From 79453bac58dd24db33ca0c0e80b0dfb4277447f3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "anthony@ad39673d230d75cbfd19d2757d754030049c7673" Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2017 22:01:57 +0000 Subject: Added a comment --- .../comment_1_4c37e6f9ac1e1571495b0d355c8af9ff._comment | 11 +++++++++++ 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/devblog/day_468__export_renames/comment_1_4c37e6f9ac1e1571495b0d355c8af9ff._comment diff --git a/doc/devblog/day_468__export_renames/comment_1_4c37e6f9ac1e1571495b0d355c8af9ff._comment b/doc/devblog/day_468__export_renames/comment_1_4c37e6f9ac1e1571495b0d355c8af9ff._comment new file mode 100644 index 000000000..b9bc07ee4 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/devblog/day_468__export_renames/comment_1_4c37e6f9ac1e1571495b0d355c8af9ff._comment @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="anthony@ad39673d230d75cbfd19d2757d754030049c7673" + nickname="anthony" + avatar="http://cdn.libravatar.org/avatar/05b48b72766177b3b0a6ff4afdb70790" + subject="comment 1" + date="2017-09-06T22:01:57Z" + content=""" +Looking forward to the export support! + +Just curious (and I apologize in advance for any nightmares induced) did you consider the case of four files, A–D, where (content-wise) A=B and C=D and the change is to swap A/C and B/D? That'd potentially be an issue, since four files want to share two temporary names. Unless of course it's all only done with pairwise swaps. +"""]] -- cgit v1.2.3 From a1ea9411ad4cc9ae6927fbf5782cd514f5d03ae3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Horus Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2017 09:30:53 +0000 Subject: Added a comment --- .../comment_1_82095cef37dd815bcd1d101a1715e3c7._comment | 12 ++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/forum/Is_there_a_way_to_unannex_some_file___63__/comment_1_82095cef37dd815bcd1d101a1715e3c7._comment diff --git a/doc/forum/Is_there_a_way_to_unannex_some_file___63__/comment_1_82095cef37dd815bcd1d101a1715e3c7._comment b/doc/forum/Is_there_a_way_to_unannex_some_file___63__/comment_1_82095cef37dd815bcd1d101a1715e3c7._comment new file mode 100644 index 000000000..0f87f1460 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/forum/Is_there_a_way_to_unannex_some_file___63__/comment_1_82095cef37dd815bcd1d101a1715e3c7._comment @@ -0,0 +1,12 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="Horus" + avatar="http://cdn.libravatar.org/avatar/8f0ee08b98ea5bba76c3fe112c08851c" + subject="comment 1" + date="2017-09-07T09:30:53Z" + content=""" +Well, there is ```git unannex ...``` + + + +Is that what you're looking for? +"""]] -- cgit v1.2.3 From 9e63f3f7f6cd248779a1ea9b2d843fdedf683dee Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Horus Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2017 09:38:29 +0000 Subject: --- doc/forum/Shared_directory_with_non_git-annex_users.mdwn | 15 +++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/forum/Shared_directory_with_non_git-annex_users.mdwn diff --git a/doc/forum/Shared_directory_with_non_git-annex_users.mdwn b/doc/forum/Shared_directory_with_non_git-annex_users.mdwn new file mode 100644 index 000000000..b6e9d5aaa --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/forum/Shared_directory_with_non_git-annex_users.mdwn @@ -0,0 +1,15 @@ +Hello, + +I want to use git-annex on a directory that also other persons, without git-annex use, i.e. modify, add and remove files to. + +What need I consider when doing that? + + * Use indirect mode + * The the .git directory somewhere else? + * Be prepared that a ```git annex get``` can always bring up checksum problems because someone modified the file + +I assume git-annex checksums before pushing to the repo, so that I don't otherwrite someone elses changes. + +What else? + +Thanks! -- cgit v1.2.3