From ead1d5c2e47d9536c579d5463c38086c5a51a14c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "https://www.google.com/accounts/o8/id?id=AItOawm9ocq1Kb0WL-cz-LPpvd2Xm-q8tIQvqXA" Date: Fri, 16 May 2014 22:58:52 +0000 Subject: Added a comment: debian squeeze --- .../comment_16_89f67da4a4a6a626a7db9c6674b244b6._comment | 11 +++++++++++ 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/install/Debian/comment_16_89f67da4a4a6a626a7db9c6674b244b6._comment diff --git a/doc/install/Debian/comment_16_89f67da4a4a6a626a7db9c6674b244b6._comment b/doc/install/Debian/comment_16_89f67da4a4a6a626a7db9c6674b244b6._comment new file mode 100644 index 000000000..563be1c6c --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/install/Debian/comment_16_89f67da4a4a6a626a7db9c6674b244b6._comment @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="https://www.google.com/accounts/o8/id?id=AItOawm9ocq1Kb0WL-cz-LPpvd2Xm-q8tIQvqXA" + nickname="Dominik" + subject="debian squeeze" + date="2014-05-16T22:58:52Z" + content=""" +I'm tring to set up a bare repo on a debian squeeze server and sync it to windows client. Unfortunately the direct mode does not seem to be available for the git-annex version (3.20120629~bpo60+2 +) in the squeeze-backports + +Would you be able to update the version in that repository? Thank you for your hard work! Git-annex is awesome +"""]] -- cgit v1.2.3 From 51951a3891450eef28628a72f0b744cc0ea33fb5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "https://www.google.com/accounts/o8/id?id=AItOawm9ocq1Kb0WL-cz-LPpvd2Xm-q8tIQvqXA" Date: Fri, 16 May 2014 23:05:28 +0000 Subject: Added a comment: multiple git-annex assistant processes --- .../comment_14_79fc0ff98c5bba2ed616e52e5a58e28f._comment | 8 ++++++++ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/todo/windows_support/comment_14_79fc0ff98c5bba2ed616e52e5a58e28f._comment diff --git a/doc/todo/windows_support/comment_14_79fc0ff98c5bba2ed616e52e5a58e28f._comment b/doc/todo/windows_support/comment_14_79fc0ff98c5bba2ed616e52e5a58e28f._comment new file mode 100644 index 000000000..9d7fb9ff0 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/todo/windows_support/comment_14_79fc0ff98c5bba2ed616e52e5a58e28f._comment @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="https://www.google.com/accounts/o8/id?id=AItOawm9ocq1Kb0WL-cz-LPpvd2Xm-q8tIQvqXA" + nickname="Dominik" + subject="multiple git-annex assistant processes" + date="2014-05-16T23:05:28Z" + content=""" +shouldn't be a problem though if all processes are spawned from the same service though, right? Or what problems did you have in mind? +"""]] -- cgit v1.2.3 From 5ca009d267d199d9375dd53b8f069c1503eed0a6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "https://www.google.com/accounts/o8/id?id=AItOawm9ocq1Kb0WL-cz-LPpvd2Xm-q8tIQvqXA" Date: Fri, 16 May 2014 23:06:38 +0000 Subject: Added a comment: multiple git-annex assistant processes --- .../comment_15_7a49d9b367a9a2621a51c30c4502cdac._comment | 8 ++++++++ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/todo/windows_support/comment_15_7a49d9b367a9a2621a51c30c4502cdac._comment diff --git a/doc/todo/windows_support/comment_15_7a49d9b367a9a2621a51c30c4502cdac._comment b/doc/todo/windows_support/comment_15_7a49d9b367a9a2621a51c30c4502cdac._comment new file mode 100644 index 000000000..8f484dfb7 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/todo/windows_support/comment_15_7a49d9b367a9a2621a51c30c4502cdac._comment @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="https://www.google.com/accounts/o8/id?id=AItOawm9ocq1Kb0WL-cz-LPpvd2Xm-q8tIQvqXA" + nickname="Dominik" + subject="multiple git-annex assistant processes" + date="2014-05-16T23:06:38Z" + content=""" +shouldn't be a problem though if all processes are spawned from the same service though, right? Or what problems did you have in mind? +"""]] -- cgit v1.2.3 From 51ec4941ab197fd12e19670e9448b7214b45f5c1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "https://www.google.com/accounts/o8/id?id=AItOawmNu4V5fvpLlBhaCUfXXOB0MI5NXwh8SkU" Date: Sat, 17 May 2014 00:23:03 +0000 Subject: Added a comment --- .../comment_3_3bec1f02ff1a61791e3cbb428c7acb4c._comment | 12 ++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/forum/Storing_git_repos_in_git-annex/comment_3_3bec1f02ff1a61791e3cbb428c7acb4c._comment diff --git a/doc/forum/Storing_git_repos_in_git-annex/comment_3_3bec1f02ff1a61791e3cbb428c7acb4c._comment b/doc/forum/Storing_git_repos_in_git-annex/comment_3_3bec1f02ff1a61791e3cbb428c7acb4c._comment new file mode 100644 index 000000000..69da79a89 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/forum/Storing_git_repos_in_git-annex/comment_3_3bec1f02ff1a61791e3cbb428c7acb4c._comment @@ -0,0 +1,12 