From 0e1a2c7c470d7b09855e77956780d03cafd4fc66 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "http://joeyh.name/" Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2014 17:22:12 +0000 Subject: Added a comment --- .../comment_11_632456a0a1d399ee2bbac76b7d63a5f1._comment | 14 ++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/bugs/FAT:_Date_resolution_for_mtime_2s--__62___implications/comment_11_632456a0a1d399ee2bbac76b7d63a5f1._comment diff --git a/doc/bugs/FAT:_Date_resolution_for_mtime_2s--__62___implications/comment_11_632456a0a1d399ee2bbac76b7d63a5f1._comment b/doc/bugs/FAT:_Date_resolution_for_mtime_2s--__62___implications/comment_11_632456a0a1d399ee2bbac76b7d63a5f1._comment new file mode 100644 index 000000000..2605d69ab --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/bugs/FAT:_Date_resolution_for_mtime_2s--__62___implications/comment_11_632456a0a1d399ee2bbac76b7d63a5f1._comment @@ -0,0 +1,14 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="http://joeyh.name/" + ip="108.236.230.124" + subject="comment 11" + date="2014-06-11T17:22:12Z" + content=""" +@martin, to the best of my knowledge and testing, what you're proposing `git annex add` do in this case is identical to what it already happens to do, except for the message displayed. + +Do you have an example of it not doing that? + +We seem to be talking past one-another, since I've now said three times this is what it does. And I've tested it twice. + +I don't think that the current behavior of add, or your suggested behavior (which again, happens to be nearly identical) is sufficient to close this bug report with. +"""]] -- cgit v1.2.3