| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
A process may fork after invoking grpc_init() and use gRPC in the child
if and only if the child process first destroys all gRPC resources
inherited from the parent process and invokes grpc_shutdown().
Subsequent to this, the child will be able to re-initialize and use
gRPC. After fork, the parent process will be able to continue to use
existing gRPC resources such as channels and calls without interference
from the child process.
To facilitate gRPC Python applications meeting the above constraints,
gRPC Python will automatically destroy and shutdown all gRPC Core
resources in the child's post-fork handler, including cancelling
in-flight calls (see detailed design below). From the client's
perspective, the child process is now free to create new channels and
use gRPC.
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
This works around issue 15662 which is not as easy to implement as I
would prefer it to be.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This removes invocation-side completion queues from the _cygrpc API.
Invocation-side calls are changed to no longer share the same lifetime
as Core calls.
Illegal metadata is now detected on invocation rather than at the start
of a batch (so passing illegal metadata to a response-streaming method
will now raise an exception immediately rather than later on when
attempting to read the first response message).
It is no longer possible to create a call without immediately starting
at least one batch of operations on it. Only tests are affected by this
change; there are no real use cases in which one wants to start a call
but wait a little while before learning that the server has rejected
it.
It is now required that code above cygrpc.Channel spend threads on
next_event whenever events are pending. A cygrpc.Channel.close method
is introduced, but it merely blocks until the cygrpc.Channel's
completion queues are drained; it does not itself drain them.
Noteworthy here is that we drop the cygrpc.Channel.__dealloc__ method.
It is not the same as __del__ (which is not something that can be added
to cygrpc.Channel) and there is no guarantee that __dealloc__ will be
called at all or that it will be called while the cygrpc.Channel
instance's Python attributes are intact (in testing, I saw both in
different environments). This commit does not knowingly break any
garbage-collection-based memory management working (or "happening to
appear to work in some circumstances"), though if it does, the proper
remedy is to call grpc.Channel.close... which is the objective towards
which this commit builds.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
Eric Gribkoff
Nathaniel Manista
Jan Tattermusch
Masood Malekghassemi