From 6fa117bf16fc542e6c1b1d846f1a4a00e7dad7e7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Joey Hess Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2013 20:48:41 -0400 Subject: respond --- doc/todo/Sync_repo_names__63__.mdwn | 7 +++++++ 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) diff --git a/doc/todo/Sync_repo_names__63__.mdwn b/doc/todo/Sync_repo_names__63__.mdwn index c4d81b0d8..d3bb59f04 100644 --- a/doc/todo/Sync_repo_names__63__.mdwn +++ b/doc/todo/Sync_repo_names__63__.mdwn @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ It's very confusing to me that the same repo viewed from different client systems can have different names and descriptions. This implies that making changes to a remote repo from one system only affects how that system sees the repo, but it seems to affect how the entire git-annex "pair" or "network of repos" sees it. I think it would be good if the names and descriptions of repos were synced across clients. + +> The descriptions of repositories are synced. (They're stored in git-annex:uuid.log) +> +> git allows for the same repository to be referred to using as many different remote names as you want to set up. git-annex inherits this, +> and I can't see this changing; there are very good reasons for remotes to +> have this flexability. [[done]] +> --[[Joey]] -- cgit v1.2.3