From 18d82459c62f5a27c5fd8d7279cc760486ae82fa Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "https://www.google.com/accounts/o8/id?id=AItOawnpdM9F8VbtQ_H5PaPMpGSxPe_d5L1eJ6w" Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2011 16:57:26 +0000 Subject: Added a comment --- .../comment_1_c896ff6589f62178b60e606771e4f2bf._comment | 10 ++++++++++ 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/bugs/annex_unannex__47__uninit_should_handle_copies/comment_1_c896ff6589f62178b60e606771e4f2bf._comment (limited to 'doc/bugs/annex_unannex__47__uninit_should_handle_copies') diff --git a/doc/bugs/annex_unannex__47__uninit_should_handle_copies/comment_1_c896ff6589f62178b60e606771e4f2bf._comment b/doc/bugs/annex_unannex__47__uninit_should_handle_copies/comment_1_c896ff6589f62178b60e606771e4f2bf._comment new file mode 100644 index 000000000..839992477 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/bugs/annex_unannex__47__uninit_should_handle_copies/comment_1_c896ff6589f62178b60e606771e4f2bf._comment @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="https://www.google.com/accounts/o8/id?id=AItOawnpdM9F8VbtQ_H5PaPMpGSxPe_d5L1eJ6w" + nickname="Rafaël" + subject="comment 1" + date="2011-07-04T16:57:25Z" + content=""" +You convince me for unannex, but isn't the goal of uninit to revert all annex operations? In the current state, a clean revert is not possible (because of the broken symlinks after uninit). Instead of copying, using hard links is out of question? + +For my needs, is the command \"git annex unlock .\" (from the root of the repo) a correct workaround? +"""]] -- cgit v1.2.3