From 9abe3d35bbe866b83abf8c272cdb55542d3b944c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Joey Hess Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2017 14:46:56 -0400 Subject: response --- .../comment_1_a3c41731dbbcd53715c205e29ab99e4e._comment | 17 +++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/forum/removing_information_from_special_remote_file/comment_1_a3c41731dbbcd53715c205e29ab99e4e._comment (limited to 'doc') diff --git a/doc/forum/removing_information_from_special_remote_file/comment_1_a3c41731dbbcd53715c205e29ab99e4e._comment b/doc/forum/removing_information_from_special_remote_file/comment_1_a3c41731dbbcd53715c205e29ab99e4e._comment new file mode 100644 index 000000000..e117af21d --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/forum/removing_information_from_special_remote_file/comment_1_a3c41731dbbcd53715c205e29ab99e4e._comment @@ -0,0 +1,17 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="joey" + subject="""comment 1""" + date="2017-06-06T18:40:54Z" + content=""" +Even if you remove the information from the remote log, it would still be +there in the git history of the file. + +The thing to do, then, is to not store those capabilities in git at all. + +If you have a use case for using tahoe without storing the capability in +git, we could talk about implementing that. + +I don't see how it would be useful to store content in tahoe if you can't +get it back out, so seems that some form of encryption would need to be +involved. Perhaps it could encrypt it using your gpg key or something? +"""]] -- cgit v1.2.3