From ef39e6786c2bf96d8de0785bef534f41bd808984 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Yurt Date: Tue, 16 May 2017 20:25:03 +0000 Subject: Added a comment: Encrypt to different subkeys? --- .../comment_9_5ca10891d642392aaff342c1478b0550._comment | 10 ++++++++++ 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/encryption/comment_9_5ca10891d642392aaff342c1478b0550._comment diff --git a/doc/encryption/comment_9_5ca10891d642392aaff342c1478b0550._comment b/doc/encryption/comment_9_5ca10891d642392aaff342c1478b0550._comment new file mode 100644 index 000000000..723e3df2d --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/encryption/comment_9_5ca10891d642392aaff342c1478b0550._comment @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="Yurt" + avatar="http://cdn.libravatar.org/avatar/28d2177f7678c6cc0b677c34927eba06" + subject="Encrypt to different subkeys?" + date="2017-05-16T20:25:01Z" + content=""" +Is it possible to encrypt with subkeys. I have a few subkeys distributed to different computers and I'd like to be able to sync to a special remote with all of them. Right now, if the master key is stripped, I get an error from gpg. + +I do this exact thing with password-store. Appending \"!\" to the subkey id should force gpg to use that specific key: [https://lists.zx2c4.com/pipermail/password-store/2014-September/001131.html](https://lists.zx2c4.com/pipermail/password-store/2014-September/001131.html). +"""]] -- cgit v1.2.3