From 5b91ff02eaafe268b44ae0d37a793b7969ccbc28 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Joey Hess Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2015 16:32:13 -0400 Subject: response --- .../comment_1_dd4ebb10ac87e3ee6158b7e7b1273a81._comment | 12 ++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/forum/Slow_transfer_speeds_on_copy_in_Windows/comment_1_dd4ebb10ac87e3ee6158b7e7b1273a81._comment diff --git a/doc/forum/Slow_transfer_speeds_on_copy_in_Windows/comment_1_dd4ebb10ac87e3ee6158b7e7b1273a81._comment b/doc/forum/Slow_transfer_speeds_on_copy_in_Windows/comment_1_dd4ebb10ac87e3ee6158b7e7b1273a81._comment new file mode 100644 index 000000000..e6bdd2c4e --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/forum/Slow_transfer_speeds_on_copy_in_Windows/comment_1_dd4ebb10ac87e3ee6158b7e7b1273a81._comment @@ -0,0 +1,12 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="joey" + subject="""comment 1""" + date="2015-04-09T20:30:19Z" + content=""" +There's not a lot of places where git-annex could make this slower. +git-annex copy is just running rsync to the ssh server. + +Have you tried benchmarking rsync of a large file to the server w/o +git-annex? rsync does do considerably more client-side work than does +scp, in order to support resuming, so that might be it. +"""]] -- cgit v1.2.3