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="https://www.google.com/accounts/o8/id?id=AItOawmNu4V5fvpLlBhaCUfXXOB0MI5NXwh8SkU" + nickname="Adam" + subject="comment 3" + date="2014-05-17T00:23:02Z" + content=""" +Well, like Pere, I am rather surprised by your response, Joey. I've been an enthusiastic supporter and follower of git-annex for a long time now, and have been looking forward to using it. I didn't expect a snarky reply...and you said yourself that it was snarky. Maybe you had a bad day or something? :) + +I don't understand why this request or idea is so controversial to you. I have several computers, and I use git to store basic text files like shell scripts and config files--a very common situation. I use Dropbox to sync them automatically between computers. I could use just git, and push/pull manually, but the whole point of having computers is for them to do things for me, automatically. The purpose of the git-annex assistant, as I understand it, is to do exactly that. Doing the push/pull manually would be a step backwards. And giving up manual control of the git repository, losing the ability to track changes to my files, would be a huge step backwards. + +This seems like it must be a very common use case among Linux users, especially ones who use the shell, git, etc. If git-annex isn't good for this situation, what is? Surely there's a better way than opening a shell and running \"git pull\" every time I walk from one computer to the other. +"""]] -- cgit v1.2.3 From 5ec26da118c954dbbb3e05fd696f11a4cfd9c011 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "https://www.google.com/accounts/o8/id?id=AItOawmNu4V5fvpLlBhaCUfXXOB0MI5NXwh8SkU" Date: Sat, 17 May 2014 00:41:06 +0000 Subject: Added a comment --- .../comment_4_76ddbd27cc2f3785bb5aaebb0bb6e087._comment | 14 ++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/forum/Storing_git_repos_in_git-annex/comment_4_76ddbd27cc2f3785bb5aaebb0bb6e087._comment diff --git a/doc/forum/Storing_git_repos_in_git-annex/comment_4_76ddbd27cc2f3785bb5aaebb0bb6e087._comment b/doc/forum/Storing_git_repos_in_git-annex/comment_4_76ddbd27cc2f3785bb5aaebb0bb6e087._comment new file mode 100644 index 000000000..9d0b024c1 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/forum/Storing_git_repos_in_git-annex/comment_4_76ddbd27cc2f3785bb5aaebb0bb6e087._comment @@ -0,0 +1,14 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="https://www.google.com/accounts/o8/id?id=AItOawmNu4V5fvpLlBhaCUfXXOB0MI5NXwh8SkU" + nickname="Adam" + subject="comment 4" + date="2014-05-17T00:41:04Z" + content=""" +I should have also mentioned, the network topology is an issue that git-annex helps solve. When my computers are on the same LAN, they could obviously sync directly with each other using git. But when they are not on the same network, or when one of them is not online, a transfer repo is needed. Dropbox and git-annex make this simple by handling it for me. + +But if I did all my syncing with git manually, it could end up being quite a mess. If I took my laptop with me and left the house without syncing it first, I'd have to sync with my server on the Internet. But if I forgot to push from my desktop computer before I left, the server would be out-of-date, and I'd be stuck. + +Dropbox handles this for me by automatically syncing as soon as I make changes. git-annex does the same thing, but doesn't work with nested git repos. But giving up the nested git repo would mean giving up version control of my files. As a developer, you understand why that's not an option! :) + +Again, this seems like a very natural problem to run into, and I don't understand why it is controversial to want git-annex to handle this the way Dropbox or other sync software (e.g. SpiderOak, Wuala) can. +"""]] -- cgit v1.2.3 From a3d4a2eee28e2114fd49404242e6d20ee11b9101 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "https://www.google.com/accounts/o8/id?id=AItOawnov5q9_Cl4Ps5NoYE08yE01NLSvBANnY8" Date: Sat, 17 May 2014 09:21:43 +0000 Subject: --- ...Git_Annex_Assistant_won__39__t_backup_files_to_removable_drive.mdwn | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/forum/Git_Annex_Assistant_won__39__t_backup_files_to_removable_drive.mdwn diff --git a/doc/forum/Git_Annex_Assistant_won__39__t_backup_files_to_removable_drive.mdwn b/doc/forum/Git_Annex_Assistant_won__39__t_backup_files_to_removable_drive.mdwn new file mode 100644 index 000000000..20e435fcf --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/forum/Git_Annex_Assistant_won__39__t_backup_files_to_removable_drive.mdwn @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +I'm using Git Annex Assistant for the first time, trying to get it to mirror a directory of files from my computer to an external USB drive. I've tried setting