From f664a2538a848d204922de908fac9add7c1db0fe Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Joey Hess Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 12:18:50 -0400 Subject: fix --- doc/todo/tahoe_lfs_for_reals.mdwn | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/doc/todo/tahoe_lfs_for_reals.mdwn b/doc/todo/tahoe_lfs_for_reals.mdwn index 053a763d7..4e0bf2fb1 100644 --- a/doc/todo/tahoe_lfs_for_reals.mdwn +++ b/doc/todo/tahoe_lfs_for_reals.mdwn @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ hash subdirectories in Tahoe is expensive. Instead it would be good to use it as a key/value store directly. The catch is that doing so involves sending the content to Tahoe, and getting back a key identifier. -This would be fairly easy to do as a [[backend]], which can assign its +This would be fairly easy to do as a [[backend|backends]], which can assign its own key names (although typically done before data is stored in it), but a tahoe-lafs special remote would be more flexible. -- cgit v1.2.3