From 9543273e8f4518f76e703191ecba684188f6cac0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "http://joeyh.name/" Date: Mon, 6 May 2013 15:08:19 +0000 Subject: Added a comment --- .../comment_2_58bbb105bdbb72bba85c3622195f43b9._comment | 12 ++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/design/assistant/blog/day_254__Android_app_polishing/comment_2_58bbb105bdbb72bba85c3622195f43b9._comment diff --git a/doc/design/assistant/blog/day_254__Android_app_polishing/comment_2_58bbb105bdbb72bba85c3622195f43b9._comment b/doc/design/assistant/blog/day_254__Android_app_polishing/comment_2_58bbb105bdbb72bba85c3622195f43b9._comment new file mode 100644 index 000000000..7311b72e0 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/design/assistant/blog/day_254__Android_app_polishing/comment_2_58bbb105bdbb72bba85c3622195f43b9._comment @@ -0,0 +1,12 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="http://joeyh.name/" + nickname="joey" + subject="comment 2" + date="2013-05-06T15:08:19Z" + content=""" +As it stands, using the \"source\" repository type will tend to remove the picture from that repository pretty quickly, assuming a fast network connection. I think if you want to do things on your phone with pictures you take, it's best to use \"client\" instead. Perhaps with an archive repository set up, so you can move stuff to an \"archive\" folder when done with it to get it removed from the phone. + +Whether \"source\" is a good default in this case remains to be seen... + +It might also be possible to change \"source\" in some way to make it more useful. For example, if it held onto new files for a day after they were created, you'd have plenty of time to use them before they expire off your phone. I have posted some thoughts about this to [[partial_content]]. +"""]] -- cgit v1.2.3 From 5a5a30f694b5771e046aa1932512892e11324830 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "http://joeyh.name/" Date: Mon, 6 May 2013 15:14:06 +0000 Subject: Added a comment --- .../comment_6_01ba0f9bfa0ed066c4b73d2d6028eecc._comment | 8 ++++++++ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/assistant/local_pairing_walkthrough/comment_6_01ba0f9bfa0ed066c4b73d2d6028eecc._comment diff --git a/doc/assistant/local_pairing_walkthrough/comment_6_01ba0f9bfa0ed066c4b73d2d6028eecc._comment b/doc/assistant/local_pairing_walkthrough/comment_6_01ba0f9bfa0ed066c4b73d2d6028eecc._comment new file mode 100644 index 000000000..1b2f66bd9 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/assistant/local_pairing_walkthrough/comment_6_01ba0f9bfa0ed066c4b73d2d6028eecc._comment @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="http://joeyh.name/" + nickname="joey" + subject="comment 6" + date="2013-05-06T15:14:06Z" + content=""" +It's quite possible that your router doesn't handle multicast traffic to 224.0.0.251. The best way to check is to a) see if avahi/zeroconf works, since it's sending similar traffic and b) run tcpdump on both machines and see if the packets being sent on port 55556 by one are seen by the other. +"""]] -- cgit v1.2.3 From ecf299babf7dcca48e43ea6a778fddca68f6434d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "https://www.google.com/accounts/o8/id?id=AItOawn26WQjIP5fnMgQF_L_k3Q3UrR5v8mjRTY" Date: Mon, 6 May 2013 15:32:51 +0000 Subject: Added a comment: addendum to comment 4 --- .../comment_7_74373eb2cc46b76659e3c463d6682d15._comment | 10 ++++++++++ 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/bugs/Android_app_permission_denial_on_startup/comment_7_74373eb2cc46b76659e3c463d6682d15._comment diff --git a/doc/bugs/Android_app_permission_denial_on_startup/comment_7_74373eb2cc46b76659e3c463d6682d15._comment b/doc/bugs/Android_app_permission_denial_on_startup/comment_7_74373eb2cc46b76659e3c463d6682d15._comment new file mode 100644 index 000000000..12c1e3eed --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/bugs/Android_app_permission_denial_on_startup/comment_7_74373eb2cc46b76659e3c463d6682d15._comment @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="https://www.google.com/accounts/o8/id?id=AItOawn26WQjIP5fnMgQF_L_k3Q3UrR5v8mjRTY" + nickname="Ellis" + subject="addendum to comment 4" + date="2013-05-06T15:32:51Z" + content=""" +As a side node, my device is rooted. The web browser starts properly when I start it as follows: adb shell; su; /data/data/ga.androidterm/runshell; git annex webapp + +However, with previous versions of git-annex for android, I had problems with git-annex when starting it this way; if I recall correctly, ``git annex get`` didn't work. Will test again when I have time. +"""]] -- cgit v1.2.3 From f3d0d7665a172665ffe8d6e0d490d5ce21200b05 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "http://joeyh.name/" Date: Mon, 6 May 2013 15:43:06 +0000 Subject: Added a comment --- ...ent_1_d1605a6e3b4d6863f4089218994ce564._comment | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/forum/annexed_file_key_for_web_remote_with_SHA256E_backend/comment_1_d1605a6e3b4d6863f4089218994ce564._comment diff --git a/doc/forum/annexed_file_key_for_web_remote_with_SHA256E_backend/comment_1_d1605a6e3b4d6863f4089218994ce564._comment