From e1cf30ce70ee9b6dacf340fa390a6f0c0334f82e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "https://launchpad.net/~krastanov-stefan" Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2014 15:07:14 +0000 Subject: Added a comment: Status of this issue --- .../comment_2_c6bc3e79263a17d0e731f6ae0a6f2d85._comment | 8 ++++++++ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/todo/Slow_transfer_for_a_lot_of_small_files./comment_2_c6bc3e79263a17d0e731f6ae0a6f2d85._comment diff --git a/doc/todo/Slow_transfer_for_a_lot_of_small_files./comment_2_c6bc3e79263a17d0e731f6ae0a6f2d85._comment b/doc/todo/Slow_transfer_for_a_lot_of_small_files./comment_2_c6bc3e79263a17d0e731f6ae0a6f2d85._comment new file mode 100644 index 000000000..41168a7d4 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/todo/Slow_transfer_for_a_lot_of_small_files./comment_2_c6bc3e79263a17d0e731f6ae0a6f2d85._comment @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="https://launchpad.net/~krastanov-stefan" + nickname="krastanov-stefan" + subject="Status of this issue" + date="2014-12-27T15:07:14Z" + content=""" +I was unable to find a way to tell git-annex that certain remotes should receive multiple transfers in parallel. Is this implemented yet or on the roadmap? If neither would modifying the webapp to bear this logic without touching git-annex itself be a solution (asking mainly because it can be done with a greasemonkey script)? +"""]] -- cgit v1.2.3