From 3904d2e4b90a7a36b3e4a8ed58caebbd7fc0ae22 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "https://www.google.com/accounts/o8/id?id=AItOawnpdM9F8VbtQ_H5PaPMpGSxPe_d5L1eJ6w" Date: Sun, 3 Jul 2011 11:32:17 +0000 Subject: --- doc/bugs/annex_unannex__47__uninit_should_handle_copies.mdwn | 8 ++++++++ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/bugs/annex_unannex__47__uninit_should_handle_copies.mdwn (limited to 'doc') diff --git a/doc/bugs/annex_unannex__47__uninit_should_handle_copies.mdwn b/doc/bugs/annex_unannex__47__uninit_should_handle_copies.mdwn new file mode 100644 index 000000000..6d1799cd7 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/bugs/annex_unannex__47__uninit_should_handle_copies.mdwn @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@ +Just starting using v3, even more awesome, thanks! + +With git-annex, I take the habit to do copies of files without restriction, as they end up into (cheap) symlink copies. +However, if 2 copies are unannexed, only one is restored, the other becomes a broken symlink, so I kind of loose some information +(my use case: I have a repo on which I recently started using annex, but most of the files, which i would want to be annexed, are only in git, +so my plan is to unninit this repo, delete the .git dir, and then annex everything, as I don't mind the history). + +Rafaël -- cgit v1.2.3