From 44499bbdf8317664e5a2e83aa63c904cefbf64c1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: zooko Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 19:20:39 +0000 Subject: Added a comment: performance --- .../comment_1_0a4793ce6a867638f6e510e71dd4bb44._comment | 10 ++++++++++ 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/todo/tahoe_lfs_for_reals/comment_1_0a4793ce6a867638f6e510e71dd4bb44._comment (limited to 'doc/todo/tahoe_lfs_for_reals') diff --git a/doc/todo/tahoe_lfs_for_reals/comment_1_0a4793ce6a867638f6e510e71dd4bb44._comment b/doc/todo/tahoe_lfs_for_reals/comment_1_0a4793ce6a867638f6e510e71dd4bb44._comment new file mode 100644 index 000000000..16ef882a4 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/todo/tahoe_lfs_for_reals/comment_1_0a4793ce6a867638f6e510e71dd4bb44._comment @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="zooko" + ip="97.118.97.117" + subject="performance" + date="2011-05-17T19:20:39Z" + content=""" +Hm... O(N^2)? I think it just takes O(N). To read an entry out of a directory you have to download the entire directory (and store it in RAM and parse it). The constants are basically \"too big to be good but not big enough to be prohibitive\", I think. jctang has reported that his special remote hook performs well enough to use, but it would be nice if it were faster. + +The Tahoe-LAFS folks are working on speeding up mutable files, by the way, after which we would be able to speed up directories. +"""]] -- cgit v1.2.3