From a757674049507d071d68226acb64d8213bebd5ec Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "http://olivier.berger.myopenid.com/" Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2013 17:40:48 +0000 Subject: Added a comment: rsync remote is basically more intended for backups ? --- .../rsync/comment_7_e122979ea811d9ef835ba05bb936190f._comment | 10 ++++++++++ 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/special_remotes/rsync/comment_7_e122979ea811d9ef835ba05bb936190f._comment (limited to 'doc/special_remotes/rsync') diff --git a/doc/special_remotes/rsync/comment_7_e122979ea811d9ef835ba05bb936190f._comment b/doc/special_remotes/rsync/comment_7_e122979ea811d9ef835ba05bb936190f._comment new file mode 100644 index 000000000..8cb1d72b4 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/special_remotes/rsync/comment_7_e122979ea811d9ef835ba05bb936190f._comment @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="http://olivier.berger.myopenid.com/" + nickname="obergix" + subject="rsync remote is basically more intended for backups ?" + date="2013-08-17T17:40:47Z" + content=""" +If I get it correctly, it is mainly useable as a backup, which will accumulate contents of the objects managed by git-annex over time. + +It would be great to have a use case illustrating its use in concrete matters. Thanks in advance. +"""]] -- cgit v1.2.3