up the second repo as a "Removable Drive" in the "full backup" repository group. I've also tried putting it in the "client" group. The result is the same, and Assistant doesn't backup any of my files to the external drive. + +What I get in the external drive in the directory that should contain the repo are the set of files "annex, objects, refs, config, HEAD" and they are NOT in a .git subdirectory. Aside from this I don't see any of the files Git Annex Assistant says it has synced. As this is my first time using the Assistant, I don't know if this is a bug, or if I'm just using it incorrectly. If anyone knows what is going on here, please share. -- cgit v1.2.3 From 4905712892c959d95461b840c76b47924be9955d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "https://www.google.com/accounts/o8/id?id=AItOawkAUMhKOSkh9JaBA6xst3XxQIIsDEq5Zd4" Date: Sat, 17 May 2014 10:56:22 +0000 Subject: Added a comment --- ...ent_4_907f3b1cfe745abf94a6a8ba0dbd4396._comment | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/forum/folder_size_question/comment_4_907f3b1cfe745abf94a6a8ba0dbd4396._comment diff --git a/doc/forum/folder_size_question/comment_4_907f3b1cfe745abf94a6a8ba0dbd4396._comment b/doc/forum/folder_size_question/comment_4_907f3b1cfe745abf94a6a8ba0dbd4396._comment new file mode 100644 index 000000000..a32e9177a --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/forum/folder_size_question/comment_4_907f3b1cfe745abf94a6a8ba0dbd4396._comment @@ -0,0 +1,25 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="https://www.google.com/accounts/o8/id?id=AItOawkAUMhKOSkh9JaBA6xst3XxQIIsDEq5Zd4" + nickname="Ovidiu" + subject="comment 4" + date="2014-05-17T10:56:22Z" + content=""" +I thinks its all the small files. + + du -hs /Users/ovi/Sharing/git-annex/ + 77M /Users/ovi/Sharing/git-annex/ + + du -hs /Users/ovi/Sharing/git-annex/Finance/ + 38M /Users/ovi/Sharing/git-annex/Finance/ + + du -hs /Users/ovi/Sharing/git-annex/.git/ + 39M /Users/ovi/Sharing/git-annex/.git/ + +The GUI shows: + 46 136 859 bytes (80,6 MB on disk) for 8 002 items + +And the hidden .git folder shows: + 7 373 616 bytes (41 MB on disk) for 7 625 items + +So apparently there are a lot of very small files, smaller than the blocksize hence the info is skewed? Anyway, I think its alright? +"""]] -- cgit v1.2.3 From 41c49d08e4a5131582ce0934977c1cf9a15c6162 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: hyperio Date: Sat, 17 May 2014 12:22:18 +0000 Subject: Added a comment: Still not working --- ...comment_2_adfa582d611ca501e21110282df07315._comment | 18 ++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/forum/Special_remote_public_key_encryption_issue/comment_2_adfa582d611ca501e21110282df07315._comment diff --git a/doc/forum/Special_remote_public_key_encryption_issue/comment_2_adfa582d611ca501e21110282df07315._comment b/doc/forum/Special_remote_public_key_encryption_issue/comment_2_adfa582d611ca501e21110282df07315._comment new file mode 100644 index 000000000..8e2753530 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/forum/Special_remote_public_key_encryption_issue/comment_2_adfa582d611ca501e21110282df07315._comment @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="hyperio" + ip="62.31.92.216" + subject="Still not working" + date="2014-05-17T12:22:17Z" + content=""" +Thank you for your reply. I copied over the public key from computer 2 to computer 1 and tried to add it using git annex enableremote box.com keyid+=[keyid]. I am then asked for the passphrase for my private key on computer 1. Afterwards I am asked for the passphrase for the private key on computer 2... why? Obviously I don't have it so I get + +gpg: can't query passphrase in batch mode +gpg: decryption failed: secret key not available + +git-annex: user error (gpg [\"--quiet\",\"--trust-model\",\"always\",\"--batch\",\"--decrypt\"] exited 2) + +Why would I need computer 2's secret key? Or I might just get it completely wrong. +Also, can the passphrase be remembered somewhere, so that I can use the assistant? (otherwise I think it won't work, because I would have to type the passphrase at every synchronisation attempt). + +Sorry for my confusion, thanks for your support. +"""]] -- cgit v1.2.3 From c68f21429316444d851a9aa84c08f90f05a94c03 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "https://www.google.com/accounts/o8/id?id=AItOawm9ocq1Kb0WL-cz-LPpvd2Xm-q8tIQvqXA" Date: Sat, 17 May 2014 13:39:59 +0000 Subject: removed --- .../comment_15_7a49d9b367a9a2621a51c30c4502cdac._comment | 8 -------- 1 file changed, 8 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 doc/todo/windows_support/comment_15_7a49d9b367a9a2621a51c30c4502cdac._comment diff --git a/doc/todo/windows_support/comment_15_7a49d9b367a9a2621a51c30c4502cdac._comment