From 2e36cd88a2e177b6d7220ddd543387bb1bfa55b5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: stp Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 21:20:15 +0000 Subject: Added a comment: Great improvements --- .../comment_3_be4d0fec56c29cf978ef7d1715eaa516._comment | 14 ++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/bugs/fsck_giving_false_checking_information/comment_3_be4d0fec56c29cf978ef7d1715eaa516._comment (limited to 'doc/bugs/fsck_giving_false_checking_information') diff --git a/doc/bugs/fsck_giving_false_checking_information/comment_3_be4d0fec56c29cf978ef7d1715eaa516._comment b/doc/bugs/fsck_giving_false_checking_information/comment_3_be4d0fec56c29cf978ef7d1715eaa516._comment new file mode 100644 index 000000000..27de72358 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/bugs/fsck_giving_false_checking_information/comment_3_be4d0fec56c29cf978ef7d1715eaa516._comment @@ -0,0 +1,14 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="stp" + ip="84.56.21.11" + subject="Great improvements" + date="2014-02-20T21:20:15Z" + content=""" +Thanks for clearing it up. It is still a bit confusing that you have to differentiate on the second run. (using --more) I probably view it as inconvenient as it make me have to remember the first and second time of running a command. I think it would be cleaner to have \"--incremental\" always skipping files and \"--incremental restart\" start from the beginning. + +Ah great yeah they are different functions and should therefore not interfere. (fsck --fast --incremental) + +Great that the checksum is back in and yeah I agree that it isn't really needed in the add command. + + +"""]] -- cgit v1.2.3