From 27a8a7322290a86e06fa8824c0276ec0ac112216 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "http://joeyh.name/" Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 17:42:10 +0000 Subject: Added a comment --- .../comment_1_a93805a8088402c6dc32d2b9785fcc7d._comment | 10 ++++++++++ 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/todo/Use_bitcoin-mining_ASICs_for_hashing__63__/comment_1_a93805a8088402c6dc32d2b9785fcc7d._comment (limited to 'doc/todo') diff --git a/doc/todo/Use_bitcoin-mining_ASICs_for_hashing__63__/comment_1_a93805a8088402c6dc32d2b9785fcc7d._comment b/doc/todo/Use_bitcoin-mining_ASICs_for_hashing__63__/comment_1_a93805a8088402c6dc32d2b9785fcc7d._comment new file mode 100644 index 000000000..952978834 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/todo/Use_bitcoin-mining_ASICs_for_hashing__63__/comment_1_a93805a8088402c6dc32d2b9785fcc7d._comment @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="http://joeyh.name/" + ip="209.250.56.172" + subject="comment 1" + date="2014-02-20T17:42:10Z" + content=""" +I feel that Helmut has the right approach to this general type of thing. + +I doubt that bitcoin ASICs feature a fast data transfer bus, because bitcoin is a pretty low-data-volume protocol. Additionally AIUI, bitcoin ASICs get their speed by hashing in parallel, which allows them to try many variations of a block at once. So they probably rely on most of the data remaining the same and only a small amount changing. So it's doubtful this would be a win. +"""]] -- cgit v1.2.3