b/doc/todo/windows_support/comment_15_7a49d9b367a9a2621a51c30c4502cdac._comment deleted file mode 100644 index 8f484dfb7..000000000 --- a/doc/todo/windows_support/comment_15_7a49d9b367a9a2621a51c30c4502cdac._comment +++ /dev/null @@ -1,8 +0,0 @@ -[[!comment format=mdwn - username="https://www.google.com/accounts/o8/id?id=AItOawm9ocq1Kb0WL-cz-LPpvd2Xm-q8tIQvqXA" - nickname="Dominik" - subject="multiple git-annex assistant processes" - date="2014-05-16T23:06:38Z" - content=""" -shouldn't be a problem though if all processes are spawned from the same service though, right? Or what problems did you have in mind? -"""]] -- cgit v1.2.3 From 7499bc0759f74745be7614dc93edc6ee9af7f357 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: zardoz Date: Sat, 17 May 2014 14:16:12 +0000 Subject: Added a comment --- ...comment_2_0ede40e0d68bfb9c6dbc1777f944ed06._comment | 18 ++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/bugs/Revert_to_old_file_version_in_direct_mode___40__VFAT__41__/comment_2_0ede40e0d68bfb9c6dbc1777f944ed06._comment diff --git a/doc/bugs/Revert_to_old_file_version_in_direct_mode___40__VFAT__41__/comment_2_0ede40e0d68bfb9c6dbc1777f944ed06._comment b/doc/bugs/Revert_to_old_file_version_in_direct_mode___40__VFAT__41__/comment_2_0ede40e0d68bfb9c6dbc1777f944ed06._comment new file mode 100644 index 000000000..066fefa0c --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/bugs/Revert_to_old_file_version_in_direct_mode___40__VFAT__41__/comment_2_0ede40e0d68bfb9c6dbc1777f944ed06._comment @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="zardoz" + ip="92.227.51.179" + subject="comment 2" + date="2014-05-17T14:16:12Z" + content=""" +One follow-up comment, because it occurred to me I might have phrased +the bug inadequately. By «revert» I didn’t mean a revert in the +git-sense, but merely «checking out» a file from a selected commit. + +But I think I can achieve this in direct mode on VFAT by doing «git +show upstream/branch~X:file > file», right? «git annex get file» then +gets the correct content, only that it will not place the content into +the indicated file until I do «git annex fsck». Maybe «git annex get» +could take this into account and have the content immediately stored +there. + +"""]] -- cgit v1.2.3 From c9536f2497367dd8b5a9f23e6b83938c004efc43 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: zardoz Date: Sat, 17 May 2014 14:18:32 +0000 Subject: Added a comment --- .../comment_2_45c22f596a18d5dc2331cfeef8c767fa._comment | 12 ++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/todo/A_Way_To_Extract_Previous_Versions_of_a_File_From_a_Direct_Repo/comment_2_45c22f596a18d5dc2331cfeef8c767fa._comment diff --git a/doc/todo/A_Way_To_Extract_Previous_Versions_of_a_File_From_a_Direct_Repo/comment_2_45c22f596a18d5dc2331cfeef8c767fa._comment b/doc/todo/A_Way_To_Extract_Previous_Versions_of_a_File_From_a_Direct_Repo/comment_2_45c22f596a18d5dc2331cfeef8c767fa._comment new file mode 100644 index 000000000..200210a02 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/todo/A_Way_To_Extract_Previous_Versions_of_a_File_From_a_Direct_Repo/comment_2_45c22f596a18d5dc2331cfeef8c767fa._comment @@ -0,0 +1,12 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="zardoz" + ip="92.227.51.179" + subject="comment 2" + date="2014-05-17T14:18:31Z" + content=""" +It occured to me that one could do something like that by «git show +earlier-commit:file > filename». A problem with this is that a +subsequent «get» will get the old content, but won’t put it in place +until invoking «fsck». + +"""]] -- cgit v1.2.3 From 019de147a3780140572e23106aa4d9f622bc6fcd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: zardoz Date: Sat, 17 May 2014 14:21:30 +0000 Subject: Added a comment --- .../comment_3_4ce1601f5dbd8fb769d3c5bb429c3bc5._comment | 8 ++++++++ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/bugs/Revert_to_old_file_version_in_direct_mode___40__VFAT__41__/comment_3_4ce1601f5dbd8fb769d3c5bb429c3bc5._comment diff --git a/doc/bugs/Revert_to_old_file_version_in_direct_mode___40__VFAT__41__/comment_3_4ce1601f5dbd8fb769d3c5bb429c3bc5._comment b/doc/bugs/Revert_to_old_file_version_in_direct_mode___40__VFAT__41__/comment_3_4ce1601f5dbd8fb769d3c5bb429c3bc5._comment new file mode 100644 index 000000000..6e5db42d0 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/bugs/Revert_to_old_file_version_in_direct_mode___40__VFAT__41__/comment_3_4ce1601f5dbd8fb769d3c5bb429c3bc5._comment @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="zardoz" + ip="92.227.51.179" + subject="comment 3" + date="2014-05-17T14:21:30Z" + content=""" +Plus it seems that the file can’t be dropped normally afterwards. +"""]] -- cgit v1.2.3 From 02a8853c1da7b5c119bee90d57c218e858294d79 