - let's remove the '|' */
+ last_pipe = strchr(thread->authors,'|');
+ if (last_pipe)
+ *last_pipe = ',';
+ }
+ return;
+}
+
/* Add 'message' as a message that belongs to 'thread'.
*
* The 'thread' will talloc_steal the 'message' and hold onto a
@@ -110,6 +184,7 @@ _thread_add_message (notmuch_thread_t *thread,
author = internet_address_mailbox_get_addr (mailbox);
}
_thread_add_author (thread, author);
+ notmuch_message_set_author (message, author);
}
g_object_unref (G_OBJECT (list));
}
@@ -182,6 +257,7 @@ _thread_add_matched_message (notmuch_thread_t *thread,
notmuch_message_set_flag (hashed_message,
NOTMUCH_MESSAGE_FLAG_MATCH, 1);
}
+ _thread_move_matched_author (thread,notmuch_message_get_author(hashed_message));
if ((sort == NOTMUCH_SORT_OLDEST_FIRST && date <= thread->newest) ||
(sort != NOTMUCH_SORT_OLDEST_FIRST && date == thread->newest))
@@ -309,6 +385,7 @@ _notmuch_thread_create (void *ctx,
thread->authors_hash = g_hash_table_new_full (g_str_hash, g_str_equal,
free, NULL);
thread->authors = NULL;
+ thread->nonmatched_authors = NULL;
thread->tags = g_hash_table_new_full (g_str_hash, g_str_equal,
free, NULL);