From b7aebfc7c1835aad9ae95aff4c3837d6ab6e19c3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Joey Hess Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2017 14:23:16 -0400 Subject: ah, I got it --- .../comment_5_8c33fc01dd1de2abcd3782ff89b437de._comment | 9 +++++++++ 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+) diff --git a/doc/bugs/annex_copy_might_not_report_percent-progress_when_it_has_actual_key_file/comment_5_8c33fc01dd1de2abcd3782ff89b437de._comment b/doc/bugs/annex_copy_might_not_report_percent-progress_when_it_has_actual_key_file/comment_5_8c33fc01dd1de2abcd3782ff89b437de._comment index 170b21764..5645cb675 100644 --- a/doc/bugs/annex_copy_might_not_report_percent-progress_when_it_has_actual_key_file/comment_5_8c33fc01dd1de2abcd3782ff89b437de._comment +++ b/doc/bugs/annex_copy_might_not_report_percent-progress_when_it_has_actual_key_file/comment_5_8c33fc01dd1de2abcd3782ff89b437de._comment @@ -5,4 +5,13 @@ content=""" I don't understand what you mean with the find command. Are you talking about the "unknown" values in the json? + +Oh, I suppose you mean particularly that the bytesize is unknown. + +Well, this would make `find` output differ depending on whether the key is +present or not, in cases where it would otherwise be the same. And it would +change machine-consumable output in a way that for all I know would break +stuff. + +So, changing that seems like a bad idea. """]] -- cgit v1.2.3