From 7499bc0759f74745be7614dc93edc6ee9af7f357 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: zardoz Date: Sat, 17 May 2014 14:16:12 +0000 Subject: Added a comment --- ...comment_2_0ede40e0d68bfb9c6dbc1777f944ed06._comment | 18 ++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/bugs/Revert_to_old_file_version_in_direct_mode___40__VFAT__41__/comment_2_0ede40e0d68bfb9c6dbc1777f944ed06._comment (limited to 'doc/bugs/Revert_to_old_file_version_in_direct_mode___40__VFAT__41__/comment_2_0ede40e0d68bfb9c6dbc1777f944ed06._comment') diff --git a/doc/bugs/Revert_to_old_file_version_in_direct_mode___40__VFAT__41__/comment_2_0ede40e0d68bfb9c6dbc1777f944ed06._comment b/doc/bugs/Revert_to_old_file_version_in_direct_mode___40__VFAT__41__/comment_2_0ede40e0d68bfb9c6dbc1777f944ed06._comment new file mode 100644 index 000000000..066fefa0c --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/bugs/Revert_to_old_file_version_in_direct_mode___40__VFAT__41__/comment_2_0ede40e0d68bfb9c6dbc1777f944ed06._comment @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="zardoz" + ip="92.227.51.179" + subject="comment 2" + date="2014-05-17T14:16:12Z" + content=""" +One follow-up comment, because it occurred to me I might have phrased +the bug inadequately. By «revert» I didn’t mean a revert in the +git-sense, but merely «checking out» a file from a selected commit. + +But I think I can achieve this in direct mode on VFAT by doing «git +show upstream/branch~X:file > file», right? «git annex get file» then +gets the correct content, only that it will not place the content into +the indicated file until I do «git annex fsck». Maybe «git annex get» +could take this into account and have the content immediately stored +there. + +"""]] -- cgit v1.2.3