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: zardoz Date: Sat, 17 May 2014 14:24:20 +0000 Subject: Added a comment --- .../comment_3_cbca264d86fe733b8106a4bf50c0c6ff._comment | 8 ++++++++ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/todo/A_Way_To_Extract_Previous_Versions_of_a_File_From_a_Direct_Repo/comment_3_cbca264d86fe733b8106a4bf50c0c6ff._comment diff --git a/doc/todo/A_Way_To_Extract_Previous_Versions_of_a_File_From_a_Direct_Repo/comment_3_cbca264d86fe733b8106a4bf50c0c6ff._comment b/doc/todo/A_Way_To_Extract_Previous_Versions_of_a_File_From_a_Direct_Repo/comment_3_cbca264d86fe733b8106a4bf50c0c6ff._comment new file mode 100644 index 000000000..265e0995a --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/todo/A_Way_To_Extract_Previous_Versions_of_a_File_From_a_Direct_Repo/comment_3_cbca264d86fe733b8106a4bf50c0c6ff._comment @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="zardoz" + ip="92.227.51.179" + subject="comment 3" + date="2014-05-17T14:24:20Z" + content=""" +Plus it seems that the file can’t be dropped normally afterwards. +"""]] -- cgit v1.2.3 From 75240688cd4e43a3db2829e922d76c3bd5febfee Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "http://joeyh.name/" Date: Sat, 17 May 2014 17:00:20 +0000 Subject: Added a comment --- .../comment_2_e13b4e5c1e6f1f503f93d521b504d5c1._comment | 16 ++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/forum/Distributing_data_to_a_set_of_drives/comment_2_e13b4e5c1e6f1f503f93d521b504d5c1._comment diff --git a/doc/forum/Distributing_data_to_a_set_of_drives/comment_2_e13b4e5c1e6f1f503f93d521b504d5c1._comment b/doc/forum/Distributing_data_to_a_set_of_drives/comment_2_e13b4e5c1e6f1f503f93d521b504d5c1._comment new file mode 100644 index 000000000..5843ab177 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/forum/Distributing_data_to_a_set_of_drives/comment_2_e13b4e5c1e6f1f503f93d521b504d5c1._comment @@ -0,0 +1,16 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="http://joeyh.name/" + ip="216.145.95.162" + subject="comment 2" + date="2014-05-17T17:00:19Z" + content=""" +git-annex doesn't allow bonding repositories like that, but it does have repository groups which can accomplish the same thing. + +For example, if you put B C and D into the archive group, and set the [[preferred_content]] expression to \"standard\", then each repository will only want files that have not yet reached some other archive repository. + +Or, you can make up your own group name, like \"BCD\" and set the preferred content of each repository to something like \"not (copies=BCD:2)\" -- and now it will try to have 2 copies of each file on one of the drives. + +Once it's configured, using either the git-annex assistant, or `git annex sync --content` will copy files around according to the configuration. + +This will tend to fill up the first drive, or the first 2 drives, and only use subsequent drives if files don't fit on the first drive. You can use [[cost]] settings to control which drives files are put on. +"""]] -- cgit v1.2.3 From 1c95a74d108a689e4e4c4d1b9dc56ffd19612902 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "http://joeyh.name/" Date: Sat, 17 May 2014 17:02:16 +0000 Subject: Added a comment --- .../comment_3_eac16bf98a6e87461ba2f3ab7e990b2b._comment | 10 ++++++++++ 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/forum/Special_remote_public_key_encryption_issue/comment_3_eac16bf98a6e87461ba2f3ab7e990b2b._comment diff --git a/doc/forum/Special_remote_public_key_encryption_issue/comment_3_eac16bf98a6e87461ba2f3ab7e990b2b._comment b/doc/forum/Special_remote_public_key_encryption_issue/comment_3_eac16bf98a6e87461ba2f3ab7e990b2b._comment new file mode 100644 index 000000000..692b307b1 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/forum/Special_remote_public_key_encryption_issue/comment_3_eac16bf98a6e87461ba2f3ab7e990b2b._comment @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="http://joeyh.name/" + ip="216.145.95.162" + subject="comment 3" + date="2014-05-17T17:02:15Z" + content=""" +I dont think it's possible for gpg to prompt for a passphrase when all it has is a public key, so I think you copied the private key too. + +gpg agents can cache your passphrase. +"""]] -- cgit v1.2.3 From 7022549542c77b98d12cf943e4f0e906fdde52ca Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "http://joeyh.name/" Date: Sat, 17 May 2014 17:03:31 +0000 Subject: Added a comment --- .../comment_17_ef7f3e88d61833e51f0302e938343818._comment | 10 ++++++++++ 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/install/Debian/comment_17_ef7f3e88d61833e51f0302e938343818._comment diff --git a/doc/install/Debian/comment_17_ef7f3e88d61833e51f0302e938343818._comment b/doc/install/Debian/comment_17_ef7f3e88d61833e51f0302e938343818._comment