From 09a8c6995360b1ef7f8cb5f7d0f9628df681da6f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Joey Hess Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2016 12:51:20 -0400 Subject: reproduced --- .../comment_5_7b0048871f939b566b5c65d0bf7ab968._comment | 9 +++++++++ 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/bugs/duplicate_progress_reports_in_parallel___39__get__39__/comment_5_7b0048871f939b566b5c65d0bf7ab968._comment diff --git a/doc/bugs/duplicate_progress_reports_in_parallel___39__get__39__/comment_5_7b0048871f939b566b5c65d0bf7ab968._comment b/doc/bugs/duplicate_progress_reports_in_parallel___39__get__39__/comment_5_7b0048871f939b566b5c65d0bf7ab968._comment new file mode 100644 index 000000000..dfe2e9b07 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/bugs/duplicate_progress_reports_in_parallel___39__get__39__/comment_5_7b0048871f939b566b5c65d0bf7ab968._comment @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="joey" + subject="""comment 5""" + date="2016-04-19T16:50:02Z" + content=""" +Reproduced it. The crucial thing is that this is a download from a git +remote over http. Seems that in that case, the same progress info ends up +getting fed into two separate progress meters. +"""]] -- cgit v1.2.3