From fc191616517215c173a0b3bb8102311ca91e9766 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Joey Hess Date: Tue, 26 May 2015 11:00:57 -0400 Subject: old version bug; not present in current version --- ...for_files_that_are_not_present_in_current_repository.mdwn | 2 ++ .../comment_1_adbde1bbeb434f42f96cae7d3ad5b65f._comment | 12 ++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/bugs/incremental_fsck-ing_a_remote_does_not_work_for_files_that_are_not_present_in_current_repository/comment_1_adbde1bbeb434f42f96cae7d3ad5b65f._comment diff --git a/doc/bugs/incremental_fsck-ing_a_remote_does_not_work_for_files_that_are_not_present_in_current_repository.mdwn b/doc/bugs/incremental_fsck-ing_a_remote_does_not_work_for_files_that_are_not_present_in_current_repository.mdwn index ffc3acb6b..3b53866e3 100644 --- a/doc/bugs/incremental_fsck-ing_a_remote_does_not_work_for_files_that_are_not_present_in_current_repository.mdwn +++ b/doc/bugs/incremental_fsck-ing_a_remote_does_not_work_for_files_that_are_not_present_in_current_repository.mdwn @@ -101,3 +101,5 @@ ok giovanni@amalgama:/tmp/test (master)$ git annex fsck --from test --more giovanni@amalgama:/tmp/test (master)$ """]] + +> [[done]] --[[Joey]] diff --git a/doc/bugs/incremental_fsck-ing_a_remote_does_not_work_for_files_that_are_not_present_in_current_repository/comment_1_adbde1bbeb434f42f96cae7d3ad5b65f._comment b/doc/bugs/incremental_fsck-ing_a_remote_does_not_work_for_files_that_are_not_present_in_current_repository/comment_1_adbde1bbeb434f42f96cae7d3ad5b65f._comment new file mode 100644 index 000000000..9fdc95a88 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/bugs/incremental_fsck-ing_a_remote_does_not_work_for_files_that_are_not_present_in_current_repository/comment_1_adbde1bbeb434f42f96cae7d3ad5b65f._comment @@ -0,0 +1,12 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="joey" + subject="""comment 1""" + date="2015-05-26T14:57:24Z" + content=""" +More recent versions of git-annex don't use the mtime hack, so avoid this +problem. I had not realized that was a benefit of ditching the mtime hack, +actually; it was done for other reasons like keeping separate incremental +fscks of different remotes. + +I have verified that the problem does not exist with current versions. +"""]] -- cgit v1.2.3