From 5a5edc3353f468600933112422f080004189a665 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nikolaus Rath Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2017 13:22:12 +0200 Subject: fuse_new_30(): call fuse_new_31(), not fuse_new() I believe this function call is resolved by the compiler, not the linker, so this seems safer. Thanks to Chris Clayton for spotting this. --- lib/fuse.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/lib/fuse.c b/lib/fuse.c index 5160eb1..08dab22 100644 --- a/lib/fuse.c +++ b/lib/fuse.c @@ -4647,7 +4647,7 @@ struct fuse *fuse_new_30(struct fuse_args *args, fuse_lib_help(args); return NULL; } else - return fuse_new(args, op, op_size, user_data); + return fuse_new_31(args, op, op_size, user_data); } /* Explicit prototype to prevent compiler warnings -- cgit v1.2.3