From 8a0ade26a79526b529659b3ebdaac942d2e99a60 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Steve Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2013 23:51:53 +0000 Subject: Added a comment --- .../comment_2_5e1ad57420efd16ae09c9e5cad55b5f2._comment | 13 +++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/bugs/git_annex_unused_considers_remote_branches_which_makes_it_inconsistent/comment_2_5e1ad57420efd16ae09c9e5cad55b5f2._comment (limited to 'doc') diff --git a/doc/bugs/git_annex_unused_considers_remote_branches_which_makes_it_inconsistent/comment_2_5e1ad57420efd16ae09c9e5cad55b5f2._comment b/doc/bugs/git_annex_unused_considers_remote_branches_which_makes_it_inconsistent/comment_2_5e1ad57420efd16ae09c9e5cad55b5f2._comment new file mode 100644 index 000000000..ffc0359a8 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/bugs/git_annex_unused_considers_remote_branches_which_makes_it_inconsistent/comment_2_5e1ad57420efd16ae09c9e5cad55b5f2._comment @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="Steve" + ip="92.104.175.136" + subject="comment 2" + date="2013-01-01T23:51:53Z" + content=""" +I filed the bug because I thought the inconsistent behavior was bad. For example; If you move the data to a repo which doesn't know about the unsynced remote, it'll happily get dropped with dropunused as opposed to being considered in use in the current repo. + +There probably aren't too many people who want to have remotes set that are usually unreachable, and I can work around it now that I know it exists. + +If it is expected behavior, feel free to close the bug. + +"""]] -- cgit v1.2.3