From 3bcc0efea0cfa00ec4bca033a61678a74f936332 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Joey Hess Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2016 13:57:26 -0400 Subject: comment --- ...ent_1_f5643bafe724c98a6dc810adb2ea931a._comment | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/bugs/__34__sha256sum_failed__34___for_some_files_with_newest_Android_client/comment_1_f5643bafe724c98a6dc810adb2ea931a._comment (limited to 'doc/bugs/__34__sha256sum_failed__34___for_some_files_with_newest_Android_client') diff --git a/doc/bugs/__34__sha256sum_failed__34___for_some_files_with_newest_Android_client/comment_1_f5643bafe724c98a6dc810adb2ea931a._comment b/doc/bugs/__34__sha256sum_failed__34___for_some_files_with_newest_Android_client/comment_1_f5643bafe724c98a6dc810adb2ea931a._comment new file mode 100644 index 000000000..7fe44973f --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/bugs/__34__sha256sum_failed__34___for_some_files_with_newest_Android_client/comment_1_f5643bafe724c98a6dc810adb2ea931a._comment @@ -0,0 +1,24 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="joey" + subject="""comment 1""" + date="2016-09-05T17:19:43Z" + content=""" +That warning message indicates that the `sha256sum` command is exiting nonzero. +git-annex handles that failure by using its internal SHA, which apparently +succeeds, because the `fsck` output ends with "ok". Indeed, I don't see any +indication that this is causing any problems, other than a warning +message. + +The size variation is due to git-annex only using `sha256sum` for +larger files, where it can be faster than the internal SHA. + +Android is supposed to have `sha256sum` and `sha1sum` available +(but not some of the other sizes). They are included in the git-annex +bundle, in eg /data/data/ga.androidterm/bin/ along with lots of other +busybox utilities. + +So, the problem seems to be that either those commands are not in your +android device somehow, or indeed a reversion in the git-annex Android +build has lost them, or perhaps they're included but are always failing to +work. +"""]] -- cgit v1.2.3