From f7c0f4b26cec6c616d0892c2d5f5c4100a218481 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "https://me.yahoo.com/a/EbvxpTI_xP9Aod7Mg4cwGhgjrCrdM5s-#7c0f4" Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2016 20:11:43 +0000 Subject: added meta field for myself --- ..._39___to_provide_information_either_content_is_locally_present.mdwn | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) diff --git a/doc/todo/__39__info_filename__39___to_provide_information_either_content_is_locally_present.mdwn b/doc/todo/__39__info_filename__39___to_provide_information_either_content_is_locally_present.mdwn index 05737f621..590595b0f 100644 --- a/doc/todo/__39__info_filename__39___to_provide_information_either_content_is_locally_present.mdwn +++ b/doc/todo/__39__info_filename__39___to_provide_information_either_content_is_locally_present.mdwn @@ -1 +1,4 @@ ATM in DataLad we rely on 'git annex find' to determine either files have content locally. Even though it could be used in a batch mode, I wondered if we could may be just use 'annex info' to obtain information either a file (or a key) has content locally? Another benefit would be is that within single command output we could determine also if a file under annex or not (instead of first doing e.g. 'info' to figure out if under annex and then 'find' again to figure out if content is present locally) + + +[[!meta author=yoh]] -- cgit v1.2.3