From ae6754e45e3b3230d61163bcc56f7d9fdb963289 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "http://joeyh.name/" <joey@web>
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2013 21:24:06 +0000
Subject: Added a comment

---
 .../bup/comment_7_cb1a0d3076e9d06e7a24204478f6fa98._comment    | 10 ++++++++++
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 doc/special_remotes/bup/comment_7_cb1a0d3076e9d06e7a24204478f6fa98._comment

diff --git a/doc/special_remotes/bup/comment_7_cb1a0d3076e9d06e7a24204478f6fa98._comment b/doc/special_remotes/bup/comment_7_cb1a0d3076e9d06e7a24204478f6fa98._comment
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..a2284c3e1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/special_remotes/bup/comment_7_cb1a0d3076e9d06e7a24204478f6fa98._comment
@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
+[[!comment format=mdwn
+ username="http://joeyh.name/"
+ nickname="joey"
+ subject="comment 7"
+ date="2013-04-02T21:24:06Z"
+ content="""
+`bup-split` uses a git branch to name the objects stored in the bup repository. So it will be limited by any scalability issues affecting large numbers of git branches. I don't know what those are.
+
+Yes, it would be possible to make git-annex store this in the git-annex branch instead.
+"""]]
-- 
cgit v1.2.3