From 782956d7fbfd420d08c212538df887f5b22eb4a6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Joey Hess Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2016 16:07:38 -0400 Subject: response --- .../comment_2_25d4ed016e98609066597a8d2b956f87._comment | 15 +++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/git-annex-importfeed/comment_2_25d4ed016e98609066597a8d2b956f87._comment diff --git a/doc/git-annex-importfeed/comment_2_25d4ed016e98609066597a8d2b956f87._comment b/doc/git-annex-importfeed/comment_2_25d4ed016e98609066597a8d2b956f87._comment new file mode 100644 index 000000000..206dab711 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/git-annex-importfeed/comment_2_25d4ed016e98609066597a8d2b956f87._comment @@ -0,0 +1,15 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="joey" + subject="""comment 2""" + date="2016-01-01T20:04:02Z" + content=""" +All spaces and punctuation (other than '.') and other wacky stuff are replaced with +'_' when git-annex builds a filename from some untrusted source like a +feed. + +I think it makes sense to do that even for '-', at least if it's at the +start of a filename. "--force" is not a filename you want to let a feed +inject into your work tree. I could perhaps be convinced to let '-' +elsewhere in the filename through unmunged, but simplicity and consistency +suggests it's just as good to always munge it. +"""]] -- cgit v1.2.3