Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | |
---|---|---|---|
* | Compatibility after Coq PR#262. | 2018-05-14 | |
| | | | | | | | | | Coq PR#262 makes the inference of return clauses more uniform and general but unification is sometimes not strong enough to deal with this generality. See #5107 for details. One reduces the search space for a return clause by forbidding it to be obtained by small inversion. | ||
* | move Loops from Experiments to Util | 2018-03-27 | |
| | |||
* | Montgomery.XZ, Loops: montladder proof scaffolding | 2017-12-22 | |
| | |||
* | Curves.Montgomery.XZ: add+check boringssl ladderstep (#278) | 2017-12-05 | |
| | |||
* | use ladderstep from donna (2% faster?) | 2017-05-15 | |
| | |||
* | Respond to code review comments | 2017-04-17 | |
| | |||
* | Use the for-loop notation in Montgomery.XZ | 2017-04-17 | |
| | | | | | We also need to stuff the local notations in a scope so that we can still access the notations in core_scope | ||
* | rename-everything | 2017-04-06 | |