b/doc/forum/annexed_file_key_for_web_remote_with_SHA256E_backend/comment_1_d1605a6e3b4d6863f4089218994ce564._comment new file mode 100644 index 000000000..8b78618a9 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/forum/annexed_file_key_for_web_remote_with_SHA256E_backend/comment_1_d1605a6e3b4d6863f4089218994ce564._comment @@ -0,0 +1,29 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="http://joeyh.name/" + nickname="joey" + subject="comment 1" + date="2013-05-06T15:43:06Z" + content=""" +You don't say what version of git-annex you're using. I tested with the current version, 4.20130405: + +[[!format sh \"\"\" +joey@gnu:~/tmp/rr>git annex addurl http://localhost/~joey/header_background.png +addurl localhost_~joey_header_background.png (downloading http://localhost/~joey/header_background.png ...) --2013-05-06 11:36:41-- http://localhost/~joey/header_background.png +Resolving localhost (localhost)... ::1, 127.0.0.1, 127.0.1.1 +Connecting to localhost (localhost)|::1|:80... connected. +HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK +Length: 53693 (52K) [image/png] +Saving to: ‘/home/joey/tmp/rr/.git/annex/tmp/URL--http&c%%localhost%~joey%header_background.png’ + +100%[======================================>] 53,693 --.-K/s in 0.001s + +2013-05-06 11:36:41 (58.9 MB/s) - '/home/joey/tmp/rr/.git/annex/tmp/URL--http&c%%localhost%~joey%header_background.png' saved [53693/53693] + +(checksum...) ok +(Recording state in git...) +joey@gnu:~/tmp/rr>dir +lrwxrwxrwx 1 joey joey 194 Sep 11 2010 localhost_~joey_header_background.png -> .git/annex/objects/M1/p0/SHA256E-s53693--3f065e8e2db1248765d0753cf483e40ae0eaf9bffe34b0cf738158815d0884e3.png/SHA256E-s53693--3f065e8e2db1248765d0753cf483e40ae0eaf9bffe34b0cf738158815d0884e3.png +\"\"\"]] + +Looks like it's doing the right thing with the extension! +"""]] -- cgit v1.2.3 From 1c28e25e07b617f1a6b8f870d3c8864eea252d5a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "http://joeyh.name/" Date: Mon, 6 May 2013 15:59:00 +0000 Subject: Added a comment --- .../comment_2_09450d58df2373174a1f0d90b08e9eb3._comment | 14 ++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/bugs/Huge_annex_out_of_memory_on_switch_to_indirect_mode_and_status/comment_2_09450d58df2373174a1f0d90b08e9eb3._comment diff --git a/doc/bugs/Huge_annex_out_of_memory_on_switch_to_indirect_mode_and_status/comment_2_09450d58df2373174a1f0d90b08e9eb3._comment b/doc/bugs/Huge_annex_out_of_memory_on_switch_to_indirect_mode_and_status/comment_2_09450d58df2373174a1f0d90b08e9eb3._comment new file mode 100644 index 000000000..b0e5bb5c2 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/bugs/Huge_annex_out_of_memory_on_switch_to_indirect_mode_and_status/comment_2_09450d58df2373174a1f0d90b08e9eb3._comment @@ -0,0 +1,14 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="http://joeyh.name/" + nickname="joey" + subject="comment 2" + date="2013-05-06T15:59:00Z" + content=""" +Looks like you have around 61396 files, which is not really very many. Is that guess accurate? + +I have repositories with that many files, that do not run out of memory, or even use much memory at all when running `git annex status`. Just tried and it needed 15 mb, not 900. + +Since you're using Ubuntu precise with a current version of git-annex, I'll bet you installed from fmarier's PPA. Is that right? + +In case this is a problem only with the build in the PPA, can you please download the [[/install/Linux_standalone]] tarball, and try the same command using the git-annex from there? +"""]] -- cgit v1.2.3 From 99629dbee711996ac6db74971c1f23d664eef1a4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "http://joeyh.name/" Date: Mon, 6 May 2013 16:41:43 +0000 Subject: Added a comment --- .../comment_4_b0bfd68998bc3e11d8e089646b8292a6._comment | 12 ++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/bugs/Unable_to_switch_back_to_direct_mode/comment_4_b0bfd68998bc3e11d8e089646b8292a6._comment diff --git a/doc/bugs/Unable_to_switch_back_to_direct_mode/comment_4_b0bfd68998bc3e11d8e089646b8292a6._comment b/doc/bugs/Unable_to_switch_back_to_direct_mode/comment_4_b0bfd68998bc3e11d8e089646b8292a6._comment new file mode 100644 index 000000000..af406b1d2 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/bugs/Unable_to_switch_back_to_direct_mode/comment_4_b0bfd68998bc3e11d8e089646b8292a6._comment @@ -0,0 +1,12 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="http://joeyh.name/" + nickname="joey" + subject="comment 4" + date="2013-05-06T16:41:42Z" + content=""" +cwebber sent me a test case, and it turns out that while his problem was different, I fixed it in the same commit I fixed the problem described in the comment above. Both problems involved cases where the object storage directory was left with frozen permissions, and they needed to be unlocked before moving files in/out of it. + +Also, it seems that blender did not misbehave as thought. It only replaces the git-annex symlink with a new .blend file. Which is fine. + +Finally, there was an unrelated bug in `git annex direct` that chris's test case repo happened to have, which caused it to not convert 2 files to direct mode. I've fixed that bug as well. +"""]] -- cgit v1.2.3