From fb9741b7a52f711ca48e0a0e85a96a5917e5b436 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "https://www.google.com/accounts/o8/id?id=AItOawlzlNQbf6wBgv9j6-UqfpXcQyAYMF8S3t4" Date: Sat, 3 Aug 2013 11:44:10 +0000 Subject: --- ...le_to_make_git-sync_not_nullify_symlinks__63__.mdwn | 18 ++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/forum/Is_it_possible_to_make_git-sync_not_nullify_symlinks__63__.mdwn diff --git a/doc/forum/Is_it_possible_to_make_git-sync_not_nullify_symlinks__63__.mdwn b/doc/forum/Is_it_possible_to_make_git-sync_not_nullify_symlinks__63__.mdwn new file mode 100644 index 000000000..1d2c8936b --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/forum/Is_it_possible_to_make_git-sync_not_nullify_symlinks__63__.mdwn @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@ +Hey, + +I've found that git annex works great as a way to publish websites to a web server. I can edit my website on my computer, `git annex sync` my working directory to the VPS, and then `git annex get files-I-want-to-publish`. This works great. I can maintain my normal working directory structure on the VPS and I don't have to worry about people seeing files I DIDN'T want to publish, since the dead symlinks just show up as 404s. + +There's one small problem. + +Say: + + 1) I've already published a file using `git annex get file-to-update` + 2) I update that file on my computer + 3) I do `git annex sync` + 4) I do `git annex get file-to-update` + +Between steps 3 and 4, file-to-update goes from being an accessible web resource to being a dead symlink. It's not really a problem for me, as hardly anyone visits my site. But it would be nice if I could make `sync` leave the old symlink to the old file until I `get`ed the new one. + +Is this possible? + +PS: For those who might follow in my footsteps, remember that you probably don't want people reading the contents of your .git dir, so make a re-write rule for this! -- cgit v1.2.3