From 809c34e0edb08ff3dc8e16929243d90a6860ecdb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "https://me.yahoo.com/a/EbvxpTI_xP9Aod7Mg4cwGhgjrCrdM5s-#7c0f4" Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2016 03:04:26 +0000 Subject: Added a comment: would it be possible to get a branch only with annexed content? --- .../comment_1_5bdbf54ae75f77c69c8f557f4dbac13d._comment | 10 ++++++++++ 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/design/adjusted_branches/comment_1_5bdbf54ae75f77c69c8f557f4dbac13d._comment (limited to 'doc') diff --git a/doc/design/adjusted_branches/comment_1_5bdbf54ae75f77c69c8f557f4dbac13d._comment b/doc/design/adjusted_branches/comment_1_5bdbf54ae75f77c69c8f557f4dbac13d._comment new file mode 100644 index 000000000..36f2db306 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/design/adjusted_branches/comment_1_5bdbf54ae75f77c69c8f557f4dbac13d._comment @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="https://me.yahoo.com/a/EbvxpTI_xP9Aod7Mg4cwGhgjrCrdM5s-#7c0f4" + subject="would it be possible to get a branch only with annexed content?" + date="2016-02-25T03:04:26Z" + content=""" +I am yet to grasp all the glorious plans here, but wondered to ask: it seems like it then should be possible to establish a branch only with annexed archive? may be matching some preferred content expression? +Usecase: a relatively large git/annex repository mixing in code, large data files, and some pre-built binaries. If I could seamlessly and reproducibly (with the progress of their master) tease those apart (for separate Debian packaging ;)), that would be really handy + +[[!meta author=yoh]] +"""]] -- cgit v1.2.3