new file mode 100644 index 000000000..cd42becc2 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/install/Debian/comment_17_ef7f3e88d61833e51f0302e938343818._comment @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="http://joeyh.name/" + ip="216.145.95.162" + subject="comment 17" + date="2014-05-17T17:03:31Z" + content=""" +Debian squeeze has an extremely ancient ghc compiler, and it would be a mammoth undertaking to build current git-annex using that. + +Use the linux standalone build instead. +"""]] -- cgit v1.2.3 From 5e9e55a29e59b274b1e3076609b29ad27717ab24 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "http://joeyh.name/" Date: Sat, 17 May 2014 17:05:05 +0000 Subject: removed --- .../Debian/comment_9_97eaed998ffd1ed79585075ed5cff06e._comment | 8 -------- 1 file changed, 8 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 doc/install/Debian/comment_9_97eaed998ffd1ed79585075ed5cff06e._comment diff --git a/doc/install/Debian/comment_9_97eaed998ffd1ed79585075ed5cff06e._comment b/doc/install/Debian/comment_9_97eaed998ffd1ed79585075ed5cff06e._comment deleted file mode 100644 index d58f294b6..000000000 --- a/doc/install/Debian/comment_9_97eaed998ffd1ed79585075ed5cff06e._comment +++ /dev/null @@ -1,8 +0,0 @@ -[[!comment format=mdwn - username="http://hands.com/~phil/" - nickname="hands" - subject="any chance of a wheezy-backports upload?" - date="2013-05-30T18:43:52Z" - content=""" -I note that the instructions at the top of the page suggest that one can install the unstable version into wheezy, but as mentioned by [mey.vn](#comment-f9811cbd46471d4159d09d814ac9cf15) this is not the case with 4.20130521 (on amd64 at least) because of the libc6 version dependency. That being the case, it would be really nice to see this in wheezy-backports as well, or would that require backporting a huge pile of haskell as well? (in which case I can see why you're not keen). -"""]] -- cgit v1.2.3 From f48236c64af90440db087fc36be7ad7e17a0ebba Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "http://joeyh.name/" Date: Sat, 17 May 2014 17:05:32 +0000 Subject: removed --- ...comment_5_38e6399083e10a6a274f35bddc15d4ac._comment | 18 ------------------ 1 file changed, 18 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 doc/install/Debian/comment_5_38e6399083e10a6a274f35bddc15d4ac._comment diff --git a/doc/install/Debian/comment_5_38e6399083e10a6a274f35bddc15d4ac._comment b/doc/install/Debian/comment_5_38e6399083e10a6a274f35bddc15d4ac._comment deleted file mode 100644 index fae6c4df8..000000000 --- a/doc/install/Debian/comment_5_38e6399083e10a6a274f35bddc15d4ac._comment +++ /dev/null @@ -1,18 +0,0 @@ -[[!comment format=mdwn - username="https://www.google.com/accounts/o8/id?id=AItOawk3eiQwrpDGJ3MJb9NWB84m4tzQ6XjVZnY" - nickname="Allard" - subject="wheezy support" - date="2012-11-23T20:47:58Z" - content=""" -Hey Joey, - -As a backer, I'd like to see a backport of git annex assistant to wheezy. - -It is currently impossible to get this assistant in wheezy without compiling it with cabal. - -It would be nice to see it in backports or something :) - -Best, - -Allard -"""]] -- cgit v1.2.3 From abbd30d5585b5038cc8776326877109ac42b3b62 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "http://joeyh.name/" Date: Sat, 17 May 2014 17:13:26 +0000 Subject: removed --- .../Debian/comment_6_2e7bbdbaabbfb9d89de22e913066e822._comment | 8 -------- 1 file changed, 8 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 doc/install/Debian/comment_6_2e7bbdbaabbfb9d89de22e913066e822._comment diff --git a/doc/install/Debian/comment_6_2e7bbdbaabbfb9d89de22e913066e822._comment b/doc/install/Debian/comment_6_2e7bbdbaabbfb9d89de22e913066e822._comment deleted file mode 100644 index c4ce6b32a..000000000 --- a/doc/install/Debian/comment_6_2e7bbdbaabbfb9d89de22e913066e822._comment +++ /dev/null @@ -1,8 +0,0 @@ -[[!comment format=mdwn - username="http://svend.ciffer.net/" - ip="2001:4978:f:52e::2" - subject="comment 6" - date="2012-11-23T21:38:29Z" - content=""" -The git-annex packages in unstable install on testing (wheezy). -"""]] -- cgit v1.2.3 From cf89dd9ec0b61998129876af616160ad9a9dde56 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "http://joeyh.name/" Date: Sat, 17 May 2014 17:13:54 +0000 Subject: removed --- .../comment_10_d5da996e106d2e4d8a822aa9bcc78596._comment | 12 ------------ 1 file changed, 12 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 doc/install/Debian/comment_10_d5da996e106d2e4d8a822aa9bcc78596._comment diff --git a/doc/install/Debian/comment_10_d5da996e106d2e4d8a822aa9bcc78596._comment b/doc/install/Debian/comment_10_d5da996e106d2e4d8a822aa9bcc78596._comment deleted file mode 100644 index a03038dc8..000000000 --- a/doc/install/Debian/comment_10_d5da996e106d2e4d8a822aa9bcc78596._comment +++ /dev/null @@ -1,12 +0,0 @@ -[[!comment format=mdwn - username="http://joeyh.name/" - nickname="joey" - subject="comment 10" - date="2013-05-30T19:42:05Z" - content=""" -As of today, I have backported everything except for haskell-lens, haskell-dav, and haskell-network-protocol-xmpp. The last is the only real blocker (I can build a backport without webdav support..). - -The haskell-network-protocol-xmpp in stable is actually ok, except it needs to be rebuilt against the haskell-gnutls I uploaded today. This fixes a bad segfault bug. I don't know how to handle this situation in backports TBH, and so am stuck waiting for a newer version of haskell-network-protocol-xmpp to reach testing, to get around backport's requirements that the backport version be in testing. - -In other words, it'll happen in 2 to 5 weeks, probably.. -"""]] -- cgit v1.2.3 From bdcd5c1a2c4756ae566947310c10fd5aa4fc8dec Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "http://joeyh.name/" Date: Sat, 17 May 2014 17:14:23 +0000 Subject: removed --- .../Debian/comment_11_84283676da247c401bc9b4bb12c2b453._comment | 8 -------- 1 file changed, 8 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 doc/install/Debian/comment_11_84283676da247c401bc9b4bb12c2b453._comment diff --git a/doc/install/Debian/comment_11_84283676da247c401bc9b4bb12c2b453._comment b/doc/install/Debian/comment_11_84283676da247c401bc9b4bb12c2b453._comment deleted file mode 100644 index 4507f36db..000000000 --- a/doc/install/Debian/comment_11_84283676da247c401bc9b4bb12c2b453._comment +++ /dev/null @@ -1,8 +0,0 @@ -[[!comment format=mdwn - username="http://hands.com/~phil/" - nickname="hands" - subject="comment 11" - date="2013-05-30T19:56:07Z" - content=""" -Fair enough -- that's more positive than I was expecting TBH -- Thanks Joey :-) -"""]] -- cgit v1.2.3 From 8dec5abebe78f9ac1c76076421bb73ce11b5d130 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "http://joeyh.name/" Date: Sat, 17 May 2014 17:14:46 +0000 Subject: removed --- .../comment_12_0aca83b055d0a9dd8589c50250a8bbea._comment | 13 ------------- 1 file changed, 13 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 doc/install/Debian/comment_12_0aca83b055d0a9dd8589c50250a8bbea._comment diff --git a/doc/install/Debian/comment_12_0aca83b055d0a9dd8589c50250a8bbea._comment b/doc/install/Debian/comment_12_0aca83b055d0a9dd8589c50250a8bbea._comment deleted file mode 100644 index 419520c80..000000000 --- a/doc/install/Debian/comment_12_0aca83b055d0a9dd8589c50250a8bbea._comment +++ /dev/null @@ -1,13 +0,0 @@ -[[!comment format=mdwn - username="https://www.google.com/accounts/o8/id?id=AItOawmF3Klaj8Q0Czfh1F3jaLF6issqeAhmru4" - nickname="Keith" - subject="Wheezy Support" - date="2013-07-05T21:21:39Z" - content=""" -Joey, - -What's the status on the wheezy backport. I'm itching to try the assistant. - -thanks, -Keith -"""]] -- cgit v1.2.3 From 8132282fc8056e295e6f06bda942c72ff550a248 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "http://joeyh.name/" Date: Sat, 17 May 2014 17:15:09 +0000 Subject: removed --- .../Debian/comment_13_167a091764e5e99ec0f35a65e95a22de._comment | 8 -------- 1 file changed, 8 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 doc/install/Debian/comment_13_167a091764e5e99ec0f35a65e95a22de._comment diff --git a/doc/install/Debian/comment_13_167a091764e5e99ec0f35a65e95a22de._comment b/doc/install/Debian/comment_13_167a091764e5e99ec0f35a65e95a22de._comment deleted file mode 100644 index 9f05fea93..000000000 --- a/doc/install/Debian/comment_13_167a091764e5e99ec0f35a65e95a22de._comment +++ /dev/null @@ -1,8 +0,0 @@ -[[!comment format=mdwn - username="http://joeyh.name/" - ip="4.153.254.222" - subject="comment 13" - date="2013-07-07T17:21:10Z" - content=""" -I remain stuck where I was stuck previously on the backport. In the meantime, use [[Linux_standalone]] :( -"""]] -- cgit v1.2.3 From c59577cde31c8e852c1c86601d7998828349cceb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: hyperio Date: Sat, 17 May 2014 17:25:04 +0000 Subject: Added a comment: Still not working --- .../comment_4_fb46e6f3bf3578cff0d592baa94c7183._comment | 8 ++++++++ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/forum/Special_remote_public_key_encryption_issue/comment_4_fb46e6f3bf3578cff0d592baa94c7183._comment diff --git a/doc/forum/Special_remote_public_key_encryption_issue/comment_4_fb46e6f3bf3578cff0d592baa94c7183._comment b/doc/forum/Special_remote_public_key_encryption_issue/comment_4_fb46e6f3bf3578cff0d592baa94c7183._comment new file mode 100644 index 000000000..6bd457506 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/forum/Special_remote_public_key_encryption_issue/comment_4_fb46e6f3bf3578cff0d592baa94c7183._comment @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="hyperio" + ip="62.31.92.216" + subject="Still not working" + date="2014-05-17T17:25:04Z" + content=""" +I experted the public key on computer 2 with gpg --armor --export [keyid] and just imported it on computer 1... +"""]] -- cgit v1.2.3 From 0fc8cb24d5cf3958d1b927b2f16290683afa2d1a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: hyperio Date: Sat, 17 May 2014 17:25:23 +0000 Subject: Added a comment: Still not working --- .../comment_5_62c65fd298378eea2930de83c98783ea._comment | 8 ++++++++ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/forum/Special_remote_public_key_encryption_issue/comment_5_62c65fd298378eea2930de83c98783ea._comment diff --git a/doc/forum/Special_remote_public_key_encryption_issue/comment_5_62c65fd298378eea2930de83c98783ea._comment b/doc/forum/Special_remote_public_key_encryption_issue/comment_5_62c65fd298378eea2930de83c98783ea._comment new file mode 100644 index 000000000..a9c2bb9b5 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/forum/Special_remote_public_key_encryption_issue/comment_5_62c65fd298378eea2930de83c98783ea._comment @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="hyperio" + ip="62.31.92.216" + subject="Still not working" + date="2014-05-17T17:25:23Z" + content=""" +I exported the public key on computer 2 with gpg --armor --export [keyid] and just imported it on computer 1... +"""]] -- cgit v1.2.3 From b085488842234a3185dbac981fad87a9679d7bae Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: hyperio Date: Sat, 17 May 2014 17:25:39 +0000 Subject: Added a comment: Still not working --- .../comment_6_097f52aaf178340b3abb5bfc80f0d447._comment | 8 ++++++++ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/forum/Special_remote_public_key_encryption_issue/comment_6_097f52aaf178340b3abb5bfc80f0d447._comment diff --git a/doc/forum/Special_remote_public_key_encryption_issue/comment_6_097f52aaf178340b3abb5bfc80f0d447._comment b/doc/forum/Special_remote_public_key_encryption_issue/comment_6_097f52aaf178340b3abb5bfc80f0d447._comment new file mode 100644 index 000000000..93fa8b5b9 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/forum/Special_remote_public_key_encryption_issue/comment_6_097f52aaf178340b3abb5bfc80f0d447._comment @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="hyperio" + ip="62.31.92.216" + subject="Still not working" + date="2014-05-17T17:25:39Z" + content=""" +I exported the public key on computer 2 with gpg --armor --export [keyid] and just imported it on computer 1... +"""]] -- cgit v1.2.3 From b584f9493dca5451d1a79d2a9aca0f3b0345e5f5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: hyperio Date: Sat, 17 May 2014 17:26:05 +0000 Subject: removed --- .../comment_4_fb46e6f3bf3578cff0d592baa94c7183._comment | 8 -------- 1 file changed, 8 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 doc/forum/Special_remote_public_key_encryption_issue/comment_4_fb46e6f3bf3578cff0d592baa94c7183._comment diff --git a/doc/forum/Special_remote_public_key_encryption_issue/comment_4_fb46e6f3bf3578cff0d592baa94c7183._comment b/doc/forum/Special_remote_public_key_encryption_issue/comment_4_fb46e6f3bf3578cff0d592baa94c7183._comment deleted file mode 100644 index 6bd457506..000000000 --- a/doc/forum/Special_remote_public_key_encryption_issue/comment_4_fb46e6f3bf3578cff0d592baa94c7183._comment +++ /dev/null @@ -1,8 +0,0 @@ -[[!comment format=mdwn - username="hyperio" - ip="62.31.92.216" - subject="Still not working" - date="2014-05-17T17:25:04Z" - content=""" -I experted the public key on computer 2 with gpg --armor --export [keyid] and just imported it on computer 1... -"""]] -- cgit v1.2.3 From 6ffddfeb4cc3b9d16903565ed3d3decaeaa650f5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: hyperio Date: Sat, 17 May 2014 17:27:06 +0000 Subject: removed --- .../comment_5_62c65fd298378eea2930de83c98783ea._comment | 8 -------- 1 file changed, 8 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 doc/forum/Special_remote_public_key_encryption_issue/comment_5_62c65fd298378eea2930de83c98783ea._comment diff --git a/doc/forum/Special_remote_public_key_encryption_issue/comment_5_62c65fd298378eea2930de83c98783ea._comment b/doc/forum/Special_remote_public_key_encryption_issue/comment_5_62c65fd298378eea2930de83c98783ea._comment deleted file mode 100644 index a9c2bb9b5..000000000 --- a/doc/forum/Special_remote_public_key_encryption_issue/comment_5_62c65fd298378eea2930de83c98783ea._comment +++ /dev/null @@ -1,8 +0,0 @@ -[[!comment format=mdwn - username="hyperio" - ip="62.31.92.216" - subject="Still not working" - date="2014-05-17T17:25:23Z" - content=""" -I exported the public key on computer 2 with gpg --armor --export [keyid] and just imported it on computer 1... -"""]] -- cgit v1.2.3