From 0dfc1d4e6eb37aadaba47a210539b2438fba97f5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Joey Hess Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2017 12:55:42 -0400 Subject: remove old closed bugs and todo items to speed up wiki updates and reduce size Remove closed bugs and todos that were last edited or commented before 2017. Command line used: for f in $(grep -l '|done\]\]' -- *.mdwn); do d="$(echo "$f" | sed 's/.mdwn$//')"; if [ -z "$(git log --since=01-01-2017 --pretty=oneline -- "$f")" -a -z "$(git log --since=01-01-2017 --pretty=oneline -- "$d")" ]; then git rm -- "./$f" ; git rm -rf "./$d"; fi; done for f in $(grep -l '\[\[done\]\]' -- *.mdwn); do d="$(echo "$f" | sed 's/.mdwn$//')"; if [ -z "$(git log --since=01-01-2017 --pretty=oneline -- "$f")" -a -z "$(git log --since=01-01-2017 --pretty=oneline -- "$d")" ]; then git rm -- "./$f" ; git rm -rf "./$d"; fi; done --- ...ent_1_5db5f19d9bdc81839d984b7e302e49ed._comment | 23 ---------------------- 1 file changed, 23 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 doc/bugs/info_--json_lists_backend_usage_stats_as_a_list_of_lists/comment_1_5db5f19d9bdc81839d984b7e302e49ed._comment (limited to 'doc/bugs/info_--json_lists_backend_usage_stats_as_a_list_of_lists/comment_1_5db5f19d9bdc81839d984b7e302e49ed._comment') diff --git a/doc/bugs/info_--json_lists_backend_usage_stats_as_a_list_of_lists/comment_1_5db5f19d9bdc81839d984b7e302e49ed._comment b/doc/bugs/info_--json_lists_backend_usage_stats_as_a_list_of_lists/comment_1_5db5f19d9bdc81839d984b7e302e49ed._comment deleted file mode 100644 index 81a999e20..000000000 --- a/doc/bugs/info_--json_lists_backend_usage_stats_as_a_list_of_lists/comment_1_5db5f19d9bdc81839d984b7e302e49ed._comment +++ /dev/null @@ -1,23 +0,0 @@ -[[!comment format=mdwn - username="joey" - subject="""comment 1""" - date="2016-01-01T20:27:27Z" - content=""" -It was indeed a bug that it counted both keys referenced in the work tree -and keys whose content was present. Fixed. - -It's not hard to fix the json format, but then what happens to anything -that may be parsing the existing format? I could use a different field -for the better formatted version and keep the old version in the current -field, but if the goal is to make the json better, that doesn't really -work. - -Since the old output is so funky, it seems likely to me you're the first -one to try to consume it since anyone reasonable would file a but report -about it and you're the first who did. - -So.. I guess I'll change the json format and see if anyone complains. - -I have to say that this business of not having any specification other -than what it currently is, is what annoys me about JSON as a consumer of it. -"""]] -- cgit v1.2.3