From acb2419cba37bdaf68914ad1d69f3e288a4f1988 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Joey Hess Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2016 12:42:48 -0400 Subject: close --- doc/todo/support_path-style_syntax_for_S3_bucket_specification.mdwn | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/doc/todo/support_path-style_syntax_for_S3_bucket_specification.mdwn b/doc/todo/support_path-style_syntax_for_S3_bucket_specification.mdwn index e5e98d112..5376d88b1 100644 --- a/doc/todo/support_path-style_syntax_for_S3_bucket_specification.mdwn +++ b/doc/todo/support_path-style_syntax_for_S3_bucket_specification.mdwn @@ -1,3 +1,5 @@ It appears that currently there's no way to use the "path-style" method for accessing S3 buckets (as contrasted [here](http://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonS3/latest/dev/RESTAPI.html) with the "virtual hosted-style" of bucket specification). Would it be possible to add an S3-special-remote configuration parameter to adjust the underlying S3 library's "s3RequestStyle" config parameter? I believe that the "PathStyle" value would be relevant to this specific request, as mentioned in the [S3 library README](https://github.com/aristidb/aws#frequently-asked-questions). The virtual-hosted style of bucket specification involves a lot of DNS overhead. In my particular use case, I'm looking at running Ceph with a radosgw with S3 support, and in fact the Ceph documention [specifically indicates](http://docs.ceph.com/docs/master/radosgw/s3/commons/#bucket-and-host-name) a preference for "path-style" bucket specification. + +> [[done]] --[[Joey]] -- cgit v1.2.3