From 1de00df63602bc67a19a72ec2a07821edea6619d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "https://www.google.com/accounts/o8/id?id=AItOawnBJ6Dv1glxzzi4qIzGFNa6F-mfHIvv9Ck" Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2011 21:12:30 +0000 Subject: --- doc/bugs/old_data_isn__39__t_unused_after_migration.mdwn | 6 ++++++ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) diff --git a/doc/bugs/old_data_isn__39__t_unused_after_migration.mdwn b/doc/bugs/old_data_isn__39__t_unused_after_migration.mdwn index 9d1bbc4e0..46febe72e 100644 --- a/doc/bugs/old_data_isn__39__t_unused_after_migration.mdwn +++ b/doc/bugs/old_data_isn__39__t_unused_after_migration.mdwn @@ -53,3 +53,9 @@ The two files are hardlinked, so it's not taking up extra space, but it would be > still finds a file referring to the old key. > > So, slightly surprising, but not a bug. --[[Joey]] [[done]] + +>> Thanks for the explanation. In my real repository, it was a bit trickier: +>> the migration was commited to `master`, but other *remote* branches still +>> referenced those keys. I was just doing a `git pull` from a central repo, but +>> needed a `git remote update` to remove those references from `remotes/foo/master` too. +>> --Jim -- cgit v1.2.3